Literature DB >> 25786828

Unique aspects of the structure and dynamics of elementary Iβ cellulose microfibrils revealed by computational simulations.

Daniel P Oehme1, Matthew T Downton1, Monika S Doblin1, John Wagner1, Michael J Gidley2, Antony Bacic2.   

Abstract

The question of how many chains an elementary cellulose microfibril contains is critical to understanding the molecular mechanism(s) of cellulose biosynthesis and regulation. Given the hexagonal nature of the cellulose synthase rosette, it is assumed that the number of chains must be a multiple of six. We present molecular dynamics simulations on three different models of Iβ cellulose microfibrils, 18, 24, and 36 chains, to investigate their structure and dynamics in a hydrated environment. The 36-chain model stays in a conformational space that is very similar to the initial crystalline phase, while the 18- and 24-chain models sample a conformational space different from the crystalline structure yet similar to conformations observed in recent high-temperature molecular dynamics simulations. Major differences in the conformations sampled between the different models result from changes to the tilt of chains in different layers, specifically a second stage of tilt, increased rotation about the O2-C2 dihedral, and a greater sampling of non-TG exocyclic conformations, particularly the GG conformation in center layers and GT conformation in solvent-exposed exocyclic groups. With a reinterpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance data, specifically for contributions made to the C6 peak, data from the simulations suggest that the 18- and 24-chain structures are more viable models for an elementary cellulose microfibril, which also correlates with recent scattering and diffraction experimental data. These data inform biochemical and molecular studies that must explain how a six-particle cellulose synthase complex rosette synthesizes microfibrils likely comprised of either 18 or 24 chains.
© 2015 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25786828      PMCID: PMC4424011          DOI: 10.1104/pp.114.254664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  30 in total

1.  Plant biology. Prime time for cellulose.

Authors:  Steve M Read; Tony Bacic
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Conformational features of crystal-surface cellulose from higher plants.

Authors:  Remco J Viëtor; Roger H Newman; Marie-Ann Ha; David C Apperley; Michael C Jarvis
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules.

Authors:  Janne Lehtiö; Junji Sugiyama; Malin Gustavsson; Linda Fransson; Markus Linder; Tuula T Teeri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Fine structure in cellulose microfibrils: NMR evidence from onion and quince.

Authors:  M A Ha; D C Apperley; B W Evans; I M Huxham; W G Jardine; R J Viëtor; D Reis; B Vian; M C Jarvis
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  Thermal response in crystalline Ibeta cellulose: a molecular dynamics study.

Authors:  Malin Bergenstråhle; Lars A Berglund; Karim Mazeau
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Estimation of the lateral dimensions of cellulose crystallites using 13C NMR signal strengths.

Authors:  R H Newman
Journal:  Solid State Nucl Magn Reson       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Wide-angle x-ray scattering and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance data combined to test models for cellulose microfibrils in mung bean cell walls.

Authors:  Roger H Newman; Stefan J Hill; Philip J Harris
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Additive empirical force field for hexopyranose monosaccharides.

Authors:  Olgun Guvench; Shannon N Greene; Ganesh Kamath; John W Brady; Richard M Venable; Richard W Pastor; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Carbohydrate solution simulations: producing a force field with experimentally consistent primary alcohol rotational frequencies and populations.

Authors:  Michelle Kuttel; J W Brady; Kevin J Naidoo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  The pattern of xylan acetylation suggests xylan may interact with cellulose microfibrils as a twofold helical screw in the secondary plant cell wall of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Marta Busse-Wicher; Thiago C F Gomes; Theodora Tryfona; Nino Nikolovski; Katherine Stott; Nicholas J Grantham; David N Bolam; Munir S Skaf; Paul Dupree
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 6.417

View more
  11 in total

1.  Cellulose-Pectin Spatial Contacts Are Inherent to Never-Dried Arabidopsis Primary Cell Walls: Evidence from Solid-State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  Tuo Wang; Yong Bum Park; Daniel J Cosgrove; Mei Hong
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  The cell biology of secondary cell wall biosynthesis.

Authors:  Miranda J Meents; Yoichiro Watanabe; A Lacey Samuels
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Biopolymer nanofibrils: structure, modeling, preparation, and applications.

Authors:  Shengjie Ling; Wenshuai Chen; Yimin Fan; Ke Zheng; Kai Jin; Haipeng Yu; Markus J Buehler; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 29.190

4.  Cellulose Structural Polymorphism in Plant Primary Cell Walls Investigated by High-Field 2D Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy and Density Functional Theory Calculations.

Authors:  Tuo Wang; Hui Yang; James D Kubicki; Mei Hong
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 6.988

5.  Functional Specialization of Cellulose Synthase Isoforms in a Moss Shows Parallels with Seed Plants.

Authors:  Joanna H Norris; Xingxing Li; Shixin Huang; Allison M L Van de Meene; Mai L Tran; Erin Killeavy; Arielle M Chaves; Bailey Mallon; Danielle Mercure; Hwei-Ting Tan; Rachel A Burton; Monika S Doblin; Seong H Kim; Alison W Roberts
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  A Structural Study of CESA1 Catalytic Domain of Arabidopsis Cellulose Synthesis Complex: Evidence for CESA Trimers.

Authors:  Venu Gopal Vandavasi; Daniel K Putnam; Qiu Zhang; Loukas Petridis; William T Heller; B Tracy Nixon; Candace H Haigler; Udaya Kalluri; Leighton Coates; Paul Langan; Jeremy C Smith; Jens Meiler; Hugh O'Neill
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Evolution of Xylan Substitution Patterns in Gymnosperms and Angiosperms: Implications for Xylan Interaction with Cellulose.

Authors:  Marta Busse-Wicher; An Li; Rodrigo L Silveira; Caroline S Pereira; Theodora Tryfona; Thiago C F Gomes; Munir S Skaf; Paul Dupree
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 8.  Plant Fibre: Molecular Structure and Biomechanical Properties, of a Complex Living Material, Influencing Its Deconstruction towards a Biobased Composite.

Authors:  Mathias Sorieul; Alan Dickson; Stefan J Hill; Hamish Pearson
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Cellulose synthase complexes display distinct dynamic behaviors during xylem transdifferentiation.

Authors:  Yoichiro Watanabe; Rene Schneider; Sarah Barkwill; Eliana Gonzales-Vigil; Joseph L Hill; A Lacey Samuels; Staffan Persson; Shawn D Mansfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Comparative Structural and Computational Analysis Supports Eighteen Cellulose Synthases in the Plant Cellulose Synthesis Complex.

Authors:  B Tracy Nixon; Katayoun Mansouri; Abhishek Singh; Juan Du; Jonathan K Davis; Jung-Goo Lee; Erin Slabaugh; Venu Gopal Vandavasi; Hugh O'Neill; Eric M Roberts; Alison W Roberts; Yaroslava G Yingling; Candace H Haigler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.