Literature DB >> 26594562

Crystal structure of 2-cyano-1-methyl-pyridinium bromide.

Vu D Nguyen1, Cameron A McCormick1, Robert A Pascal2, Joel T Mague2, Lynn V Koplitz1.   

Abstract

In the title mol-ecular salt, C7H7N2 (+)·Br(-), all the non-H atoms lie on crystallographic mirror planes. The packing consists of (010) cation-anion layers, with the cations forming dimeric units via very weak pairwise C-H⋯N inter-actions. Weak C-H⋯Br inter-actions link the cations to the anions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-cyano-1-methyl­pyridinium bromide; crystal structure; salt

Year:  2015        PMID: 26594562      PMCID: PMC4645077          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Related literature

For structures of other salts of the 2-cyano-1-methyl­pyridinium cation, see: Koplitz et al. (2012 ▸); Kammer et al. (2013 ▸); Vaccaro et al. (2015 ▸). For structures of salts of the isomeric 2-cyano­anilinium cation, see: Oueslati et al. (2005 ▸); Cui & Wen (2008 ▸); Zhang, L. (2009 ▸); Zhang, Y. (2009 ▸); Cui & Chen (2010 ▸); Vumbaco et al. (2013 ▸).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H7N2 +·Br M = 199.06 Monoclinic, a = 13.3039 (12) Å b = 6.5892 (6) Å c = 9.3753 (8) Å β = 92.419 (1)° V = 821.13 (13) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 4.93 mm−1 T = 150 K 0.20 × 0.15 × 0.06 mm

Data collection

Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2009 ▸) T min = 0.44, T max = 0.74 22367 measured reflections 1179 independent reflections 1084 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.021

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.023 wR(F 2) = 0.048 S = 1.02 1179 reflections 62 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.51 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.44 e Å−3

Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2014 ▸); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2014 ▸); data reduction: SAINT and CELL_NOW (Sheldrick, 2008a ▸); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXT (Sheldrick, 2015a ▸); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015b ▸); molecular graphics: DIAMOND (Brandenburg & Putz, 2012 ▸); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008b ▸). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019167/hb7523sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019167/hb7523Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019167/hb7523Isup3.cml Click here for additional data file. . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019167/hb7523fig1.tif The title compound with labeling scheme and 50% probability ellipsoids. Click here for additional data file. c . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019167/hb7523fig2.tif Packing viewed down the c axis showing the layer structure. Click here for additional data file. b . DOI: 10.1107/S2056989015019167/hb7523fig3.tif Packing viewed down the b axis showing the weak C—H⋯N (blue dotted lines) and C—H⋯Br (orange dotted lines) inter­actions. CCDC reference: 1430625 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H7N2+·BrF(000) = 392
Mr = 199.06Dx = 1.610 Mg m3
Monoclinic, C2/mMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 13.3039 (12) ÅCell parameters from 9936 reflections
b = 6.5892 (6) Åθ = 2.2–29.1°
c = 9.3753 (8) ŵ = 4.93 mm1
β = 92.419 (1)°T = 150 K
V = 821.13 (13) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.20 × 0.15 × 0.06 mm
Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer1179 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1084 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.021
Detector resolution: 8.3660 pixels mm-1θmax = 29.1°, θmin = 2.2°
φ and ω scansh = −18→18
Absorption correction: multi-scan (TWINABS; Sheldrick, 2009)k = −8→8
Tmin = 0.44, Tmax = 0.74l = −12→12
22367 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.023Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.048H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.02w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0234P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1179 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
62 parametersΔρmax = 0.51 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.44 e Å3
Experimental. The diffraction data were obtained from 3 sets of 400 frames, each of width 0.5° in ω, colllected at φ = 0.00, 90.00 and 180.00° and 2 sets of 800 frames, each of width 0.45° in φ, collected at ω = -30.00 and 210.00°. The scan time was 20 sec/frame. Analysis of 1897 reflections having I/σ(I) > 13 and chosen from the full data set with CELL_NOW (Sheldrick, 2008a) showed the crystal to belong to the monoclinic system and to be twinned by a 180 ° rotation about a*. The raw data were processed using the multi-component version of SAINT under control of the two-component orientation file generated by CELL_NOW.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger. H-atoms attached to carbon were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.95 - 0.98 Å). All were included as riding contributions with isotropic displacement parameters 1.2 - 1.5 times those of the attached atoms. Trial refinements with the single-component reflection file extracted from the full dataset with TWINABS and with the full, 2-component reflection file indicated the former refinement to be superior.
xyzUiso*/UeqOcc. (<1)
N10.29873 (14)0.00000.32868 (18)0.0177 (4)
N20.53530 (17)0.00000.1900 (3)0.0399 (6)
C10.36322 (18)0.00000.4616 (2)0.0239 (5)
H1A0.32120.01770.54400.036*0.5
H1B0.41180.11160.45840.036*0.5
H1C0.3993−0.12930.47010.036*0.5
C20.19853 (17)0.00000.3369 (2)0.0218 (5)
H20.16980.00000.42800.026*
C30.13619 (18)0.00000.2157 (2)0.0269 (5)
H30.06520.00000.22290.032*
C40.17863 (19)0.00000.0830 (3)0.0273 (5)
H40.13680.0000−0.00170.033*
C50.28191 (18)0.00000.0749 (2)0.0237 (5)
H50.31200.0000−0.01520.028*
C60.34090 (17)0.00000.1994 (2)0.0198 (4)
C70.44985 (19)0.00000.1969 (3)0.0280 (5)
Br10.36532 (2)0.50000.29528 (2)0.02252 (9)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
N10.0207 (9)0.0176 (8)0.0152 (9)0.0000.0033 (7)0.000
N20.0292 (12)0.0484 (15)0.0431 (14)0.0000.0139 (10)0.000
C10.0261 (12)0.0271 (12)0.0182 (11)0.000−0.0025 (9)0.000
C20.0220 (11)0.0245 (11)0.0196 (11)0.0000.0076 (8)0.000
C30.0219 (11)0.0337 (13)0.0251 (12)0.0000.0018 (9)0.000
C40.0300 (13)0.0314 (13)0.0203 (11)0.000−0.0022 (9)0.000
C50.0315 (13)0.0232 (11)0.0170 (10)0.0000.0085 (9)0.000
C60.0207 (11)0.0178 (10)0.0216 (11)0.0000.0080 (8)0.000
C70.0274 (13)0.0294 (13)0.0280 (13)0.0000.0104 (10)0.000
Br10.02982 (14)0.02142 (12)0.01687 (12)0.0000.00747 (8)0.000
N1—C21.339 (3)C2—H20.9500
N1—C61.357 (3)C3—C41.388 (3)
N1—C11.482 (3)C3—H30.9500
N2—C71.141 (3)C4—C51.379 (3)
C1—H1A0.9800C4—H40.9500
C1—H1B0.9800C5—C61.379 (3)
C1—H1C0.9800C5—H50.9500
C2—C31.378 (3)C6—C71.451 (3)
C2—N1—C6120.12 (19)C2—C3—H3120.5
C2—N1—C1119.61 (18)C4—C3—H3120.5
C6—N1—C1120.28 (18)C5—C4—C3119.5 (2)
N1—C1—H1A109.5C5—C4—H4120.2
N1—C1—H1B109.5C3—C4—H4120.2
H1A—C1—H1B109.5C6—C5—C4119.1 (2)
N1—C1—H1C109.5C6—C5—H5120.4
H1A—C1—H1C109.5C4—C5—H5120.4
H1B—C1—H1C109.5N1—C6—C5120.9 (2)
N1—C2—C3121.25 (19)N1—C6—C7117.8 (2)
N1—C2—H2119.4C5—C6—C7121.3 (2)
C3—C2—H2119.4N2—C7—C6177.7 (3)
C2—C3—C4119.1 (2)
C6—N1—C2—C30.000 (1)C1—N1—C6—C5180.000 (1)
C1—N1—C2—C3180.000 (1)C2—N1—C6—C7180.000 (1)
N1—C2—C3—C40.000 (1)C1—N1—C6—C70.000 (1)
C2—C3—C4—C50.000 (1)C4—C5—C6—N10.000 (1)
C3—C4—C5—C60.000 (1)C4—C5—C6—C7180.0
C2—N1—C6—C50.000 (1)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C5—H5···N2i0.952.663.549 (3)155
C1—H1A···Br1ii0.982.963.876 (2)156
C2—H2···Br1ii0.952.663.586 (2)166
C3—H3···Br1iii0.952.773.711 (2)170
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (, )

DHA DHHA D A DHA
C5H5N2i 0.952.663.549(3)155
C1H1ABr1ii 0.982.963.876(2)156
C2H2Br1ii 0.952.663.586(2)166
C3H3Br1iii 0.952.773.711(2)170

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  9 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  2-Cyano-anilinium nitrate.

Authors:  Li-Jing Cui; Xiao-Chun Wen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-07-31

3.  2-Cyano-anilinium perchlorate.

Authors:  Li-Jing Cui; Xin-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2010-01-30

4.  2-Cyano-anilinium bromide.

Authors:  Li Zhang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-09-09

5.  2-Cyano-anilinium tetra-fluoro-borate.

Authors:  Yi Zhang
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2009-09-09

6.  SHELXT - integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A Found Adv       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 2.290

7.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

8.  2-Cyano-anilinium iodide.

Authors:  David J Vumbaco; Michael N Kammer; Lynn V Koplitz; Joel T Mague
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-07-20

9.  2-Cyano-1-methyl-pyridinium iodide.

Authors:  Michael N Kammer; Lynn V Koplitz; Joel T Mague
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-07-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.