Literature DB >> 21577838

2-Cyano-anilinium tetra-fluoro-borate.

Yi Zhang1.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(7)H(7)N(2) (+)·BF(4) (-), the non-H atoms of the cation are almost coplanar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.035 Å). The cations and anions are connected by inter-molecular N-H⋯F and N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds, forming a two-dimensional network parallel to (10).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577838      PMCID: PMC2970182          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809032863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For the application of metal-organic coordination compounds, see: Fu et al. (2007 ▶); Chen et al. (2000 ▶); Fu & Xiong (2008 ▶); Xiong et al. (1999 ▶); Xie et al. (2003 ▶); Zhang et al. (2001 ▶). For general background to nitrile derivatives, see: Fu et al. (2008 ▶); Wang et al. (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H7N2 +·BF4 M = 205.96 Monoclinic, a = 10.971 (2) Å b = 7.3565 (15) Å c = 11.022 (2) Å β = 103.11 (3)° V = 866.4 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.16 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.96, T max = 1.00 (expected range = 0.931–0.969) 8625 measured reflections 1978 independent reflections 1417 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.041

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.056 wR(F 2) = 0.141 S = 1.08 1978 reflections 128 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.32 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.32 e Å−3 Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809032863/ci2881sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809032863/ci2881Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H7N2+·BF4F(000) = 416
Mr = 205.96Dx = 1.579 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/nMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ynCell parameters from 1417 reflections
a = 10.971 (2) Åθ = 3.4–27.5°
b = 7.3565 (15) ŵ = 0.16 mm1
c = 11.022 (2) ÅT = 298 K
β = 103.11 (3)°Block, colourless
V = 866.4 (3) Å30.30 × 0.25 × 0.20 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer1978 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1417 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.041
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.4°
CCD profile fitting scansh = −14→14
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.96, Tmax = 1.00l = −14→14
8625 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.056Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.141H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.08w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0571P)2 + 0.4139P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1978 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
128 parametersΔρmax = 0.32 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.32 e Å3
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
F40.36113 (13)0.72246 (19)0.25229 (13)0.0500 (4)
F30.48625 (14)0.7353 (2)0.44366 (13)0.0575 (4)
N10.59296 (16)0.6600 (3)0.69414 (15)0.0337 (4)
H1A0.61820.54820.68120.051*
H1B0.65890.72750.72930.051*
H1C0.55480.70940.62180.051*
F20.34337 (15)0.9602 (2)0.37300 (16)0.0625 (5)
C10.50557 (18)0.6518 (3)0.77689 (18)0.0302 (5)
F10.51445 (14)0.9330 (3)0.29556 (18)0.0737 (6)
C20.5337 (2)0.7425 (3)0.89064 (19)0.0348 (5)
C60.3969 (2)0.5547 (3)0.7402 (2)0.0437 (6)
H60.37920.49390.66430.052*
N20.7317 (2)0.9429 (3)0.9488 (2)0.0586 (6)
C70.6444 (2)0.8517 (3)0.9248 (2)0.0428 (6)
B10.4282 (2)0.8402 (3)0.3425 (2)0.0359 (6)
C40.3405 (3)0.6365 (4)0.9311 (3)0.0580 (8)
H40.28400.63130.98240.070*
C30.4507 (2)0.7323 (3)0.9687 (2)0.0483 (6)
H30.46930.78971.04580.058*
C50.3138 (2)0.5485 (4)0.8180 (3)0.0570 (7)
H50.23930.48420.79340.068*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
F40.0566 (9)0.0453 (8)0.0442 (8)−0.0023 (6)0.0037 (7)−0.0056 (6)
F30.0587 (9)0.0613 (10)0.0455 (8)0.0069 (7)−0.0029 (7)0.0162 (7)
N10.0376 (10)0.0351 (9)0.0291 (9)0.0028 (8)0.0092 (7)−0.0004 (7)
F20.0658 (9)0.0467 (9)0.0762 (11)0.0167 (7)0.0186 (8)−0.0097 (8)
C10.0324 (10)0.0288 (10)0.0303 (10)0.0072 (8)0.0091 (8)0.0036 (8)
F10.0435 (8)0.0830 (12)0.0922 (13)−0.0162 (8)0.0107 (8)0.0342 (10)
C20.0420 (11)0.0316 (11)0.0311 (11)0.0065 (9)0.0091 (9)0.0001 (9)
C60.0356 (12)0.0447 (14)0.0491 (14)0.0034 (10)0.0058 (10)−0.0046 (11)
N20.0597 (14)0.0587 (14)0.0558 (14)−0.0010 (12)0.0095 (11)−0.0178 (11)
C70.0542 (15)0.0392 (13)0.0347 (12)0.0088 (12)0.0094 (11)−0.0075 (10)
B10.0324 (12)0.0315 (12)0.0412 (13)0.0004 (10)0.0030 (10)0.0053 (11)
C40.0609 (17)0.0541 (17)0.0729 (19)0.0135 (14)0.0445 (15)0.0118 (14)
C30.0670 (16)0.0430 (13)0.0422 (13)0.0147 (12)0.0277 (12)0.0018 (10)
C50.0375 (13)0.0529 (16)0.085 (2)0.0011 (12)0.0223 (13)0.0022 (14)
F4—B11.396 (3)C2—C31.389 (3)
F3—B11.387 (3)C2—C71.434 (3)
N1—C11.467 (2)C6—C51.387 (4)
N1—H1A0.89C6—H60.93
N1—H1B0.89N2—C71.150 (3)
N1—H1C0.89C4—C51.376 (4)
F2—B11.379 (3)C4—C31.379 (4)
C1—C61.370 (3)C4—H40.93
C1—C21.392 (3)C3—H30.93
F1—B11.361 (3)C5—H50.93
C1—N1—H1A109.5F1—B1—F2109.7 (2)
C1—N1—H1B109.5F1—B1—F3110.68 (19)
H1A—N1—H1B109.5F2—B1—F3111.9 (2)
C1—N1—H1C109.5F1—B1—F4109.9 (2)
H1A—N1—H1C109.5F2—B1—F4107.16 (18)
H1B—N1—H1C109.5F3—B1—F4107.42 (19)
C6—C1—C2121.1 (2)C5—C4—C3120.3 (2)
C6—C1—N1119.06 (19)C5—C4—H4119.9
C2—C1—N1119.87 (19)C3—C4—H4119.9
C3—C2—C1119.3 (2)C4—C3—C2119.7 (2)
C3—C2—C7120.2 (2)C4—C3—H3120.2
C1—C2—C7120.42 (19)C2—C3—H3120.2
C1—C6—C5119.0 (2)C4—C5—C6120.6 (2)
C1—C6—H6120.5C4—C5—H5119.7
C5—C6—H6120.5C6—C5—H5119.7
N2—C7—C2177.7 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C30.8 (3)C5—C4—C3—C21.2 (4)
N1—C1—C2—C3−179.40 (19)C1—C2—C3—C4−1.6 (3)
C6—C1—C2—C7−176.6 (2)C7—C2—C3—C4175.8 (2)
N1—C1—C2—C73.2 (3)C3—C4—C5—C60.0 (4)
C2—C1—C6—C50.4 (3)C1—C6—C5—C4−0.8 (4)
N1—C1—C6—C5−179.4 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···N2i0.892.543.179 (3)130
N1—H1A···F4ii0.892.122.896 (2)146
N1—H1B···F4iii0.892.212.993 (2)147
N1—H1C···F30.891.952.799 (2)160
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯N2i0.892.543.179 (3)130
N1—H1A⋯F4ii0.892.122.896 (2)146
N1—H1B⋯F4iii0.892.212.993 (2)147
N1—H1C⋯F30.891.952.799 (2)160

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) .

  3 in total

1.  Dielectric anisotropy of a homochiral trinuclear nickel(II) complex.

Authors:  Da-Wei Fu; Yu-Mei Song; Guo-Xi Wang; Qiong Ye; Ren-Gen Xiong; Tomoyuki Akutagawa; Takayoshi Nakamura; Philip Wai Hong Chan; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  The first metal-organic framework (MOF) of Imazethapyr and its SHG, piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties.

Authors:  Da-Wei Fu; Wen Zhang; Ren-Gen Xiong
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.390

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Crystal structure of 2-cyano-1-methyl-pyridinium perchlorate.

Authors:  Vu D Nguyen; Cameron A McCormick; Joel T Mague; Lynn V Koplitz
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-10-17

2.  Crystal structure of 2-cyano-1-methyl-pyridinium bromide.

Authors:  Vu D Nguyen; Cameron A McCormick; Robert A Pascal; Joel T Mague; Lynn V Koplitz
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-10-17

3.  Crystal structure of 2-cyano-1-methyl-pyridinium tetra-fluoro-borate.

Authors:  Francesca A Vaccaro; Lynn V Koplitz; Joel T Mague
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-09-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.