Literature DB >> 21577867

2-Cyano-anilinium bromide.

Li Zhang1.   

Abstract

In the cation of the title compound, C(7)H(7)N(2) (+)·Br(-), the nitrile group and the benzene ring are almost coplanar (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0043 Å). In the crystal, the cations and anions are connected by inter-molecular N-H⋯Br hydrogen bonds, forming a two-dimensional network parallel to (010).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 21577867      PMCID: PMC2970252          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809035223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For nitrile derivatives, see: Fu et al. (2008 ▶); Wang et al. (2002 ▶). Nitrile derivatives used in the construction of novel metal-organic frameworks. For applications of metal-organic coordination compounds, see: Fu et al. (2007 ▶); Chen et al. (2000 ▶); Fu & Xiong (2008 ▶); Xiong et al. (1999 ▶); Xie et al. (2003 ▶); Zhang et al. (2001 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H7N2 +·Br M = 199.06 Monoclinic, a = 5.7844 (12) Å b = 15.896 (3) Å c = 8.4882 (17) Å β = 92.72 (3)° V = 779.6 (3) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 5.19 mm−1 T = 298 K 0.40 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm

Data collection

Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.65, T max = 0.77 3848 measured reflections 1773 independent reflections 1581 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.034

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.025 wR(F 2) = 0.050 S = 0.87 1773 reflections 93 parameters 2 restraints H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.47 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.41 e Å−3 Absolute structure: Flack (1983 ▶), 872 Friedels pairs Flack parameter: 0.004 (13) Data collection: CrystalClear (Rigaku, 2005 ▶); cell refinement: CrystalClear; data reduction: CrystalClear; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXTL (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXTL; molecular graphics: SHELXTL; software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXTL. Crystal structure: contains datablocks I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809035223/xu2593sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablocks I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536809035223/xu2593Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H7N2+·BrF(000) = 392
Mr = 199.06Dx = 1.696 Mg m3
Monoclinic, CcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: C -2ycCell parameters from 1581 reflections
a = 5.7844 (12) Åθ = 2.6–27.5°
b = 15.896 (3) ŵ = 5.19 mm1
c = 8.4882 (17) ÅT = 298 K
β = 92.72 (3)°Needle, colourless
V = 779.6 (3) Å30.40 × 0.05 × 0.05 mm
Z = 4
Rigaku Mercury2 diffractometer1773 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1581 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.034
Detector resolution: 13.6612 pixels mm-1θmax = 27.5°, θmin = 2.6°
CCD profile fitting scansh = −7→7
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrystalClear; Rigaku, 2005)k = −20→20
Tmin = 0.65, Tmax = 0.77l = −10→11
3848 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
Least-squares matrix: fullH-atom parameters constrained
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.025w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0143P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
wR(F2) = 0.050(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
S = 0.87Δρmax = 0.47 e Å3
1773 reflectionsΔρmin = −0.41 e Å3
93 parametersExtinction correction: SHELXTL (Version 5.1; Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
2 restraintsExtinction coefficient: 0.0206 (8)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure: Flack (1983), 872 Friedels pairs
Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier mapFlack parameter: 0.004 (13)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.05750 (10)0.208462 (17)0.44566 (9)0.04064 (12)
N10.0515 (5)0.32177 (17)0.7619 (3)0.0347 (6)
H1A0.03320.29500.67010.052*
H1B−0.07130.31270.81880.052*
H1C0.17800.30270.81400.052*
C6−0.0799 (6)0.4675 (3)0.7945 (5)0.0372 (10)
H6−0.20280.44730.85030.045*
C30.2867 (8)0.5276 (3)0.6309 (5)0.0451 (11)
H30.41020.54830.57620.054*
C10.0755 (6)0.4115 (2)0.7337 (5)0.0309 (9)
C40.1322 (8)0.5822 (3)0.6917 (5)0.0500 (12)
H40.15160.63990.67880.060*
C70.4233 (6)0.3856 (2)0.5783 (4)0.0410 (8)
N20.5521 (6)0.3440 (2)0.5163 (4)0.0618 (10)
C20.2611 (6)0.4411 (3)0.6501 (4)0.0346 (9)
C5−0.0547 (7)0.5521 (3)0.7733 (5)0.0474 (12)
H5−0.16130.58940.81300.057*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.03349 (17)0.04202 (18)0.04729 (19)−0.0034 (2)0.01111 (12)−0.0112 (3)
N10.0284 (14)0.0369 (15)0.0396 (16)−0.0027 (12)0.0104 (12)−0.0036 (13)
C60.031 (2)0.043 (2)0.038 (2)−0.0023 (18)0.0075 (17)−0.0038 (18)
C30.044 (3)0.046 (3)0.046 (3)−0.012 (2)0.007 (2)0.003 (2)
C10.027 (2)0.035 (2)0.0309 (18)0.0005 (15)0.0021 (15)−0.0028 (15)
C40.065 (3)0.031 (2)0.055 (3)−0.004 (2)0.008 (2)0.003 (2)
C70.0303 (18)0.049 (2)0.044 (2)−0.0078 (17)0.0101 (16)0.0045 (18)
N20.049 (2)0.070 (2)0.069 (2)0.0068 (19)0.031 (2)0.0025 (18)
C20.032 (2)0.039 (2)0.032 (2)−0.0017 (17)0.0039 (17)0.0032 (16)
C50.056 (3)0.041 (2)0.045 (3)0.012 (2)0.006 (2)−0.007 (2)
N1—C11.455 (5)C3—C21.393 (6)
N1—H1A0.8900C3—H30.9300
N1—H1B0.8900C1—C21.396 (5)
N1—H1C0.8900C4—C51.396 (6)
C6—C51.366 (6)C4—H40.9300
C6—C11.382 (5)C7—N21.142 (4)
C6—H60.9300C7—C21.444 (6)
C3—C41.365 (6)C5—H50.9300
C1—N1—H1A109.5C6—C1—N1120.1 (3)
C1—N1—H1B109.5C2—C1—N1119.7 (3)
H1A—N1—H1B109.5C3—C4—C5120.4 (4)
C1—N1—H1C109.5C3—C4—H4119.8
H1A—N1—H1C109.5C5—C4—H4119.8
H1B—N1—H1C109.5N2—C7—C2177.0 (4)
C5—C6—C1120.6 (4)C3—C2—C1118.7 (4)
C5—C6—H6119.7C3—C2—C7118.6 (4)
C1—C6—H6119.7C1—C2—C7122.6 (4)
C4—C3—C2120.5 (4)C6—C5—C4119.5 (4)
C4—C3—H3119.7C6—C5—H5120.2
C2—C3—H3119.7C4—C5—H5120.2
C6—C1—C2120.2 (4)
C5—C6—C1—C20.2 (6)N1—C1—C2—C3−177.0 (4)
C5—C6—C1—N1177.8 (4)C6—C1—C2—C7−177.4 (4)
C2—C3—C4—C5−0.4 (7)N1—C1—C2—C75.0 (6)
C4—C3—C2—C1−0.5 (6)C1—C6—C5—C4−1.1 (7)
C4—C3—C2—C7177.6 (4)C3—C4—C5—C61.2 (7)
C6—C1—C2—C30.6 (6)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N1—H1A···Br10.892.363.234 (3)168
N1—H1B···Br1i0.892.473.355 (3)173
N1—H1C···Br1ii0.892.423.286 (3)164
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
N1—H1A⋯Br10.892.363.234 (3)168
N1—H1B⋯Br1i0.892.473.355 (3)173
N1—H1C⋯Br1ii0.892.423.286 (3)164

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  Dielectric anisotropy of a homochiral trinuclear nickel(II) complex.

Authors:  Da-Wei Fu; Yu-Mei Song; Guo-Xi Wang; Qiong Ye; Ren-Gen Xiong; Tomoyuki Akutagawa; Takayoshi Nakamura; Philip Wai Hong Chan; Songping D Huang
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  The first metal-organic framework (MOF) of Imazethapyr and its SHG, piezoelectric and ferroelectric properties.

Authors:  Da-Wei Fu; Wen Zhang; Ren-Gen Xiong
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.390

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  2-Cyano-1-methyl-pyridinium nitrate.

Authors:  Lynn V Koplitz; Joel T Mague; Michael N Kammer; Cameron A McCormick; Heather E Renfro; David J Vumbaco
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-05-05

2.  2-Cyano-anilinium iodide.

Authors:  David J Vumbaco; Michael N Kammer; Lynn V Koplitz; Joel T Mague
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-07-20

3.  Crystal structure of 2-cyano-1-methyl-pyridinium bromide.

Authors:  Vu D Nguyen; Cameron A McCormick; Robert A Pascal; Joel T Mague; Lynn V Koplitz
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun       Date:  2015-10-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.