Literature DB >> 26588601

Refinement of the Sugar-Phosphate Backbone Torsion Beta for AMBER Force Fields Improves the Description of Z- and B-DNA.

Marie Zgarbová1, Jiří Šponer1,2, Michal Otyepka1, Thomas E Cheatham3, Rodrigo Galindo-Murillo3, Petr Jurečka1.   

Abstract

Z-DNA duplexes are a particularly complicated test case for current force fields. We performed a set of explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with various AMBER force field parametrizations including our recent refinements of the ε/ζ and glycosidic torsions. None of these force fields described the ZI/ZII and other backbone substates correctly, and all of them underpredicted the population of the important ZI substate. We show that this underprediction can be attributed to an inaccurate potential for the sugar-phosphate backbone torsion angle β. We suggest a refinement of this potential, β(OL1), which was derived using our recently introduced methodology that includes conformation-dependent solvation effects. The new potential significantly increases the stability of the dominant ZI backbone substate and improves the overall description of the Z-DNA backbone. It also has a positive (albeit small) impact on another important DNA form, the antiparallel guanine quadruplex (G-DNA), and improves the description of the canonical B-DNA backbone by increasing the population of BII backbone substates, providing a better agreement with experiment. We recommend using β(OL1) in combination with our previously introduced corrections, εζ(OL1) and χ(OL4), (the combination being named OL15) as a possible alternative to the current β torsion potential for more accurate modeling of nucleic acids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26588601     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  90 in total

1.  Polarizable force field for RNA based on the classical drude oscillator.

Authors:  Justin A Lemkul; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Computational Investigation of APOBEC3H Substrate Orientation and Selectivity.

Authors:  Mark A Hix; G Andrés Cisneros
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.991

3.  Silver(I)-mediated base pairing in parallel-stranded DNA involving the luminescent cytosine analog 1,3-diaza-2-oxophenoxazine.

Authors:  Isabell Schönrath; Vladimir B Tsvetkov; Timofei S Zatsepin; Andrey V Aralov; Jens Müller
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.358

4.  Predicting Site-Binding Modes of Ions and Water to Nucleic Acids Using Molecular Solvation Theory.

Authors:  George M Giambaşu; David A Case; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  8-Oxo-guanine DNA damage induces transcription errors by escaping two distinct fidelity control checkpoints of RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  Kirill A Konovalov; Fátima Pardo-Avila; Carmen Ka Man Tse; Juntaek Oh; Dong Wang; Xuhui Huang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  High-resolution EPR distance measurements on RNA and DNA with the non-covalent Ǵ spin label.

Authors:  Marcel Heinz; Nicole Erlenbach; Lukas S Stelzl; Grace Thierolf; Nilesh R Kamble; Snorri Th Sigurdsson; Thomas F Prisner; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Biologically important conformational features of DNA as interpreted by quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics computations of its simple fragments.

Authors:  V Poltev; V M Anisimov; V Dominguez; E Gonzalez; A Deriabina; D Garcia; F Rivas; N A Polteva
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 1.810

Review 8.  New tricks for old dogs: improving the accuracy of biomolecular force fields by pair-specific corrections to non-bonded interactions.

Authors:  Jejoong Yoo; Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.676

9.  Oxidative damage to epigenetically methylated sites affects DNA stability, dynamics and enzymatic demethylation.

Authors:  David R Gruber; Joanna J Toner; Heather L Miears; Andrey V Shernyukov; Alexey S Kiryutin; Alexander A Lomzov; Anton V Endutkin; Inga R Grin; Darya V Petrova; Maxim S Kupryushkin; Alexandra V Yurkovskaya; Eric C Johnson; Mark Okon; Elena G Bagryanskaya; Dmitry O Zharkov; Serge L Smirnov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Insilico direct folding of thrombin-binding aptamer G-quadruplex at all-atom level.

Authors:  Changwon Yang; Mandar Kulkarni; Manho Lim; Youngshang Pak
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.