Literature DB >> 30289469

Oxidative damage to epigenetically methylated sites affects DNA stability, dynamics and enzymatic demethylation.

David R Gruber1, Joanna J Toner1, Heather L Miears1, Andrey V Shernyukov2,3, Alexey S Kiryutin3,4, Alexander A Lomzov3,5, Anton V Endutkin3,5, Inga R Grin3,5, Darya V Petrova3,5, Maxim S Kupryushkin5, Alexandra V Yurkovskaya3,4, Eric C Johnson6, Mark Okon7, Elena G Bagryanskaya2,3, Dmitry O Zharkov3,5, Serge L Smirnov1.   

Abstract

DNA damage can affect various regulatory elements of the genome, with the consequences for DNA structure, dynamics, and interaction with proteins remaining largely unexplored. We used solution NMR spectroscopy, restrained and free molecular dynamics to obtain the structures and investigate dominant motions for a set of DNA duplexes containing CpG sites permuted with combinations of 5-methylcytosine (mC), the primary epigenetic base, and 8-oxoguanine (oxoG), an abundant DNA lesion. Guanine oxidation significantly changed the motion in both hemimethylated and fully methylated DNA, increased base pair breathing, induced BI→BII transition in the backbone 3' to the oxoG and reduced the variability of shift and tilt helical parameters. UV melting experiments corroborated the NMR and molecular dynamics results, showing significant destabilization of all methylated contexts by oxoG. Notably, some dynamic and thermodynamic effects were not additive in the fully methylated oxidized CpG, indicating that the introduced modifications interact with each other. Finally, we show that the presence of oxoG biases the recognition of methylated CpG dinucleotides by ROS1, a plant enzyme involved in epigenetic DNA demethylation, in favor of the oxidized DNA strand. Thus, the conformational and dynamic effects of spurious DNA oxidation in the regulatory CpG dinucleotide can have far-reaching biological consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30289469      PMCID: PMC6237784          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  73 in total

Review 1.  Recognition of specific DNA sequences.

Authors:  C W Garvie; C Wolberger
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Biomarkers of oxidative damage to DNA and repair.

Authors:  Steffen Loft; Pernille Høgh Danielsen; Lone Mikkelsen; Lotte Risom; Lykke Forchhammer; Peter Møller
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.407

3.  An efficient method for sampling the essential subspace of proteins.

Authors:  A Amadei; A B Linssen; B L de Groot; D M van Aalten; H J Berendsen
Journal:  J Biomol Struct Dyn       Date:  1996-02

Review 4.  The ABCs of molecular dynamics simulations on B-DNA, circa 2012.

Authors:  David L Beveridge; Thomas E Cheatham; Mihaly Mezei
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Oxidized guanine lesions as modulators of gene transcription. Altered p50 binding affinity and repair shielding by 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine lesions in the NF-kappaB promoter element.

Authors:  M Katie Hailer-Morrison; J Michelle Kotler; Brooke D Martin; Kent D Sugden
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Cytosine methylation and CpG, TpG (CpA) and TpA frequencies.

Authors:  Kamel Jabbari; Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Impact of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine on methylation of the CpG site by Dnmt3a.

Authors:  Diana V Maltseva; Alexander A Baykov; Albert Jeltsch; Elizaveta S Gromova
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Comparative analysis of baseline 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in mammalian cell DNA, by different methods in different laboratories: an approach to consensus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Oxidative damage in telomeric DNA disrupts recognition by TRF1 and TRF2.

Authors:  Patricia L Opresko; Jinshui Fan; Shamika Danzy; David M Wilson; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Nontarget DNA binding shapes the dynamic landscape for enzymatic recognition of DNA damage.

Authors:  Joshua I Friedman; Ananya Majumdar; James T Stivers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  4 in total

1.  Epigenetic Marks, DNA Damage Markers, or Both? The Impact of Desiccation and Accelerated Aging on Nucleobase Modifications in Plant Genomic DNA.

Authors:  Beata P Plitta-Michalak; Monika Litkowiec; Marcin Michalak
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 2.  The impact of epigenetic information on genome evolution.

Authors:  Soojin V Yi; Michael A D Goodisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 6.671

Review 3.  Clays as Vehicles for Drug Photostability.

Authors:  Monsuêto C da Rocha; Thais Galdino; Pollyana Trigueiro; Luzia M C Honorio; Raquel de Melo Barbosa; Santiago M Carrasco; Edson C Silva-Filho; Josy A Osajima; César Viseras
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 4.  Molecular Structure, Binding Affinity, and Biological Activity in the Epigenome.

Authors:  Balázs Zoltán Zsidó; Csaba Hetényi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.