| Literature DB >> 26584655 |
Moses Galukande1, Joseph Kamara2, Violet Ndabwire3, Elisabeth Leistey4, Cecilia Valla5, Sam Luboga6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/C) has long been practiced in various parts of the world. The practice is still prevalent in 29 countries on the African continent despite decades of campaigning to eradicate it. The approaches for eradication have been multi-pronged, including but not limited to, health risk campaigns teaching about the health consequences for the girls and the women, recruitment of change agents from within the communities and the enforcement of legal mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to analyse the impact of an 18 month long campaign to eradicate or reduce FGM/C in a rural predominantly Masai community.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26584655 PMCID: PMC4653879 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2439-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Participants recruitment flow chart
Fig. 2Illustrating project interventions, activities and selected outcomes
Mukulat anti female genital mutilation endline household survey participants’ demographics
| Variable | Women ( | Men ( | Subtotal | Totala | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Mean | 34 years | 43 years | ||
| SD | 12 | 15 | |||
| Ward | |||||
| Musa | 528 | 345 | 873 | ||
| Mwandet | 147 | 119 | 266 | 1139 | |
| Village | |||||
| Engurtoto | 176 | 105 | 281 | ||
| Imbibia | 84 | 54 | 138 | ||
| Engalaoni | 69 | 59 | 128 | ||
| Losikito | 199 | 136 | 335 | ||
| Olchorovusi | 45 | 23 | 68 | ||
| Oltushula | 21 | 23 | 44 | ||
| Likamba | 59 | 40 | 99 | ||
| Nengungu | 22 | 15 | 37 | 1130 | |
| Education | |||||
| Never schooled | 286 | 172 | 458 | ||
| Primary level only | 347 | 253 | 600 | ||
| Secondary school level only | 1 | 33 | 34 | ||
| Tertiary | 3 | 6 | 9 | 1101 | |
| Marital status | Single | 27 | 45 | 72 | |
| Married | 598 | 415 | 1013 | ||
| Divorced/separated | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||
| Widow | 47 | 0 | 47 | 1064 | |
aTotals less than 1139 were due to non responses or missing data
The key findings from the endline household survey
| Variable | Women | Men |
|---|---|---|
| Those who stated that girls marry below 18 years in the village | 353 (52 %) | 248 (53 %) |
| Women who self-reported undergoing FGM | 467 (69.2 %) | - |
| Age at which FGM had been done | ||
| ≤ 11 years | 107 | - |
| 12–15years | 169 | - |
| ≥ 16 years | 143 | - |
| Those who knew of the FGM health risks | 475 (70.4 %) | 347 (74.8 %) |
| Those who believed FGM had positive effects | 111 (16.4 %) | 81 (17.5 %) |
| Those that said they had abandoned early marriage practices | 623 (92.3 %) | 413 (89 %) |
| Those that knew advocacy subcommittees existed in their area | 178 (26.4 %) | 103 (22.2 %) |
| Those with knowledge of children rights and protection laws | 277 (41 %) | 206 (44.4 %) |
| Those that said yes to adhering to children rights laws | 239 (35.5 %) | 199 (42.9 %) |
| Those optimistic about FGM eradication | 547 (81 %) | 349 (75.4 %) |
| Those in favor of eradication | 563 (83.4 %) | 384 (82.8 %) |
| Those supportive of ARP without FGM | 279 (41.3 %) | 168 (36.2 %) |
| Those with HH members who have participated in anti-FGM | 159 (23.6 %) | 115 (24.8 %) |
| Those who answered that the project belongs to the community | 538 (79.7 %) | 376 (81 %) |
FGM Female Genital Mutilation/cutting
ARP Alternative Rite Passage
HH Household
Comparing some key baseline and endline household survey findings
| Project Outcomes | KAP Variables | HHS Baseline | HHS Endline |
| PRRa | CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community empowerment | Those who knew FGM effects | 54 % (536) | 72 %(822) | <0.001 | 1.333 | 1.50–2.30 |
| Those in favour of FGM eradicated | 62 % (627) | 74.4 %(847) | <0.001 | 1.170 | 1.10–1.240 | |
| Those who had participated in anti FGM campaign activities | 23.2 % (235) | 24.1 % (274) | 0.6402 | 1.037 | 0.80–1.210 | |
| ARP Approach | Those who thought culture could still be maintained without FGM | 16.6 % (168) | 30 % (302) | <0.001 | 1.600 | 0.65–1.34 |
| Those who thought girls can be prepared for marriage without undergoing FGM | 30.2 % (306) | 39.2 %(447) | <0.001 | 1.298 | 1.154–1.46 | |
| Alternate IGA for FGM practitioners | Those who knew FGM practitioners that left practice and engaged in other IGA | 28.4 % (288) | - | - | - |
aPRR – Prevalence rate Ratio showing the number of times follow-up rates are higher/lower relative to the baseline
IGA – Income generating activities
Responses for 154 individual school children from two primary schools in Mukulat (Engalaoni and Nengungu) endline survey
| Gender | Class | Number | Knew FGM Health risks | Yes to FGM eradication | Marry uncut | Knew of girls undergoing ARP | Awareness of Anti-FGM Tanzania law | Knew of girls who rejected FGMb | Knew of FGM practitioners who publicly rejected FGMc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Girls | P6 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | A few | Nil | None | None |
| P5 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 02 | Nil | None | None | |
| P4 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 12 | Nil | None | None | |
| P3 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 05 | Nil | None | 2 knew of them | |
| 80 | All knew | All said yes | All said yes | All were not aware | None were aware | - | - | ||
| Boys | P6 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | Not heard of it | 0 | 24 | 4 |
| P5 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| P4 | 22 | 24 | 20 | 15a | 0 | 22 | 22 | 6 | |
| P3 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 0 | |
| 70 |
a2 said they won’t marry uncut woman and 5 did not declare any opinion
bAll the boys stated that even though the girls objected to FGM/C, they are forced or coerced, punished and shamed
cA few stated that they knew of ‘Ex-FGM practitioners that are back to practicing
P stands for primary class
Fig. 3Illustrating the linkages, factors and drivers of school children drop outs