Literature DB >> 33406158

Trend in female genital mutilation and its associated adverse birth outcomes: A 10-year retrospective birth registry study in Northern Tanzania.

Issa Rashid Suleiman1,2, Eusebious Maro1,2, Benjamin C Shayo1,2, Julius Pius Alloyce3, Gileard Masenga1,2, Michael J Mahande4, Bariki Mchome1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 200 million women and girls were reported to have undergone female genital mutilation worldwide in 2015.UNICEF's data based on household survey estimates 15% of women from 15-49 years have undergone FGM from year 2004-2015. Despite this, reliable data on trend of prevalence of female genital mutilation and its associated birth outcomes have not been documented in Tanzania. This study aimed at determining the trends of female genital mutilation and associated maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in northern Tanzania.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using maternally-linked data from Kilimanjaro Christian Medical birth registry involving 30,286 women who gave birth to singletons from 2004-2014. The prevalence of female genital mutilation was computed as proportion of women with female genital mutilation yearly over 10 years. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for adverse birth outcomes associated with female genital mutilation were estimated using multivariable logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Over the 10-year period, the prevalence of female genital mutilation averaged 15.4%. Female genital mutilation decreased from 23.6% in 2005 to 10.6% in 2014. Female genital mutilation was associated with increased odds for caesarean section (aOR1.26; 95% CI: 1.18-1.34), post-partum haemorrhage (aOR 1.31; 95% CI: 1.10-1.57) and long hospital stay (aOR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.14-1.29). Female genital mutilation also increased women's likelihood of delivering an infant with low Apgar score at 5th minute (aOR 1.60; 95% CI: 1.37-1.89).FGM type III and IV had increased odds of caesarean section, episiotomy and prolonged duration of hospital stay as compared to FGM type I and II, although the association was statistically insignificant.
CONCLUSION: Female genital mutilation prevalence has declined over the study period. Our study has demonstrated that postpartum haemorrhage, delivery by caesarean section, long maternal hospital stays and low APGAR score are associated with FGM. Initiatives to mitigate FGM practice should be strengthened further to reduce/eliminate this practice. Moreover, surgical interventions to improve severe form FGM are welcomed to improve the aforementioned aspects of obstetric outcome in this locality.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33406158      PMCID: PMC7787528          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  12 in total

1.  Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: WHO collaborative prospective study in six African countries.

Authors:  Emily Banks; Olav Meirik; Tim Farley; Oluwole Akande; Heli Bathija; Mohamed Ali
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Trends in the prevalence of female genital mutilation and its effect on delivery outcomes in the kassena-nankana district of northern ghana.

Authors:  Ar Oduro; P Ansah; A Hodgson; Tm Afful; F Baiden; P Adongo; Ka Koram
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2006-09

3.  Female genital cutting in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania: changing attitudes?

Authors:  Sia E Msuya; Elizabeth Mbizvo; Akhtar Hussain; Johanne Sundby; Noel E Sam; Babill Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of women with FGM I and II in San Camillo Hospital, Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Antonio Frega; Giuliana Puzio; Paolo Maniglio; Angelica Catalano; Giusi Natalia Milazzo; Danila Lombardi; Henri Nitiema; Paola Bianchi
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Are obstetric outcomes affected by female genital mutilation?

Authors:  Aswini A Balachandran; Swapna Duvalla; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Obstetric care of women with female genital mutilation attending a specialized clinic in a tertiary center.

Authors:  Jasmine Abdulcadir; Adeline Dugerdil; Michal Yaron; Olivier Irion; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 7.  Research gaps in the care of women with female genital mutilation: an analysis.

Authors:  J Abdulcadir; M I Rodriguez; L Say
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006-2012: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Nesrin Varol; Angela Dawson; Sabera Turkmani; John J Hall; Susie Nanayakkara; Greg Jenkins; Caroline S E Homer; Kevin McGeechan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Sequela of female genital mutilation on birth outcomes in Jijiga town, Ethiopian Somali region: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kiros Gebremicheal; Fisehaye Alemseged; Haimanot Ewunetu; Daniel Tolossa; Abdibari Ma'alin; Mahlet Yewondwessen; Samuel Melaku
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Eradicating female genital mutilation and cutting in Tanzania: an observational study.

Authors:  Moses Galukande; Joseph Kamara; Violet Ndabwire; Elisabeth Leistey; Cecilia Valla; Sam Luboga
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  The global prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of national, regional, facility, and school-based studies.

Authors:  Leen Farouki; Zeinab El-Dirani; Sawsan Abdulrahim; Christelle Akl; Chaza Akik; Stephen J McCall
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 11.613

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.