Literature DB >> 11555430

The long-term reproductive health consequences of female genital cutting in rural Gambia: a community-based survey.

L Morison1, C Scherf, G Ekpo, K Paine, B West, R Coleman, G Walraven.   

Abstract

This paper examines the association between traditional practices of female genital cutting (FGC) and adult women's reproductive morbidity in rural Gambia. In 1999, we conducted a cross-sectional community survey of 1348 women aged 15-54 years, to estimate the prevalence of reproductive morbidity on the basis of women's reports, a gynaecological examination and laboratory analysis of specimens. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to compare the prevalence of each morbidity between cut and uncut women adjusting for possible confounders. A total of 1157 women consented to gynaecological examination and 58% had signs of genital cutting. There was a high level of agreement between reported circumcision status and that found on examination (97% agreement). The majority of operations consisted of clitoridectomy and excision of the labia minora (WHO classification type II) and were performed between the ages of 4 and 7 years. The practice of genital cutting was highly associated with ethnic group for two of the three main ethnic groups, making the effects of ethnic group and cutting difficult to distinguish. Women who had undergone FGC had a significantly higher prevalence of bacterial vaginosis (BV) [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25-2.18] and a substantially higher prevalence of herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV2) [adjusted OR=4.71; 95% CI 3.46-6.42]. The higher prevalence of HSV2 suggests that cut women may be at increased risk of HIV infection. Commonly cited negative consequences of FGC such as damage to the perineum or anus, vulval tumours (such as Bartholin's cysts and excessive keloid formation), painful sex, infertility, prolapse and other reproductive tract infections (RTIs) were not significantly more common in cut women. The relationship between FGC and long-term reproductive morbidity remains unclear, especially in settings where type II cutting predominates. Efforts to eradicate the practice should incorporate a human rights approach rather than rely solely on the damaging health consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11555430     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2001.00749.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Med Int Health        ISSN: 1360-2276            Impact factor:   2.622


  44 in total

1.  The relationship between female genital cutting and obstetric fistulae.

Authors:  Andrew Browning; Jenifer E Allsworth; L Lewis Wall
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Trends in the prevalence of female genital mutilation and its effect on delivery outcomes in the kassena-nankana district of northern ghana.

Authors:  Ar Oduro; P Ansah; A Hodgson; Tm Afful; F Baiden; P Adongo; Ka Koram
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2006-09

3.  Women's reproductive health and depression: a community survey in the Gambia, West Africa.

Authors:  Rosalind Coleman; Linda Morison; Katie Paine; Richard A Powell; Gijs Walraven
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  Reliability of self reported form of female genital mutilation and WHO classification: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Susan Elmusharaf; Nagla Elhadi; Lars Almroth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-27

5.  SUPPORT FOR THE CONTINUATION OF FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION AMONG ADOLESCENTS IN JIMMA ZONE, SOUTHWEST ETHIOPIA.

Authors:  Abebe G Mariam; Assefa Hailemariam; Tefera Belachew; Kifle W Michael; David Lindstrom
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2009

6.  Estimating the obstetric costs of female genital mutilation in six African countries.

Authors:  David Bishai; Yung-Ting Bonnenfant; Manal Darwish; Taghreed Adam; Heli Bathija; Elise Johansen; Dale Huntington
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 9.408

7.  Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the United States: Updated Estimates of Women and Girls at Risk, 2012.

Authors:  Howard Goldberg; Paul Stupp; Ekwutosi Okoroh; Ghenet Besera; David Goodman; Isabella Danel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Female genital mutilation: perceptions of healthcare professionals and the perspective of the migrant families.

Authors:  Adriana Kaplan-Marcusán; Natividad Fernández Del Rio; Juana Moreno-Navarro; Ma José Castany-Fàbregas; Marta Ruiz Nogueras; Laura Muñoz-Ortiz; Eliana Monguí-Avila; Pere Torán-Monserrat
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Perception of primary health professionals about female genital mutilation: from healthcare to intercultural competence.

Authors:  Adriana Kaplan-Marcusan; Pere Torán-Monserrat; Juana Moreno-Navarro; Ma Jose Castany Fàbregas; Laura Muñoz-Ortiz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Prevalence and associated factors of female genital mutilation among Somali refugees in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Getnet Mitike; Wakgari Deressa
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.