| Literature DB >> 23737795 |
R Elise B Johansen1, Nafissatou J Diop, Glenn Laverack, Els Leye.
Abstract
The prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is reducing in almost all countries in which it is a traditional practice. There are huge variations between countries and communities though, ranging from no change at all to countries and communities where the practice has been more than halved from one generation to the next. Various interventions implemented over the last 30-40 years are believed to have been instrumental in stimulating this reduction, even though in most cases the decrease in prevalence has been slow. This raises questions about the efficacy of interventions to eliminate FGM and an urgent need to channel the limited resources available, where it can make the most difference in the abandonment of FGM. This paper is intended to contribute to the design of more effective interventions by assessing existing knowledge of what works and what does not and discusses some of the most common approaches that have been evaluated: health risk approaches, conversion of excisers, training of health professionals as change agents, alternative rituals, community-led approaches, public statements, and legal measures.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23737795 PMCID: PMC3655658 DOI: 10.1155/2013/348248
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obstet Gynecol Int ISSN: 1687-9597
A summary of the main advantages and challenges of popular approaches towards the abandonment of FGM.
| Approach | Advantages and potential successful results | Risks and disadvantages | Measures to overcome risks and disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health risk info | (i) Stimulate resistance to FGM among | (i) Medicalization | (i) Ensure health information is locally adapted, communicated nondjudgementally by a reliable source and combined with care for complications gibing space for reflection and experience exchange |
|
| |||
| Conversion of excisers | (i) Reduce availability of excisers | (i) Does not reduce demand for FGM | (i) Ensure that work with excisers is only an aspect of a wider approach adapted to their roles in the particular community. |
|
| |||
| Training of health professionals | (i) Improved quality of care | (i) Resistance to work against FGM | (i) Comprehensive training for prevention and management into standard curricula |
|
| |||
| Alternative rites | (i) Facilitate community ownership and support, as it maintains key cultural practice | (i) Only viable in communities in which FGM is a part of a rite of passage | (i) Use only where fit into local culture |
|
| |||
| Community-led | (i) Community own problem and solution | (i) The community might decide to change, rather than to abandon, the practice. | (i) Ensure community ownership and adaptation |
|
| |||
| Public statements | (i) Create a sense of social change among a group | (i) Public statements by subgroups only lack of community ownership | (i) Ensure community-wide support |
|
| |||
| Legal measures | (i) Create an enabling framework | (i) Practice can go underground | (i) Ensure community support for the law |