PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a sterilizable multichannel endorectal coil (ERC) for use in combination with an external surface array (ESA) for high-resolution anatomical and functional studies of the prostate at 7T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A two-loop ERC (ERC-2L) and a microstrip-loop ERC (ERC-ML) were compared at 7T in terms of transmit and receive performance. The best-performing ERC was evaluated alone and in combination with the ESA through 1) simulations on both phantom and an anatomically correct numerical human model to assess B1+ transmit and specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiencies, and 2) phantom experiments to calculate B1+ transmit efficiency and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Phantom studies were also performed to look at heating when using the ERC as a transmitter and for comparing the new coil against a single-channel balloon-type ERC (ERC-b). High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions were performed on a single healthy subject using the two-channel ERC combined with the ESA. RESULTS: Compared to the ERC-ML, the ERC-2L demonstrated 20% higher SAR efficiency and higher SNR 3 cm from the coil. The presence of a tuned and detuned ERC-2L did not alter the peak local SAR of the ESA alone; however, the detuned ERC-2L had 45% less peak local SAR around the rectum compared to the tuned ERC-2L. The receive-only version of the ERC-2L improved the SNR 4.7-fold and 1.3-fold compared to the ESA and ERC-b, respectively. In combination with the ESA, the ERC-2L supported in-plane voxel-size of 0.36 × 0.36 mm(2) in T2 -weighted anatomic imaging. CONCLUSION: The reusable ERC-2L combined with an ESA offers a high SNR imaging platform for translational studies of the prostate at 7T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:1279-1287.
PURPOSE: To develop and evaluate a sterilizable multichannel endorectal coil (ERC) for use in combination with an external surface array (ESA) for high-resolution anatomical and functional studies of the prostate at 7T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A two-loop ERC (ERC-2L) and a microstrip-loop ERC (ERC-ML) were compared at 7T in terms of transmit and receive performance. The best-performing ERC was evaluated alone and in combination with the ESA through 1) simulations on both phantom and an anatomically correct numerical human model to assess B1+ transmit and specific absorption rate (SAR) efficiencies, and 2) phantom experiments to calculate B1+ transmit efficiency and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Phantom studies were also performed to look at heating when using the ERC as a transmitter and for comparing the new coil against a single-channel balloon-type ERC (ERC-b). High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisitions were performed on a single healthy subject using the two-channel ERC combined with the ESA. RESULTS: Compared to the ERC-ML, the ERC-2L demonstrated 20% higher SAR efficiency and higher SNR 3 cm from the coil. The presence of a tuned and detuned ERC-2L did not alter the peak local SAR of the ESA alone; however, the detuned ERC-2L had 45% less peak local SAR around the rectum compared to the tuned ERC-2L. The receive-only version of the ERC-2L improved the SNR 4.7-fold and 1.3-fold compared to the ESA and ERC-b, respectively. In combination with the ESA, the ERC-2L supported in-plane voxel-size of 0.36 × 0.36 mm(2) in T2 -weighted anatomic imaging. CONCLUSION: The reusable ERC-2L combined with an ESA offers a high SNR imaging platform for translational studies of the prostate at 7T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;43:1279-1287.
Authors: C S Arteaga de Castro; B van den Bergen; P R Luijten; U A van der Heide; M van Vulpen; D W J Klomp Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jennifer M Hensel; Cynthia Ménard; Peter W M Chung; Michael F Milosevic; Anna Kirilova; Joanne L Moseley; Masoom A Haider; Kristy K Brock Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Gregory J Metzger; Carl Snyder; Can Akgun; Tommy Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Jurgen J Fütterer; Thomas Hambrock; Satoru Takahashi; Tom W J Scheenen; Henkjan J Huisman; Christina A Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa; Ben C Knipscheer; Lambertus A L M Kiemeney; J Alfred Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: C J Snyder; L DelaBarre; G J Metzger; P-F van de Moortele; C Akgun; K Ugurbil; J T Vaughan Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: J Thomas Vaughan; Carl J Snyder; Lance J DelaBarre; Patrick J Bolan; Jinfeng Tian; Lizann Bolinger; Gregor Adriany; Peter Andersen; John Strupp; Kamil Ugurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Iclal Ocak; Marcelino Bernardo; Greg Metzger; Tristan Barrett; Peter Pinto; Paul S Albert; Peter L Choyke Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Yongbok Kim; I-Chow J Hsu; Jean Pouliot; Susan Moyher Noworolski; Daniel B Vigneron; John Kurhanewicz Journal: Med Phys Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger; Russell L Lagore; Steve Jungst; Lance DelaBarre; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Kamil Ugurbil; Ergin Atalar; Yigitcan Eryaman Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-06-23 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Xiaoxuan He; M Arcan Ertürk; Andrea Grant; Xiaoping Wu; Russell L Lagore; Lance DelaBarre; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Gregor Adriany; Eddie J Auerbach; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: M Arcan Ertürk; Xiaoping Wu; Yiğitcan Eryaman; Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Edward J Auerbach; Russell L Lagore; Lance DelaBarre; J Thomas Vaughan; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: M Arcan Ertürk; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Gregor Adriany; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bart R Steensma; Ingmar Voogt; Abe J van der Werf; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Peter R Luijten; Dennis W J Klomp; Alexander J E Raaijmakers Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Bart Steensma; Pierre-Francois van de Moortele; Arcan Ertürk; Andrea Grant; Gregor Adriany; Peter Luijten; Dennis Klomp; Nico van den Berg; Gregory Metzger; Alexander Raaijmakers Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 4.668