PURPOSE: In this study, we investigate a strategy to reduce the local specific absorption rate (SAR) while keeping B 1 + constant inside the region of interest (ROI) at the ultra-high field (B0 ≥ 7T) MRI. METHODS: Locally raising the resonance structure under the discontinuity (i.e., creating a bump) increases the distance between the accumulated charges and the tissue. As a result, it reduces the electric field and local SAR generated by these charges inside the tissue. The B 1 + at a point that is sufficiently far from the coil, however, is not affected by this modification. In this study, three different resonant elements (i.e., loop coil, snake antenna, and fractionated dipole [FD]) are investigated. For experimental validation, a bumped FD is further investigated at 10.5T. After the validation, the transmit performances of eight-channel arrays of each element are compared through electromagnetic (EM) simulations. RESULTS: Introducing a bump reduced the peak 10g-averaged SAR by 21, 26, 23% for the loop and snake antenna at 7T, and FD at 10.5T, respectively. In addition, eight-channel bumped FD array at 10.5T had a 27% lower peak 10g-averaged SAR in a realistic human body simulation (i.e., prostate imaging) compared to an eight-channel FD array. CONCLUSION: In this study, we investigated a simple design strategy based on adding bumps to a resonant element to reduce the local SAR while maintaining B 1 + inside an ROI. As an example, we modified an FD and performed EM simulations and phantom experiments with a 10.5T scanner. Results show that the peak 10g-averaged SAR can be reduced more than 25%.
PURPOSE: In this study, we investigate a strategy to reduce the local specific absorption rate (SAR) while keeping B 1 + constant inside the region of interest (ROI) at the ultra-high field (B0 ≥ 7T) MRI. METHODS: Locally raising the resonance structure under the discontinuity (i.e., creating a bump) increases the distance between the accumulated charges and the tissue. As a result, it reduces the electric field and local SAR generated by these charges inside the tissue. The B 1 + at a point that is sufficiently far from the coil, however, is not affected by this modification. In this study, three different resonant elements (i.e., loop coil, snake antenna, and fractionated dipole [FD]) are investigated. For experimental validation, a bumped FD is further investigated at 10.5T. After the validation, the transmit performances of eight-channel arrays of each element are compared through electromagnetic (EM) simulations. RESULTS: Introducing a bump reduced the peak 10g-averaged SAR by 21, 26, 23% for the loop and snake antenna at 7T, and FD at 10.5T, respectively. In addition, eight-channel bumped FD array at 10.5T had a 27% lower peak 10g-averaged SAR in a realistic human body simulation (i.e., prostate imaging) compared to an eight-channel FD array. CONCLUSION: In this study, we investigated a simple design strategy based on adding bumps to a resonant element to reduce the local SAR while maintaining B 1 + inside an ROI. As an example, we modified an FD and performed EM simulations and phantom experiments with a 10.5T scanner. Results show that the peak 10g-averaged SAR can be reduced more than 25%.
Authors: Gregor Adriany; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Florian Wiesinger; Steen Moeller; John P Strupp; Peter Andersen; Carl Snyder; Xiaoliang Zhang; Wei Chen; Klaas P Pruessmann; Peter Boesiger; Tommy Vaughan; Kāmil Uğurbil Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Bing Wu; Chunsheng Wang; Roland Krug; Douglas A Kelley; Duan Xu; Yong Pang; Suchandrima Banerjee; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson; Sharmila Majumdar; Xiaoliang Zhang Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2009-08-25 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Wei Zhao; Julien Cohen-Adad; Jonathan R Polimeni; Boris Keil; Bastien Guerin; Kawin Setsompop; Peter Serano; Azma Mareyam; Philipp Hoecht; Lawrence L Wald Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: M Arcan Ertürk; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Gregor Adriany; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregory J Metzger Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-02-17 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Oliver Kraff; Andreas K Bitz; Stefan Kruszona; Stephan Orzada; Lena C Schaefer; Jens M Theysohn; Stefan Maderwald; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Carel C van Leeuwen; Bart R Steensma; Dennis W J Klomp; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Alexander J E Raaijmakers Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-08-19 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Navid P Gandji; Christopher T Sica; Michael T Lanagan; Myung-Kyun Woo; Lance DelaBarre; Jerahmie Radder; Bei Zhang; Riccardo Lattanzi; Gregor Adriany; Kamil Ugurbil; Qing X Yang Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2021-07-17 Impact factor: 3.737
Authors: Karthik Lakshmanan; Martijn Cloos; Ryan Brown; Riccardo Lattanzi; Daniel K Sodickson; Graham C Wiggins Journal: Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng Date: 2020-09-07 Impact factor: 1.176