Literature DB >> 32767392

Improving radiofrequency power and specific absorption rate management with bumped transmit elements in ultra-high field MRI.

Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh1,2,3, Gregor Adriany3, Gregory J Metzger3, Russell L Lagore3, Steve Jungst3, Lance DelaBarre3, Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele3, Kamil Ugurbil3, Ergin Atalar1,2, Yigitcan Eryaman3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, we investigate a strategy to reduce the local specific absorption rate (SAR) while keeping B 1 + constant inside the region of interest (ROI) at the ultra-high field (B0 ≥ 7T) MRI.
METHODS: Locally raising the resonance structure under the discontinuity (i.e., creating a bump) increases the distance between the accumulated charges and the tissue. As a result, it reduces the electric field and local SAR generated by these charges inside the tissue. The B 1 + at a point that is sufficiently far from the coil, however, is not affected by this modification. In this study, three different resonant elements (i.e., loop coil, snake antenna, and fractionated dipole [FD]) are investigated. For experimental validation, a bumped FD is further investigated at 10.5T. After the validation, the transmit performances of eight-channel arrays of each element are compared through electromagnetic (EM) simulations.
RESULTS: Introducing a bump reduced the peak 10g-averaged SAR by 21, 26, 23% for the loop and snake antenna at 7T, and FD at 10.5T, respectively. In addition, eight-channel bumped FD array at 10.5T had a 27% lower peak 10g-averaged SAR in a realistic human body simulation (i.e., prostate imaging) compared to an eight-channel FD array.
CONCLUSION: In this study, we investigated a simple design strategy based on adding bumps to a resonant element to reduce the local SAR while maintaining B 1 + inside an ROI. As an example, we modified an FD and performed EM simulations and phantom experiments with a 10.5T scanner. Results show that the peak 10g-averaged SAR can be reduced more than 25%.
© 2020 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  10.5 Tesla; MRI; bumped transmitter; radiofrequency safety; ultra-high field

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32767392      PMCID: PMC7722062          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  27 in total

1.  Transmit and receive transmission line arrays for 7 Tesla parallel imaging.

Authors:  Gregor Adriany; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Florian Wiesinger; Steen Moeller; John P Strupp; Peter Andersen; Carl Snyder; Xiaoliang Zhang; Wei Chen; Klaas P Pruessmann; Peter Boesiger; Tommy Vaughan; Kāmil Uğurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Observation of the lenticulostriate arteries in the human brain in vivo using 7.0T MR angiography.

Authors:  Zang-Hee Cho; Chang-Ki Kang; Jae-Yong Han; Sang-Hoon Kim; Kyoung-Nam Kim; Suk-Min Hong; Cheol-Wan Park; Young-Bo Kim
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Ultimate intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in MRI.

Authors:  O Ocali; E Atalar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Temperature mapping using the water proton chemical shift: a chemical shift selective phase mapping method.

Authors:  K Kuroda; K Oshio; A H Chung; K Hynynen; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  In vivo visualization of senile-plaque-like pathology in Alzheimer's disease patients by MR microscopy on a 7T system.

Authors:  Tsutomu Nakada; Hitoshi Matsuzawa; Hironaka Igarashi; Yukihiko Fujii; Ingrid L Kwee
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 2.486

6.  7T human spine imaging arrays with adjustable inductive decoupling.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Chunsheng Wang; Roland Krug; Douglas A Kelley; Duan Xu; Yong Pang; Suchandrima Banerjee; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson; Sharmila Majumdar; Xiaoliang Zhang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Nineteen-channel receive array and four-channel transmit array coil for cervical spinal cord imaging at 7T.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Julien Cohen-Adad; Jonathan R Polimeni; Boris Keil; Bastien Guerin; Kawin Setsompop; Peter Serano; Azma Mareyam; Philipp Hoecht; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  A 16-channel combined loop-dipole transceiver array for 7 Tesla body MRI.

Authors:  M Arcan Ertürk; Alexander J E Raaijmakers; Gregor Adriany; Kâmil Uğurbil; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  In vivo human head MRI at 10.5T: A radiofrequency safety study and preliminary imaging results.

Authors:  Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh; Lance DelaBarre; Russell L Lagore; Angel Torrado-Carvajal; Xiaoping Wu; Andrea Grant; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Kamil Ugurbil; Ergin Atalar; Yigitcan Eryaman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  An eight-channel phased array RF coil for spine MR imaging at 7 T.

Authors:  Oliver Kraff; Andreas K Bitz; Stefan Kruszona; Stephan Orzada; Lena C Schaefer; Jens M Theysohn; Stefan Maderwald; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  6 in total

1.  A nine-channel transmit/receive array for spine imaging at 10.5 T: Introduction to a nonuniform dielectric substrate antenna.

Authors:  Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh; Steve Jungst; Mike Lanagan; Lance DelaBarre; Xiaoping Wu; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Kamil Ugurbil; Ergin Atalar; Yigitcan Eryaman
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Bench to bore ramifications of inter-subject head differences on RF shimming and specific absorption rates at 7T.

Authors:  Benjamin M Hardy; Rana Banik; Xinqiang Yan; Adam W Anderson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.130

3.  The Coax Dipole: A fully flexible coaxial cable dipole antenna with flattened current distribution for body imaging at 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Carel C van Leeuwen; Bart R Steensma; Dennis W J Klomp; Cornelis A T van den Berg; Alexander J E Raaijmakers
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.737

Review 4.  Ultra-high-field MR in Prostate cancer: Feasibility and Potential.

Authors:  Carlijn J A Tenbergen; Gregory J Metzger; Tom W J Scheenen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Displacement current distribution on a high dielectric constant helmet and its effect on RF field at 10.5 T (447 MHz).

Authors:  Navid P Gandji; Christopher T Sica; Michael T Lanagan; Myung-Kyun Woo; Lance DelaBarre; Jerahmie Radder; Bei Zhang; Riccardo Lattanzi; Gregor Adriany; Kamil Ugurbil; Qing X Yang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.737

6.  The "Loopole" Antenna: A Hybrid Coil Combining Loop and Electric Dipole Properties for Ultra-High-Field MRI.

Authors:  Karthik Lakshmanan; Martijn Cloos; Ryan Brown; Riccardo Lattanzi; Daniel K Sodickson; Graham C Wiggins
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 1.176

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.