Literature DB >> 6263442

Some results of screening for early lung cancer.

W F Taylor, R S Fontana, M A Uhlenhopp, C S Davis.   

Abstract

Screening for lung cancer is somewhat controversial in that very few evaluations of the screening process have been made, and even fewer have involved the use of concomitant, unscreened controls. This report of the Mayo Lung Project provides evaluation of a randomly selected 4500 clinic patients, offered screening for lung cancer at four-month intervals for six years. Another 4500 randomly selected controls not offered screening were merely observed. Good screening is defined, the Mayo project is evaluated, and puzzling results are presented and discussed. From the screened group, 98 new cases of lung cancer have been detected, 67 by study screening and 31 by spontaneous reporting of symptoms (15) or by x-ray examinations (16) done in other than study circumstances. From the controls, 64 new lung cancer cases have been detected, 43 by symptoms and 1 by other methods. Lung cancer mortality is 39 for study patients and 41 for controls. There is thus no evidence at this time that early case finding hs decreased mortality from lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6263442     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810301)47:5+<1114::aid-cncr2820471309>3.0.co;2-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative approaches to the evaluation of screening programs.

Authors:  N E Day
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Industrial lung cancer.

Authors:  M Fitch
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Recent advances in respiratory medicine.

Authors:  D C Flenley
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Resectability of lung cancer and survival in the New York Lung Cancer Detection Program.

Authors:  H J Flehinger; M R Melamed; M B Zaman; R T Heelan; W Perchick; N Martini
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  Renée Manser; Anne Lethaby; Louis B Irving; Christine Stone; Graham Byrnes; Michael J Abramson; Don Campbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-21

6.  Screening for occult lung cancer.

Authors:  T H Barclay; J H MacIntosh
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  3p22.1 and 10q22.3 deletions detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): a potential new tool for early detection of non-small cell lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Sai Yendamuri; Ara A Vaporciyan; Tanweer Zaidi; Lei Feng; Ricardo Fernandez; Nebiyou B Bekele; Wayne L Hofstetter; Feng Jiang; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Margaret R Spitz; Stephen G Swisher; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth; Ruth L Katz
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  A population-based cohort study of chest x-ray screening in smokers: lung cancer detection findings and follow-up.

Authors:  Lorenzo Dominioni; Nicola Rotolo; William Mantovani; Albino Poli; Salvatore Pisani; Valentina Conti; Massimo Paolucci; Fausto Sessa; Antonio Paddeu; Vincenzo D'Ambrosio; Andrea Imperatori
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Screening for lung cancer.

Authors:  D Carter
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1981 Sep-Oct
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.