Literature DB >> 26578721

A comparison of floral integration between selfing and outcrossing species: a meta-analysis.

Juan Fornoni1, Mariano Ordano2, Rubén Pérez-Ishiwara1, Karina Boege1, César A Domínguez3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Floral integration is thought to be an adaptation to promote cross-fertilization, and it is often assumed that it increases morphological matching between flowers and pollinators, increasing the efficiency of pollen transfer. However, the evidence for this role of floral integration is limited, and recent studies have suggested a possible positive association between floral integration and selfing. Although a number of explanations exist to account for this inconsistency, to date there has been no attempt to examine the existence of an association between floral integration and mating system. This study hypothesized that if pollinator-mediated pollen movement among plants (outcrossing) is the main factor promoting floral integration, species with a predominantly outcrossing mating system should present higher levels of floral integration than those with a predominantly selfing mating system.
METHODS: A phylogenetically informed meta-analysis of published data was performed in order to evaluate whether mating system (outcrossing vs. selfing) accounts for the variation in floral integration among 64 species of flowering plants. Morphometric floral information was used to compare intra-floral integration among traits describing sexual organs (androecium and gynoecium) and those corresponding to the perianth (calix and corolla). KEY
RESULTS: The analysis showed that outcrossing species have lower floral integration than selfing species. This pattern was caused by significantly higher integration of sexual traits than perianth traits, as integration of the latter group remained unchanged across mating categories.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the evolution of selfing is associated with concomitant changes in intra-floral integration. Thus, floral integration of sexual traits should be considered as a critical component of the selfing syndrome.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Floral evolution; intra-floral integration; phenotypic integration; plant mating system; selfing syndrome

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26578721      PMCID: PMC4724042          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcv166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  36 in total

1.  Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.

Authors:  Simon P Blomberg; Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond.

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Genetic constraints on floral evolution: a review and evaluation of patterns.

Authors:  T-L Ashman; C J Majetic
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Ancient polymorphism reveals unidirectional breeding system shifts.

Authors:  Boris Igic; Lynn Bohs; Joshua R Kohn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Phylogenetic analysis of floral integration in Schizanthus (Solanaceae): does pollination truly integrate corolla traits?

Authors:  F Pérez; M T K Arroyo; R Medel
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Phenotypic integration: between zero and how much is too much.

Authors:  Juan Fornoni; Mariano Ordano; Karina Boege; César A Domínguez
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution.

Authors:  Campbell O Webb; David D Ackerly; Steven W Kembel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Covariance of floral and vegetative traits in four species of Ranunculaceae: a comparison between specialized and generalized pollination systems.

Authors:  Jin-Liu Meng; Xian-Hui Zhou; Zhi-Gang Zhao; Guo-Zhen Du
Journal:  J Integr Plant Biol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.061

9.  The adaptive value of phenotypic floral integration.

Authors:  Mariano Ordano; Juan Fornoni; Karina Boege; César A Domínguez
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language.

Authors:  Emmanuel Paradis; Julien Claude; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  8 in total

1.  Detecting canalization and intra-floral modularity in triggerplant (Stylidium) flowers: correlations are only part of the story.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster; Juliet A Wege
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Exploring the ontogenetic scaling hypothesis during the diversification of pollination syndromes in Caiophora (Loasaceae, subfam. Loasoideae).

Authors:  Marina M Strelin; Santiago Benitez-Vieyra; Juan Fornoni; Christian Peter Klingenberg; Andrea A Cocucci
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Genetic and environmental integration of the hawkmoth pollination syndrome in Ruellia humilis (Acanthaceae).

Authors:  John S Heywood; Joseph S Michalski; Braden K McCann; Amber D Russo; Kara J Andres; Allison R Hall; Tessa C Middleton
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Small reductions in corolla size and pollen: ovule ratio, but no changes in flower shape in selfing populations of the North American Arabidopsis lyrata.

Authors:  Samuel Carleial; Mark van Kleunen; Marc Stift
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Evolution of Gene Duplication in Plants.

Authors:  Nicholas Panchy; Melissa Lehti-Shiu; Shin-Han Shiu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Modularity and evolution of flower shape: the role of function, development, and spandrels in Erica.

Authors:  Dieter Reich; Andreas Berger; Maria von Balthazar; Marion Chartier; Mahboubeh Sherafati; Jürg Schönenberger; Sara Manafzadeh; Yannick M Staedler
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 10.151

7.  Modularity increases rate of floral evolution and adaptive success for functionally specialized pollination systems.

Authors:  Agnes S Dellinger; Silvia Artuso; Susanne Pamperl; Fabián A Michelangeli; Darin S Penneys; Diana M Fernández-Fernández; Marcela Alvear; Frank Almeda; W Scott Armbruster; Yannick Staedler; Jürg Schönenberger
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-12-05

8.  Modular regulation of floral traits by a PRE1 homolog in Mimulus verbenaceus: implications for the role of pleiotropy in floral integration.

Authors:  Hongfei Chen; Zheng Xiao; Baoqing Ding; Pamela K Diggle; Yao-Wu Yuan
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.291

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.