Literature DB >> 28334177

Genetic and environmental integration of the hawkmoth pollination syndrome in Ruellia humilis (Acanthaceae).

John S Heywood, Joseph S Michalski, Braden K McCann, Amber D Russo, Kara J Andres, Allison R Hall, Tessa C Middleton.   

Abstract

Background and Aims: The serial homology of floral structures has made it difficult to assess the relative contributions of selection and constraint to floral integration. The interpretation of floral integration may also be clouded by the tacit, but largely untested, assumption that genetic and environmental perturbations affect trait correlations in similar ways. In this study, estimates of both the genetic and environmental correlations between components of the hawkmoth pollination syndrome are presented for chasmogamous flowers of Ruellia humilis , including two levels of control for serial homology.
Methods: A greenhouse population for quantitative genetic analysis was generated by a partial diallel cross between field-collected plants. An average of 634 chasmogamous flowers were measured for each of eight floral traits that contribute to the hawkmoth syndrome. Genetic correlations (across parents) and environmental correlations (across replicate flowers) were estimated by restricted maximum likelihood. Key
Results: Stigma height, anther height and floral tube length were very tightly integrated in their responses to both genetic and environmental perturbations. The inclusion of floral disc width as a control for serial homology suggests this integration is an adaptive response to correlational selection imposed by pollinators. In contrast, integration of non-homologous traits was low. Furthermore, when comparisons between the dimensions of serially homologous structures were excluded, the genetic and environmental correlation matrices showed little congruence. Conclusions: The results suggest that hawkmoths have imposed strong correlational selection on floral traits involved in the deposition and removal of pollen, and that this is a consequence of stabilizing selection on the relative positions of stigmas and anthers in the face of substantial flower size variation. Low integration of other floral traits, and conflicting patterns of genetic and environmental correlations among these traits, suggest weak or no correlational selection within the range of variability expressed within a population.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  Correlational selection; Ruellia humilis; floral integration; flower size variation; genetic correlation; hawkmoth pollination; herkogamy; phenotypic integration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334177      PMCID: PMC5604580          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcx003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  57 in total

1.  The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine Neotropical plants: a re-evaluation of Berg's correlation-pleiades concept.

Authors:  W S Armbruster; V S Di Stilio; J D Tuxill; T C Flores; J L Velásquez Runk
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.844

3.  CAN ONE PREDICT THE EVOLUTION OF QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS WITHOUT GENETICS?

Authors:  John H Willis; Jerry A Coyne; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Decoupled phenotypic variation between floral and vegetative traits: distinguishing between developmental and environmental correlations.

Authors:  Christophe Pélabon; Nora C Osler; Martin Diekmann; Bente J Graae
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  The influence of floral symmetry, dependence on pollinators and pollination generalization on flower size variation.

Authors:  A Lázaro; O Totland
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Are genetic correlations and environmental correlations correlated?

Authors:  J P Hegmann; J C DeFries
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1970-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The genetic correlation between characters maintained by selection, linkage and inbreeding.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Evolution and coexistence of pollination ecotypes in an African Gladiolus (Iridaceae).

Authors:  Bruce Anderson; Ronny Alexandersson; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape.

Authors:  Casper J Breuker; James S Patterson; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Integrated phenotypes: understanding trait covariation in plants and animals.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster; Christophe Pélabon; Geir H Bolstad; Thomas F Hansen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  3 in total

1.  Detecting canalization and intra-floral modularity in triggerplant (Stylidium) flowers: correlations are only part of the story.

Authors:  W Scott Armbruster; Juliet A Wege
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Modularity and evolution of flower shape: the role of function, development, and spandrels in Erica.

Authors:  Dieter Reich; Andreas Berger; Maria von Balthazar; Marion Chartier; Mahboubeh Sherafati; Jürg Schönenberger; Sara Manafzadeh; Yannick M Staedler
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Modular regulation of floral traits by a PRE1 homolog in Mimulus verbenaceus: implications for the role of pleiotropy in floral integration.

Authors:  Hongfei Chen; Zheng Xiao; Baoqing Ding; Pamela K Diggle; Yao-Wu Yuan
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 7.291

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.