Literature DB >> 18061369

Risk perception among women receiving genetic counseling: a population-based follow-up study.

Ellen M Mikkelsen1, Lone Sunde, Christoffer Johansen, Søren P Johnsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to explore the impact of genetic counseling on perceived personal lifetime risk of breast cancer, the accuracy of risk perception, and possible predictors of inaccurate risk perception 1 year following counseling.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based prospective follow-up study of 213 women who received genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, 319 women who underwent mammography (Reference Group I), and a random sample of 1070 women from the general population (Reference Group II).
RESULTS: Women who received genetic counseling decreased their perceived risk by an average of 6.6 percentage points (95% CI: 3.0%; 10.2%) between baseline and 12 months of follow-up. In contrast, perceived risk remained relatively stable in the reference groups. The proportion of women who accurately perceived their risk increased by 16% in the group receiving genetic counseling, compared to a reduction of 5% (p=0.03) and 2% (p=0.01) in Reference Groups I and II, respectively. Risk communicated only in words, inaccurate risk perception at baseline, and presence of a familial mutation appeared to be predictors of inaccurate risk perception 12 months after counseling.
CONCLUSION: This population-based study of women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer indicates that genetic counseling can help them both to reduce their perceived risk and to achieve a more realistic view of their risk of developing breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18061369     DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  6 in total

1.  Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli M Bollinger; Rachel L Dvoskin; Joan A Scott
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  A successful implementation of e-epidemiology: the Danish pregnancy planning study 'Snart-Gravid'.

Authors:  Krista F Huybrechts; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Tina Christensen; Anders H Riis; Elizabeth E Hatch; Lauren A Wise; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Kenneth J Rothman
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Genetic counseling, genetic testing, and risk perceptions for breast and colorectal cancer: Results from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Erin Turbitt; Megan C Roberts; Jennifer M Taber; Erika A Waters; Timothy S McNeel; Barbara B Biesecker; William M P Klein
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Improved health perception after genetic counselling for women at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer: construction of new questionnaires--an Italian exploratory study.

Authors:  Chiara Catania; Irene Feroce; Monica Barile; Aron Goldhirsch; Tommaso De Pas; Filippo de Braud; Sabrina Boselli; Laura Adamoli; Davide Radice; Alessandra Rossi; Gianluca Spitaleri; Cristina Noberasco; Bernardo Bonanni
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Establishing a program for individuals at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Fernando Cadiz; Henry M Kuerer; Julio Puga; Jamile Camacho; Eduardo Cunill; Banu Arun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Risk perception after genetic counseling in patients with increased risk of cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Rantala; Ulla Platten; Gunilla Lindgren; Bo Nilsson; Brita Arver; Annika Lindblom; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.857

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.