Literature DB >> 3872351

Sensitivity to amplitude modulated sounds in the anuran auditory nervous system.

G J Rose, R R Capranica.   

Abstract

Auditory responses were recorded from single units in the eighth nerve and in the midbrain torus semicircularis of the leopard frog (Rana pipiens). Acoustic stimuli included sinusoidally amplitude-modulated (AM) tones and noise, as well as pure tones. Mean spike rates were measured at various rates of AM, and the degree to which a unit's spikes were restricted to a particular phase of the modulation cycle was described by a synchronization coefficient. The firing rate of eighth-nerve fibers was largely independent of the rate of AM over the modulation range 10 to 150 Hz. Further, the general shape of the spike rate vs. AM-rate function was invariant with either depth of modulation or sound-pressure level (SPL). Although virtually all eighth-nerve fibers exhibited significant synchronization to the envelope of AM, the shape of the synchronization function depended on the unit's best-excitatory frequency (BEF). Fibers with highest BEF's, presumed to innervate the basilar papilla, generally showed greater synchronization as the AM rate was increased (up to 100-150 Hz). Fibers tuned to the low-and midfrequency region, which innervate the amphibian papilla, exhibited low-pass synchronization characteristics. As the depth of modulation was reduced, the degree of synchronization of eighth-nerve fibers decreased. For a given depth of modulation an increase in sound level tended to decrease the degree of synchronization, but significant synchronization could still be observed at stimulus intensities at least 65 dB above threshold. On the basis of the spike rate vs. AM-rate functions, the temporal selectivity of single cells in the torus could be characterized by five response types: AM nonselective (spike rate was largely independent of the AM rate); AM high-pass (activity increased as the AM rate was increased); AM low-pass (response was greatest for slow AM rates and decreased at high rates); AM band-suppression (these neurons responded well to low and high AM rates, but responded weakly to intermediate rates); and AM-tuned (spike rate was greatest over a narrow range of modulation rates). In these measurements the depth of modulation was held constant at 100%. The five response categories are not discrete, but rather reflect representative examples along a continuum with regard to temporal selectivity. The temporal selectivity exhibited by toral units in their firing rates was not evident in their AM-synchronization functions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3872351     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1985.53.2.446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  38 in total

1.  Auditory temporal computation: interval selectivity based on post-inhibitory rebound.

Authors:  Edward W Large; John D Crawford
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Coding of amplitude modulation in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pingbo Yin; Jeffrey S Johnson; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Counting on dis-inhibition: a circuit motif for interval counting and selectivity in the anuran auditory system.

Authors:  Richard Naud; Dave Houtman; Gary J Rose; André Longtin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  AM representation in green treefrog auditory nerve fibers: neuroethological implications for pattern recognition and sound localization.

Authors:  G M Klump; J H Benedix; H C Gerhardt; P M Narins
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Stimulus-dependent auditory tuning results in synchronous population coding of vocalizations in the songbird midbrain.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Patrick R Gill; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Female reproductive state influences the auditory midbrain response.

Authors:  Jason A Miranda; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Influence of sound pressure level on the processing of amplitude modulations by auditory neurons of the locust.

Authors:  Gerroth Weschke; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-12-12       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  A neural basis for gyroscopic force measurement in the halteres of Holorusia.

Authors:  J L Fox; T L Daniel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Tone and call responses of units in the auditory nerve and dorsal medullary nucleus of Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Taffeta M Elliott; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Authors:  Ian C Hall; Sarah M N Woolley; Ursula Kwong-Brown; Darcy B Kelley
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.