Literature DB >> 26571157

Impact of Cervical Sagittal Alignment Parameters on Neck Disability.

Sravisht Iyer1, Venu M Nemani, Joseph Nguyen, Jonathan Elysee, Aonnicha Burapachaisri, Christopher P Ames, Han Jo Kim.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVE: Determine if pre-operative cervical alignment serves as an independent predictor of pre-operative disability as measured by the neck disability index (NDI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is growing interest in the relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes. While prior studies have shown that C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correlates with worse NDI scores in post-operative patients, no studies to date have examined the impact of cervical sagittal parameters on pre-operative disability in patients indicated for surgery.
METHODS: Patients with pre-operative standing cervical radiographs, no prior cervical spine procedures and a pre-operative NDI score were identified. Measurements were made by two observers at two different time points. Parameters measured were: Occiput-C2 angle, C1-C2 angle, C2-C7 angle (CL), T1 slope (TS), TS minus CL (TS-CL), C2-C7 SVA, and C1-C7 SVA. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was calculated. Subgroup analyses of myelopathy vs. radiculopathy and deformity vs. no deformity was performed. A multivariate linear regression was performed.
RESULTS: Ninety patients were included. Indications included cervical myelopathy (n = 63), cervical radiculopathy (n = 25), cervical stenosis (n = 9), and others (n = 5). CL averaged -13.7 ± 14.9 degrees. TS averaged 30.7 ± 10.4 degrees and C2-C7 SVA averaged 28.8 ± 13.2  mm. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was good to excellent (ICC > 0.8). Increasing CL (r = 0.277, P = 0.009), increasing TS (r = -0.273, P = 0.011) and increasing TS-CL (r = -0.301, P = 0.005) were correlated with decreasing NDI. CL, TS and TS-CL were also strongly correlated with each other (r > 0.65, P < 0.001 for all bivariate correlations). A multivariate regression adjusting for age and indication showed TS-CL (P = 0.040) and C2-C7 SVA (P = 0.015) were independent predictors of NDI.
CONCLUSION: Increasing CL, increasing TS and increasing TS-CL are correlated with decreasing pre-operative NDI. Low TS-CL and high C2-C7 SVA are independent predictors of high pre-operative NDI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26571157     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  31 in total

1.  Kinematic characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance: a weight-bearing dynamic MRI study.

Authors:  Koji Tamai; Phillip Grisdela; Joshua Romanu; Permsak Paholpak; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Adult cervical deformity: radiographic and osteotomy classifications.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Neil V Shah; Maximillian Solow; Vincent Challier; Carl B Paulino; Peter G Passias; Renaud Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Cut-off values of and factors associated with a negative influence on Neck Disability Index.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Daisuke Togawa; Go Yoshida; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Yu Yamato; Tatsuya Yasuda; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Yuki Mihara; Hiroki Ushirozako; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Juliane Koller; Michael Mayer; Axel Hempfing; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice.

Authors:  Avinash G Patwardhan; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Robert M Havey; Leonard I Voronov; Zachary A Smith; Olivia Kalmanson; Alexander J Ghanayem; William Sears
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Which parameters are relevant in sagittal balance analysis of the cervical spine? A literature review.

Authors:  Fong Poh Ling; T Chevillotte; A Leglise; W Thompson; C Bouthors; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Radiographic Analysis of Cervical and Spinal Alignment in Multilevel ACDF with Lordotic Interbody Device.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Katsuura; Alex Lemons; Eileen Lorenz; Rachel Swafford; James Osborn; Garrick Cason
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-04-05

9.  Characteristics of cervical sagittal parameters in healthy cervical spine adults and patients with cervical disc degeneration.

Authors:  Rong Xing; Wangmi Liu; Xilei Li; Libo Jiang; Mumingjiang Yishakea; Jian Dong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Cervical sagittal alignment after different anterior discectomy procedures for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Roland D Donk; Hisse Arnts; Wim I M Verhagen; Hans Groenewoud; Andre Verbeek; Ronald H M A Bartels
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.