Literature DB >> 29569158

Cut-off values of and factors associated with a negative influence on Neck Disability Index.

Shin Oe1, Daisuke Togawa2, Go Yoshida3, Tomohiko Hasegawa3, Yu Yamato3, Tatsuya Yasuda4, Tomohiro Banno3, Hideyuki Arima3, Yuki Mihara3, Hiroki Ushirozako3, Yukihiro Matsuyama3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is used to evaluate patients with cervical spine disease. However, few reports have defined the cut-off values of the NDI. The purpose of this study was to identify the cut-off values of and factors with a negative impact on NDI.
METHODS: A total of 487 volunteers were divided into three groups based on disability: none, mild, and disabled. The cut-off values of the NDI were determined using receiver-operating characteristic curves. After these groups were divided based on sex and age adjustment was performed, the factors with a negative impact on NDI were investigated using multiple logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: Groups none, mild, and disabled included 207, 186, and 94 volunteers, respectively. The cut-off values of the NDI in each group were 0-5, 6-17, and ≥ 18%, respectively. After adjusting for age, groups none, mild, and disabled had 65, 56, and 23 males, respectively, and 92, 103, and 56 females, respectively. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the factors with a negative impact on NDI in males were manual work (odds ratio [OR] 1.924), higher T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (OR 1.043), and higher C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (OR 1.029, P < 0.05). Among females, the factors were hand-grip strength (OR 0.936), body fat percentage (OR 0.942), and sporting activity (OR 0.456, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Deterioration in NDI was associated with cervical spinal malalignment and manual labor in males and lack of physical activity and sarcopenia in females. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical spinal alignment; Cut-off value; Manual worker; Neck Disability Index; Sarcopenia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29569158     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5555-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  23 in total

1.  Predictive validity of symptoms and signs in the neck and shoulders.

Authors:  E Viikari-Juntura; E Takala; H Riihimäki; R Martikainen; P Jäppinen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature.

Authors:  René Fejer; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik; Jan Hartvigsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Normative score and cut-off value of the Neck Disability Index.

Authors:  So Kato; Katsushi Takeshita; Ko Matsudaira; Juichi Tonosu; Nobuhiro Hara; Hirotaka Chikuda
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 1.601

4.  Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general population.

Authors:  P R Croft; M Lewis; A C Papageorgiou; E Thomas; M I Jayson; G J Macfarlane; A J Silman
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  The Influence of Age and Sex on Cervical Spinal Alignment Among Volunteers Aged Over 50.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Daisuke Togawa; Keiichi Nakai; Tomohiro Yamada; Hideyuki Arima; Tomohiro Banno; Tatsuya Yasuda; Sho Kobayasi; Yu Yamato; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Go Yoshida; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People.

Authors:  Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 10.668

7.  Prevalence and predictors of intense, chronic, and disabling neck and back pain in the UK general population.

Authors:  Roger Webb; Therese Brammah; Mark Lunt; Michelle Urwin; Tim Allison; Deborah Symmons
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The reliability of the Vernon and Mior neck disability index, and its validity compared with the short form-36 health survey questionnaire.

Authors:  M J H McCarthy; M P Grevitt; P Silcocks; G Hobbs
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Chronic neck and shoulder pain, age, and working conditions: longitudinal results from a large random sample in France.

Authors:  B Cassou; F Derriennic; C Monfort; J Norton; A Touranchet
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

Authors:  H Vernon; S Mior
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  1 in total

1.  Spinal Sagittal Alignment, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Scores, and Patient-Reported Outcome among People with Sporting Activity.

Authors:  Shin Oe; Yu Yamato; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Go Yoshida; Sho Kobayashi; Tatsuya Yasuda; Tomohiro Banno; Hideyuki Arima; Yuki Mihara; Hiroki Ushirozako; Tomohiro Yamada; Koichiro Ide; Yuh Watanabe; Haruo Niwa; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-01-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.