Koji Tamai1,2, Phillip Grisdela1, Joshua Romanu1, Permsak Paholpak1, Zorica Buser3, Jeffrey C Wang1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. 2. Department of Orthopedics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. zbuser@usc.edu.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: It is a retrospective analysis of 1806 consecutive cervical magnetic resonance images taken in weight-bearing flexion, neutral, and extension positions. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify the kinematic characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance. Additionally, factors were analysed in the neutral position that could predict the characteristics. Little is known about the kinematic characteristics during cervical flexion and extension positions of the patient with cervical imbalance (cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) in neutral position ≥ 40 mm). METHODS: After evaluating the whole images, cervical imbalance group (cSVA ≥ 40 mm, n = 43) and matched control group (< 40 mm, n = 43) were created using propensity score adjusting for age, gender, and cervical alignment. They were compared for cervical motion, changes in disc bulge, and ligamentum flavum (LF) bulge from flexion to extension. Multinomial logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were calculated to verify the predictive factors and cut-off value of the identified characteristics. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in range of motion and the change in bulged discs. There was significant difference in the presence of LF bulge from flexion to extension (p = 0.023); the incidence of LF bulge increased sharply from neutral to extension in imbalance group, while there was linear increase in control group. The canal diameter (odds ratio = 0.61, p = 0.002) and disc height (odds ratio = 1.60, p = 0.041) showed significant relationship with the segments with LF bulge observed in extension but not in neutral position in the imbalance group; the cut-off values were 10.7 mm for canal diameter (sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 66.7%) and 7.1 mm for disc height (70.8%, 58.5%). CONCLUSION: Patients with cervical imbalance had a stark increase in LF bulge from the neutral to extension position. Canal diameter < 10.7 mm and disc height > 7.1 mm on neutral images may predict the segments with LF bulge observed in extension, but not in the neutral position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II (Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding). These slides can be retrieved from Electronic Supplementary Material.
STUDY DESIGN: It is a retrospective analysis of 1806 consecutive cervical magnetic resonance images taken in weight-bearing flexion, neutral, and extension positions. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify the kinematic characteristics of patients with cervical imbalance. Additionally, factors were analysed in the neutral position that could predict the characteristics. Little is known about the kinematic characteristics during cervical flexion and extension positions of the patient with cervical imbalance (cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) in neutral position ≥ 40 mm). METHODS: After evaluating the whole images, cervical imbalance group (cSVA ≥ 40 mm, n = 43) and matched control group (< 40 mm, n = 43) were created using propensity score adjusting for age, gender, and cervical alignment. They were compared for cervical motion, changes in disc bulge, and ligamentum flavum (LF) bulge from flexion to extension. Multinomial logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were calculated to verify the predictive factors and cut-off value of the identified characteristics. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in range of motion and the change in bulged discs. There was significant difference in the presence of LF bulge from flexion to extension (p = 0.023); the incidence of LF bulge increased sharply from neutral to extension in imbalance group, while there was linear increase in control group. The canal diameter (odds ratio = 0.61, p = 0.002) and disc height (odds ratio = 1.60, p = 0.041) showed significant relationship with the segments with LF bulge observed in extension but not in neutral position in the imbalance group; the cut-off values were 10.7 mm for canal diameter (sensitivity 82.5%, specificity 66.7%) and 7.1 mm for disc height (70.8%, 58.5%). CONCLUSION:Patients with cervical imbalance had a stark increase in LF bulge from the neutral to extension position. Canal diameter < 10.7 mm and disc height > 7.1 mm on neutral images may predict the segments with LF bulge observed in extension, but not in the neutral position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II (Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding). These slides can be retrieved from Electronic Supplementary Material.
Authors: Christopher P Ames; Justin S Smith; Justin K Scheer; Christopher I Shaffrey; Virginie Lafage; Vedat Deviren; Bertrand Moal; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Praveen V Mummaneni; Gregory M Mundis; Richard Hostin; Eric Klineberg; Douglas C Burton; Robert Hart; Shay Bess; Frank J Schwab Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2013-07-05
Authors: Roland D Donk; Michael G Fehlings; Wim I M Verhagen; Hisse Arnts; Hans Groenewoud; André L M Verbeek; Ronald H M A Bartels Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2017-03-03
Authors: Christopher P Ames; Benjamin Blondel; Justin K Scheer; Frank J Schwab; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Eric M Massicotte; Alpesh A Patel; Vincent C Traynelis; Han Jo Kim; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Virginie Lafage Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jessica A Tang; Justin K Scheer; Justin S Smith; Vedat Deviren; Shay Bess; Robert A Hart; Virginie Lafage; Christopher I Shaffrey; Frank Schwab; Christopher P Ames Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 4.654