| Literature DB >> 26568784 |
Kevin C Y Lee1, Xochitl C Morgan2, Jean F Power1, Peter F Dunfield3, Curtis Huttenhower2, Matthew B Stott1.
Abstract
Strain K22(T) is the type species of the recently- described genus Pyrinomonas, in subdivision 4 of the phylum Acidobacteria (Int J Syst Evol Micr. 2014; 64(1):220-7). It was isolated from geothermally-heated soil from Mt. Ngauruhoe, New Zealand, using low-nutrient medium. P. methylaliphatogenes K22(T) has a chemoheterotrophic metabolism; it can hydrolyze a limited range of simple carbohydrates and polypeptides. Its cell membrane is dominated by iso-branching fatty acids, and up to 40 % of its lipid content is membrane-spanning and ether lipids. It is obligately aerobic, thermophilic, moderately acidophilic, and non-spore-forming. The 3,788,560 bp genome of P. methylaliphatogenes K22(T) has a G + C content of 59.36 % and contains 3,189 protein-encoding and 55 non-coding RNA genes. Genomic analysis was consistent with nutritional requirements; in particular, the identified transporter classes reflect the oligotrophic nature of this strain.Entities:
Keywords: Acidobacteria; Geothermal; New Zealand; Pyrinomonas; Soil; Thermophile
Year: 2015 PMID: 26568784 PMCID: PMC4644332 DOI: 10.1186/s40793-015-0099-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stand Genomic Sci ISSN: 1944-3277
Classification and general features of P. methylaliphatogenes K22T
| MIGS ID | Property | Term | Evidence codea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current classification | Domain | TAS [ | |
| Phylum | TAS [ | ||
| Class ‘Insertae sedis 99’ | |||
| Order ‘Insertae sedis 100’ | |||
| Family ‘Insertae sedis 101’ | |||
| Genus | TAS [ | ||
| Species | TAS [ | ||
| Type strain K22T (=DSM 25857T =ICMP 18710T). | TAS [ | ||
| Gram stain | negative | TAS [ | |
| Cell shape | rod | TAS [ | |
| Motility | non-motile | TAS [ | |
| Sporulation | non-sporulating | TAS [ | |
| Temperature range | thermophilic (50–69 °C) | TAS [ | |
| Optimum temperature | 65 °C | TAS [ | |
| pH range | moderately acidophilic (4.1–7.8) | ||
| Optimum pH | 6.5 | ||
| Carbon source | peptides, proteins, carbohydrates | TAS [ | |
| Terminal electron receptor | oxygen | TAS [ | |
| Energy metabolism | chemoorganotroph | TAS [ | |
| MIGS-6 | Habitat | geothermal soil | TAS [ |
| MIGS-6.3 | Salinity | non-halophile (no growth > 1 % (w/v) NaCl) | TAS [ |
| MIGS-22 | Oxygen requirement | obligate aerobe | TAS [ |
| MIGS-15 | Biotic relationship | free-living | TAS [ |
| MIGS-14 | Pathogenicity | not reported | NAS |
| MIGS-4 | Geographic location | Mt Ngauruhoe, New Zealand | TAS [ |
| MIGS-5 | Sample collection | 2006 | NAS |
| MIGS-4.1 MIGS-4.2 | Latitude – Longitude | 39° 9’25.31”S - 175° 38’6.74”E | IDA |
| MIGS-4.3 | Depth | not reported | IDA |
| MIGS-4.4 | Altitude | 2,270 m | IDA |
aEvidence codes - IDA inferred from direct assay, TAS traceable author statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature), NAS non-traceable author statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [38]
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of Pyrinomonas methylaliphatogenes K22T (highlighted) and other cultivated strains and clonal phylotypes within the phylum Acidobacteria. Four of the acidobacterial subdivisions are included. The tree was constructed via a Bayesian inference model (MrBayes), using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC - 2,000,000 resamples, four chains, temperature = 0.5) sampling methods to calculate posterior distributions of trees in the ARB software environment. Posterior probability values ≥ 90 % are indicated by open circles, ≥80 % by filled circles, and ≥70 % by open diamonds. The scale bar represents a 0.1 change per nucleotide position. Strains whose genomes have been sequenced, are marked with an asterisk; G. fermentans H5T (NZ_AUAU00000000), H. foetida TMBS4T (AGSB00000000), C. thermophilum BT (CP002414), P. methylaliphatogenes K22T (CBXV000000000), Candidatus ‘S. usitatus’ Ellin6076 (CP000473), Candidatus ‘K. versatilis’ Ellin345 (CP000360), Acidobacterium capsulatum ATCC 51196T (CP001472), Edaphobacter aggregans Wbg-1T (JQKI00000000), Granulicella mallensis MP5ACTX9T (CP003130), Granulicella tundricola MP5ACTX9T (CP002480), Terriglobus roseus KBS63T (CP003379), and Terriglobus saanensis SP1PR4T (CP002467). The phylotypes strains used as an outgroup included Thermoanaerobaculum aquaticum MP-01T (JX4200244), Dictyoglomus thermophilum H-6-12T (X69194), Caldisericum exile AZM16c01T (AB428365), Hydrogenobacter hydrogenophilus Z-829T (Z30424), Thermodesulfobacterium thermophilum DSM 1276T (AF334601), Deinococcus roseus TDMA-uv51 (AB264136), Truepera radiovicrix RQ-24T (DQ022076), Thermus aquaticus YT-1 (L09663), and Thermus scotoductus SE-1T (AF032127)
Fig. 2Transmission electron micrograph of P. methylaliphatogenes K22T cultured in R2A liquid medium (60 °C), using a Zeiss LEO 912 Energy-Filtering TEM [34]. The scale bar represents 500 nm
Project information
| MIGS ID | Property | Term |
|---|---|---|
| MIGS-31 | Finishing quality | High quality draft |
| MIGS-28 | Libraries used | Two libraries used: One 454 library, one Illumina PE library |
| MIGS-29 | Sequencing platforms | 454 GS Junior Titanium, Illumina MiSeq |
| MIGS-31.2 | Fold coverage | 75.0 × |
| MIGS-30 | Assemblers | MIRA 4.0rc2 |
| MIGS-32 | Gene calling method | Prodigal |
| Locus tag | PYK22 | |
| EMBL ID | CBXV000000000 | |
| EMBL Date of Release | 12 January 2015 | |
| GOLD ID | Gp0050834 | |
| BIOPROJECT | PRJEB4906 | |
| MIGS-13 | Source Material Identifier | DSMZ |
| Project relevance | Microbial diversity of the Taupō Volcanic Zone, Tree of Life |
Genome statistics
| Attribute | Genome (total) | |
|---|---|---|
| Value | % of totala | |
| Size (bp) | 3,788,560 | 100.0 |
| DNA coding (bp) | 3,353,298 | 88.5 |
| G + C content (bp) | 2,249,198 | 59.36 |
| DNA Scaffolds | 16 | |
| Total genesb | 3,244 | 100.00 |
| Protein-coding genes | 3,189 | 98.3 |
| RNA genes | 55 | 1.7 |
| Pseudo genes | 0 | 0.0 |
| Genes in paralog clusters | 2535 | 78.4 |
| Protein coding genes with function prediction | 2,564 | 79.0 |
| Genes assigned to COGs | 2,023 | 62.3 |
| Genes assigned Pfam domain | 2,605 | 80.3 |
| Genes with signal peptides | 293 | 9.0 |
| Genes with transmembrane helices | 766 | 23.7 |
| CRISPR repeats | 15 | |
aThe percentage total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome
Number of genes associated with the general COG functional categories
| Code | Value | % of totala | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| J | 137 | 5.01 | Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis |
| A | 1 | 0.03 | RNA processing and modification |
| K | 103 | 3.23 | Transcription |
| L | 77 | 2.41 | Replication, recombination and repair |
| B | 2 | 0.06 | Chromatin structure and dynamics |
| D | 27 | 0.85 | Cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning |
| V | 65 | 2.04 | Defense mechanisms |
| T | 101 | 3.17 | Signal transduction mechanisms |
| M | 191 | 5.99 | Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis |
| N | 67 | 2.10 | Cell motility |
| U | 32 | 1.00 | Intracellular trafficking and secretion |
| O | 123 | 3.85 | Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones |
| C | 127 | 3.98 | Energy production and conversion |
| G | 171 | 5.36 | Carbohydrate transport and metabolism |
| E | 202 | 6.33 | Amino acid transport and metabolism |
| F | 65 | 2.04 | Nucleotide transport and metabolism |
| H | 126 | 3.95 | Coenzyme transport and metabolism |
| I | 105 | 3.29 | Lipid transport and metabolism |
| P | 105 | 3.29 | Inorganic ion transport and metabolism |
| Q | 64 | 2.01 | Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism |
| R | 218 | 6.83 | General function prediction only |
| S | 85 | 2.66 | Function unknown |
| - | 1,223 | 38.33 | Not in COGs |
aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes (3180) in the annotated genome
Fig. 3Graphical map of the genome of P. methylaliphatogenes K22T showing the eight largest scaffolds. From bottom to the top of each scaffold: Genes on forward strand (color by COG categories as denoted by the IMG platform), genes on the reverse strand (color by COG categories), RNA genes (tRNAs – green, sRNAs – red, other RNAs – black), GC content, and GC skew