Literature DB >> 21698410

HER2 discordance between primary breast cancer and its paired metastasis: tumor biology or test artefact? Insights through meta-analysis.

Nehmat Houssami1, Petra Macaskill, Rosemary L Balleine, Michael Bilous, Mark D Pegram.   

Abstract

The proto-oncogene, HER2, has prognostic and predictive relevance in invasive breast cancer (IBC). HER2 testing of primary IBC guides treatment selection and is assumed to reflect HER2 status of associated metastases, although HER2 discordance between IBC and metastasis has been reported. Systematic review and meta-analysis of HER2 status in IBC and its paired loco-regional or distant metastasis were done. Quality appraisal considered whether (within-subject) testing conditions were maintained for paired primary and metastasis. Random effects logistic regression models were used to estimate pooled within-subject HER2 discordant proportions and to examine study-level covariates, including tumor-related and testing-related variables, potentially associated with HER2 discordance differences across (between) studies. Modelled paired HER2 data for primary and metastatic cancer (2520 subjects, 26 studies) showed a pooled HER2 discordance of 5.5% (3.6-8.5%). Sensitivity analysis, excluding the only study not maintaining same conditions for paired testing, gave a pooled estimate of 5.2% (3.5-7.8%). Pooled discordant proportion was not associated with differences between studies in test type, test scoring or interpretation criteria, subjects' median age, study time-frame, or HER2 positivity in primary cancer (all P > 0.05). However, type of metastasis was significantly associated with estimated HER2 discordance (P = 0.0017): studies of primary tumor paired with distant metastases had higher discordance [11.5% (6.9-18.6%)] than studies of primary paired with lymph node metastases only [4.1% (2.4-7.2%)], or those paired with nodal or various metastases [3.3% (2.0-5.6%)]; P < 0.01. HER2 discordant proportion was higher where paired metastases were metachronous relative to synchronous to primary IBC (P = 0.0024). Sensitivity analysis provided weak evidence (P = 0.074) that discordance in the direction of change from HER2-negative primary cancer to HER2-positive paired metastasis was more likely than the reverse. Study-level meta-analysis suggests factors associated with the type of metastasis as underlying mechanisms for observed HER2 discordance between primary IBC and paired metastasis. Test-related factors did not account for differences across studies in the HER2 discordant proportion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21698410     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1632-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  46 in total

1.  Bone metastasis: evaluation of 1100 patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Koray Başdelioğlu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2021-03-01

2.  Maintenance treatment of trastuzumab for patients with advanced breast cancer to achieve long term survival: two case reports and literature review.

Authors:  Min Yan; Hui-Min Lv; Meng-Wei Zhang; Shu-De Cui
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 3.  Clinical application of circulating tumor DNA in breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey Chun Hin Chan; James Chung Hang Chow; Connie Hoi Man Ho; Therese Yue Man Tsui; William C Cho
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Biological resonance for cancer metastasis, a new hypothesis based on comparisons between primary cancers and metastases.

Authors:  Dongwei Gao; Sha Li
Journal:  Cancer Microenviron       Date:  2013-11-10

5.  Tendencies for higher co-expression of EGFR and HER2 and downregulation of HER3 in prostate cancer lymph node metastases compared with corresponding primary tumors.

Authors:  J Carlsson; L Shen; J Xiang; J Xu; Q Wei
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  HER2 drives luminal breast cancer stem cells in the absence of HER2 amplification: implications for efficacy of adjuvant trastuzumab.

Authors:  Suthinee Ithimakin; Kathleen C Day; Fayaz Malik; Qin Zen; Scott J Dawsey; Tom F Bersano-Begey; Ahmed A Quraishi; Kathleen Woods Ignatoski; Stephanie Daignault; April Davis; Christopher L Hall; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Amber N Heath; Nader Tawakkol; Tahra K Luther; Shawn G Clouthier; Whitney A Chadwick; Mark L Day; Celina G Kleer; Dafydd G Thomas; Daniel F Hayes; Hasan Korkaya; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Good manufacturing practice production of [(68)Ga]Ga-ABY-025 for HER2 specific breast cancer imaging.

Authors:  Irina Velikyan; Anders Wennborg; Joachim Feldwisch; Henrik Lindman; Jörgen Carlsson; Jens Sörensen
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-04-24

8.  Analysis of ESR1 mutation in circulating tumor DNA demonstrates evolution during therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Gaia Schiavon; Sarah Hrebien; Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Rosalind J Cutts; Alex Pearson; Noelia Tarazona; Kerry Fenwick; Iwanka Kozarewa; Elena Lopez-Knowles; Ricardo Ribas; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Peter Osin; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Lesley-Ann Martin; Mitch Dowsett; Ian E Smith; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 9.  Latest biopsy approach for suspected metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Niikura; Bruno C Odisio; Yutaka Tokuda; Fraser W Symmans; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  Concordance of the HER2 protein and gene status between primary and corresponding lymph node metastatic sites of extramammary Paget disease.

Authors:  Ryota Tanaka; Yuko Sasajima; Hitoshi Tsuda; Kenjiro Namikawa; Akira Takahashi; Arata Tsutsumida; Yasuhiro Fujisawa; Manabu Fujimoto; Naoya Yamazaki
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 5.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.