Daren K Heyland1, Roy Ilan2, Xuran Jiang3, John J You4, Peter Dodek5. 1. Departments of Critical Care Medicine and Public Health Science, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 3. Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 4. Departments of Medicine, and Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 5. Division of Critical Care Medicine and Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the hospital setting, inadequate engagement between healthcare professionals and seriously ill patients and their families regarding end-of-life decisions is common. This problem may lead to medical orders for life-sustaining treatments that are inconsistent with patient preferences. The prevalence of this patient safety problem has not been previously described. METHODS: Using data from a multi-institutional audit, we quantified the mismatch between patients' and family members' expressed preferences for care and orders for life-sustaining treatments. We recruited seriously ill, elderly medical patients and/or their family members to participate in this audit. We considered it a medical error if a patient preferred not to be resuscitated and there were orders to undergo resuscitation (overtreatment), or if a patient preferred resuscitation (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR) and there were orders not to be resuscitated (undertreatment). RESULTS: From 16 hospitals in Canada, 808 patients and 631 family members were included in this study. When comparing expressed preferences and documented orders for use of CPR, 37% of patients experienced a medical error. Very few patients (8, 2%) expressed a preference for CPR and had CPR withheld in their documented medical orders (Undertreatment). Of patients who preferred not to have CPR, 174 (35%) had orders to receive it (Overtreatment). There was considerable variability in overtreatment rates across sites (range: 14-82%). Patients who were frail were less likely to be overtreated; patients who did not have a participating family member were more likely to be overtreated. CONCLUSIONS: Medical errors related to the use of life-sustaining treatments are very common in internal medicine wards. Many patients are at risk of receiving inappropriate end-of-life care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
BACKGROUND: In the hospital setting, inadequate engagement between healthcare professionals and seriously ill patients and their families regarding end-of-life decisions is common. This problem may lead to medical orders for life-sustaining treatments that are inconsistent with patient preferences. The prevalence of this patient safety problem has not been previously described. METHODS: Using data from a multi-institutional audit, we quantified the mismatch between patients' and family members' expressed preferences for care and orders for life-sustaining treatments. We recruited seriously ill, elderly medical patients and/or their family members to participate in this audit. We considered it a medical error if a patient preferred not to be resuscitated and there were orders to undergo resuscitation (overtreatment), or if a patient preferred resuscitation (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR) and there were orders not to be resuscitated (undertreatment). RESULTS: From 16 hospitals in Canada, 808 patients and 631 family members were included in this study. When comparing expressed preferences and documented orders for use of CPR, 37% of patients experienced a medical error. Very few patients (8, 2%) expressed a preference for CPR and had CPR withheld in their documented medical orders (Undertreatment). Of patients who preferred not to have CPR, 174 (35%) had orders to receive it (Overtreatment). There was considerable variability in overtreatment rates across sites (range: 14-82%). Patients who were frail were less likely to be overtreated; patients who did not have a participating family member were more likely to be overtreated. CONCLUSIONS: Medical errors related to the use of life-sustaining treatments are very common in internal medicine wards. Many patients are at risk of receiving inappropriate end-of-life care. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/
Entities:
Keywords:
Adverse events, epidemiology and detection; Chronic disease management; Communication; Decision making; Medical error, measurement/epidemiology
Authors: Michael K Y Wong; Maria Cassandre Medor; Katerina Yelle Labre; Mengzhu Jiang; Jason R Frank; Lisa M Fischer; Warren J Cheung Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2019-09-16
Authors: Andrew Lagrotteria; Marilyn Swinton; Jessica Simon; Seema King; Gwenn Boryski; Irene Wai Yan Ma; Fiona Dunne; Japteg Singh; Rachelle E Bernacki; John J You Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-08-02
Authors: Alexandria J Robbins; Nicholas E Ingraham; Adam C Sheka; Kathryn M Pendleton; Rachel Morris; Alexander Rix; Victor Vakayil; Jeffrey G Chipman; Anthony Charles; Christopher J Tignanelli Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-09-17 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Daniel Kobewka; Daren K Heyland; Peter Dodek; Aman Nijjar; Nick Bansback; Michelle Howard; Peter Munene; Elizabeth Kunkel; Alan Forster; Jamie Brehaut; John J You Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 6.473