Literature DB >> 32949762

Discordant Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Code Status at Death.

Alexandria J Robbins1, Nicholas E Ingraham2, Adam C Sheka3, Kathryn M Pendleton2, Rachel Morris4, Alexander Rix5, Victor Vakayil3, Jeffrey G Chipman6, Anthony Charles7, Christopher J Tignanelli8.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: One fundamental way to honor patient autonomy is to establish and enact their wishes for end-of-life care. Limited research exists regarding adherence with code status.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempts discordant with documented code status at the time of death in the U.S. and to elucidate potential contributing factors.
METHODS: The Cerner Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) outcomes database, which includes 237 U.S. hospitals that collect manually abstracted data from all critical care patients, was queried for adults admitted to intensive care units with a documented code status at the time of death from January 2008 to December 2016. The primary outcome was discordant CPR at death. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify patient-level and hospital-level associated factors after adjustment for age, hospital, and illness severity (APACHE III score).
RESULTS: A total of 21,537 patients from 56 hospitals were included. Of patients with a do-not-resuscitate code status, 149 (0.8%) received CPR at death, and associated factors included black race, higher APACHE III score, or treatment in small or nonteaching hospitals. Of patients with a full code status, 203 (9.0%) did not receive CPR at death, and associated factors included higher APACHE III score, primary neurologic or trauma diagnosis, or admission in a more recent year.
CONCLUSION: At the time of death, 1.6% of patients received or did not undergo CPR in a manner discordant with their documented code statuses. Race and institutional factors were associated with discordant resuscitation, and addressing these disparities may promote concordant end-of-life care in all patients.
Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Code status; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; discordant care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32949762      PMCID: PMC8052631          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  52 in total

1.  Moral distress of staff nurses in a medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Ellen H Elpern; Barbara Covert; Ruth Kleinpell
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  The Importance of Showing Our Work: Process Transparency in Dispute Resolution.

Authors:  Gabriel T Bosslet; Joanna L Hart; Alison E Turnbull
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2019-06

3.  Unilateral Do Not Resuscitate Orders: Physician Attitudes and Practices.

Authors:  Michael S Putman; Andrew D'Alessandro; Farr A Curlin; John D Yoon
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Incidence of treated cardiac arrest in hospitalized patients in the United States.

Authors:  Raina M Merchant; Lin Yang; Lance B Becker; Robert A Berg; Vinay Nadkarni; Graham Nichol; Brendan G Carr; Nandita Mitra; Steven M Bradley; Benjamin S Abella; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Moral Distress Amongst American Physician Trainees Regarding Futile Treatments at the End of Life: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Dzeng; Alessandra Colaianni; Martin Roland; David Levine; Michael P Kelly; Stephen Barclay; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The influence of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on end-of-life care in the ICU.

Authors:  Sarah Muni; Ruth A Engelberg; Patsy D Treece; Danae Dotolo; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Advance Directives and End-of-Life Care among Nursing Home Residents Receiving Maintenance Dialysis.

Authors:  Manjula Kurella Tamura; Maria E Montez-Rath; Yoshio N Hall; Ronit Katz; Ann M O'Hare
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences.

Authors:  Jennifer W Mack; Jane C Weeks; Alexi A Wright; Susan D Block; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The association between treatment preferences and trajectories of care at the end-of-life.

Authors:  JoAnne Alissi Cosgriff; Margaret Pisani; Elizabeth H Bradley; John R O'Leary; Terri R Fried
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Trends in survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Saket Girotra; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; John A Spertus; Yan Li; Harlan M Krumholz; Paul S Chan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.