Literature DB >> 31530581

Gaps in public preparedness to be a substitute decision-maker and the acceptability of high school education on resuscitation and end-of-life care: a mixed-methods study.

Michael K Y Wong1, Maria Cassandre Medor2, Katerina Yelle Labre2, Mengzhu Jiang2, Jason R Frank2, Lisa M Fischer2, Warren J Cheung2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When a patient is incapable of making medical decisions for him- or herself, a substitute decision-maker makes choices according to the patient's previously expressed wishes, values and beliefs; however, little is known about public readiness to act as a substitute decision-maker in Canada. Our primary objective was to measure public self-reported preparedness to act as a substitute decision-maker, and explore the attitudes, barriers and enablers associated with preparedness.
METHODS: From November 2017 to June 2018, we conducted a mixed-methods street intercept survey at 12 pedestrian areas in Ottawa, Ontario. We used descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis to assess predictors of perceived preparedness to be a substitute decision-maker and determine support for high school education. We analyzed qualitative interview questions using inductive thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 626 eligible respondents, 196 refused to participate, leaving 430 participants (response rate 68.7%). A total of 404 surveys (94.0%) were fully complete with no missing data. The respondents were mostly female (243 [56.5%]) and residents of Ontario (364 [84.6%]). The average age was 33.9 years. Although 314 respondents (73.0%) felt prepared to be a substitute decision-maker, 194 (45.1%) reported never having had meaningful conversations with loved ones to understand their wishes in the event of critical illness. A total of 293 participants (68.1%) identified important barriers to feeling prepared. Most respondents (309 [71.9%]) agreed that high school students should learn about being a substitute decision-maker, citing age appropriateness, potential societal benefit and improved decision-making, while cautioning the need to respect different maturity levels, cultures and experiences.
INTERPRETATION: he lack of conversation between loved ones reveals a gap between perceived and actual preparedness to be a substitute decision-maker for a loved one with a critical illness. The overall acceptability of high school education warrants further exploration. Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31530581      PMCID: PMC6759018          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20190037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  21 in total

1.  The Ligurian high-school educational project on palliative care: development and piloting of a school-based intervention on bereavement and severe illness.

Authors:  Monica Beccaro; Giorgia Gollo; Monica Giordano; Jessica Igazzini; Valentina Servente; Stefano Vignali; Massimo Costantini; Silvia Di Leo
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Engagement in Advance Care Planning and Surrogates' Knowledge of Patients' Treatment Goals.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Maria Zenoni; Lynne Iannone; John O'Leary; Brenda T Fenton
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members.

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Peter Dodek; Graeme Rocker; Dianne Groll; Amiram Gafni; Deb Pichora; Sam Shortt; Joan Tranmer; Neil Lazar; Jim Kutsogiannis; Miu Lam
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning.

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Doris Barwich; Deb Pichora; Peter Dodek; Francois Lamontagne; John J You; Carolyn Tayler; Pat Porterfield; Tasnim Sinuff; Jessica Simon
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Barriers to Goals of Care Discussions With Patients Who Have Advanced Heart Failure: Results of a Multicenter Survey of Hospital-Based Cardiology Clinicians.

Authors:  John J You; Natasha Aleksova; Anique Ducharme; Jane MacIver; Lisa Mielniczuk; Robert A Fowler; Catherine Demers; Brian Clarke; Marie-Claude Parent; Mustafa Toma; Patricia H Strachan; Paul Farand; Debra Isaac; Shelley Zieroth; Marilyn Swinton; Xuran Jiang; Andrew G Day; Daren K Heyland; Heather J Ross
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 5.712

6.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: knowledge and opinions among the U.S. general public. State of the science-fiction.

Authors:  Catherine A Marco; Gregory L Larkin
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Barriers to goals of care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families: a multicenter survey of clinicians.

Authors:  John J You; James Downar; Robert A Fowler; François Lamontagne; Irene W Y Ma; Dev Jayaraman; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Patricia H Strachan; Roy Ilan; Aman P Nijjar; John Neary; John Shik; Kevin Brazil; Amen Patel; Kim Wiebe; Martin Albert; Anita Palepu; Elysée Nouvet; Amanda Roze des Ordons; Nishan Sharma; Amane Abdul-Razzak; Xuran Jiang; Andrew Day; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Why do I need it? I am not at risk! Public perceptions towards the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccine.

Authors:  Holly Seale; Anita E Heywood; Mary-Louise McLaws; Kirsten F Ward; Chris P Lowbridge; Debbie Van; C Raina MacIntyre
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  The prevalence of medical error related to end-of-life communication in Canadian hospitals: results of a multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Daren K Heyland; Roy Ilan; Xuran Jiang; John J You; Peter Dodek
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  What do Canadians think of advanced care planning? Findings from an online opinion poll.

Authors:  Ana A Teixeira; Louise Hanvey; Carolyn Tayler; Doris Barwich; Sharon Baxter; Daren K Heyland
Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.