Literature DB >> 26547292

Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the United States.

Rohan Khera1, Peter Cram2, Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin3, Phillip A Horwitz4, Saket Girotra5.   

Abstract

Percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVADs) and intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) are used to provide mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Contemporary trends in their utilization and impact on in-hospital mortality are not known. Using the National Inpatient Sample (2004 to 2012), we identified 5,031 patients who received a PVAD and 122,333 who received an IABP on the same day as PCI using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition codes. Utilization of MCS increased from 1.3% of all PCIs in 2004 to 3.4% in 2012 (p trend <0.001), with increase in the use of both PVAD (<1/10,000 PCIs [2004 to 2007] to 38/10,000 [2012]) and IABP (132/10,000 PCIs [2004] to 299/10,000[2012] p <0.0001 for both). PVAD recipients were older (69 vs 65 years), more likely to have heart failure (68% vs 41%), chronic kidney disease (27% vs 11%, p <0.001 for all), and be admitted electively (30% vs 11%), but less likely to have acute myocardial infarction (52% vs 90%), cardiogenic shock (23% vs 50%), or need mechanical ventilation (16% vs 29%) compared with IABP recipients. Unadjusted in-hospital mortality was lower in PVAD compared with IABP recipients (12.8% vs 20.9%, p <0.001). However, in propensity-matched analyses (1:2), in-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.09). In conclusion, there has been a marked increase in the utilization of MCS in patients undergoing PCI. Unadjusted mortality using PVADs is lower than IABP but may be due to their selective use in patients at lower risk. Randomized trials are necessary to establish their effectiveness in supporting high-risk PCI.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26547292      PMCID: PMC4690753          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  19 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Karl Werdan; Stephan Gielen; Henning Ebelt; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Defending substantial equivalence: an argument for the continuing validity of the 510(k) premarket notification process.

Authors:  James M Flaherty
Journal:  Food Drug Law J       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.619

3.  2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention.

Authors:  Charanjit S Rihal; Srihari S Naidu; Michael M Givertz; Wilson Y Szeto; James A Burke; Navin K Kapur; Morton Kern; Kirk N Garratt; James A Goldstein; Vivian Dimas; Thomas Tu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Clinical and economic effectiveness of percutaneous ventricular assist devices for high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Atman P Shah; Elizabeth M Retzer; Sandeep Nathan; Jonathan D Paul; Janet Friant; Karin E Dill; Joseph L Thomas
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.022

5.  Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Uwe Zeymer; Franz-Josef Neumann; Miroslaw Ferenc; Hans-Georg Olbrich; Jörg Hausleiter; Antoinette de Waha; Gert Richardt; Marcus Hennersdorf; Klaus Empen; Georg Fuernau; Steffen Desch; Ingo Eitel; Rainer Hambrecht; Bernward Lauer; Michael Böhm; Henning Ebelt; Steffen Schneider; Karl Werdan; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Trends in the use of percutaneous ventricular assist devices: analysis of national inpatient sample data, 2007 through 2012.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Ankur Vyas; Alicia Gerke; Gary E Rosenthal; Phillip A Horwitz; Saket Girotra
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Impact of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump on prognostically important clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (from the PROTECT II randomized trial).

Authors:  George D Dangas; Annapoorna S Kini; Samin K Sharma; Jose P S Henriques; Bimmer E Claessen; Simon R Dixon; Joseph M Massaro; Igor Palacios; Jeffrey J Popma; Magnus Ohman; Gregg W Stone; William W O'Neill
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  A prospective feasibility trial investigating the use of the Impella 2.5 system in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (The PROTECT I Trial): initial U.S. experience.

Authors:  Simon R Dixon; José P S Henriques; Laura Mauri; Krischan Sjauw; Andrew Civitello; Biswajit Kar; Pranav Loyalka; Frederic S Resnic; Paul Teirstein; Raj Makkar; Igor F Palacios; Michael Collins; Jeffrey Moses; Karim Benali; William W O'Neill
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Melchior Seyfarth; Dirk Sibbing; Iris Bauer; Georg Fröhlich; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Robert Byrne; Josef Dirschinger; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yousif Ahmad; Sayan Sen; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Jing Ouyang; Judith A Finegold; Rasha K Al-Lamee; Justin E R Davies; Graham D Cole; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  9 in total

1.  Positive esophageal proximal resection margin: an important prognostic factor for esophageal cancer that warrants adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Yun-Cang Wang; Han-Yu Deng; Wen-Ping Wang; Du He; Peng-Zhi Ni; Wei-Peng Hu; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Oleh A Loskutov; Olexandr M Druzhyna; Dmytro O Dziuba; Stepan R Maruniak; Dmytro O Loskutov; Sergii F Veremchuk; Havryil I Kovtun; Borys M Todurov
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2020-09

3.  Etiologies and predictors of 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing percutaneous mechanical circulatory support-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

Authors:  Chirag Bavishi; Alejandro Lemor; Vrinda Trivedi; Saurav Chatterjee; Pedro Moreno; John Lasala; Herbert D Aronow; J Dawn Abbott
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Use in Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2000 to 2014.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Gurpreet S Sandhu; Mackram F Eleid; Shannon M Dunlay; Gregory J Schears; John M Stulak; Mandeep Singh; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 8.790

5.  Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Before Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Shilpkumar Arora; Sopan Lahewala; Varun Kumar; Ghanshyam P S Shantha; Jacob C Jentzer; John M Stulak; Bernard J Gersh; Rajiv Gulati; Charanjit S Rihal; Abhiram Prasad; Abhishek J Deshmukh
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Infectious complications of endoarterial interventional radiology: protocol for an observational study of a longitudinal national cohort of patients assessed in the French hospital discharge database (MOEVA study).

Authors:  Kaoutar Aid Mellouk; Abdelmajid Soulaymani; Fei Gao; Pascal Astagneau; Benoit Misset
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Comparative safety of percutaneous ventricular assist device and intra-aortic balloon pump in acute myocardial infarction-induced cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Waqas Ullah; Mohamed Zghouzi; Maryam Mukhtar; Ali Banisad; Gaith Alhatemi; Yasar Sattar; Salman Zahid; Homam Moussa Pacha; Delair Gardi; M Chadi Alraies
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-06

8.  Revascularization Practices and Outcomes in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Who Presented With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock in the US, 2009-2018.

Authors:  Rohan Khera; Eric A Secemsky; Yongfei Wang; Nihar R Desai; Harlan M Krumholz; Thomas M Maddox; Kendrick A Shunk; Salim S Virani; Deepak L Bhatt; Jeptha Curtis; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 44.409

9.  Pulmonary artery catheter use in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Aditi Shankar; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Jacob C Jentzer; Shilpkumar Arora; Saarwaani Vallabhajosyula; Bernard J Gersh; Allan S Jaffe; David R Holmes; Shannon M Dunlay; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-04-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.