Literature DB >> 25861963

2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: Endorsed by the American Heart Assocation, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion; Affirmation of Value by the Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology-Association Canadienne de Cardiologie d'intervention.

Charanjit S Rihal1, Srihari S Naidu2, Michael M Givertz3, Wilson Y Szeto4, James A Burke5, Navin K Kapur6, Morton Kern7, Kirk N Garratt8, James A Goldstein9, Vivian Dimas10, Thomas Tu11.   

Abstract

Although historically the intra-aortic balloon pump has been the only mechanical circulatory support device available to clinicians, a number of new devices have become commercially available and have entered clinical practice. These include axial flow pumps, such as Impella(®); left atrial to femoral artery bypass pumps, specifically the TandemHeart; and new devices for institution of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. These devices differ significantly in their hemodynamic effects, insertion, monitoring, and clinical applicability. This document reviews the physiologic impact on the circulation of these devices and their use in specific clinical situations. These situations include patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, those presenting with cardiogenic shock, and acute decompensated heart failure. Specialized uses for right-sided support and in pediatric populations are discussed and the clinical utility of mechanical circulatory support devices is reviewed, as are the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines.
Copyright © 2015 The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, The American College of Cardiology Foundation, The Heart Failure Society of America, and The Society for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACC Expert Consensus Document; cardiogenic; percutaneous coronary intervention; shock; ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25861963     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  92 in total

Review 1.  Options for temporary mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Areo Saffarzadeh; Pramod Bonde
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Prime Time for Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support.

Authors:  Peter M Eckman; Katarzyna Hryniewicz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  BiPella: Mini Review on a Novel Method to Treat Cardiogenic Shock Patients.

Authors:  Doruk C Karaaslan; Deniz Mutlu; Vasili Lendel; Ismail Ates; Sibel Kulaksizoglu; Mehmet Cilingiroglu
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 2.672

4.  [Cardiogenic shock].

Authors:  J Bauersachs; A Schäfer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 5.  [Coronary artery disease : Interventional and operative therapeutic options after cardiac arrest].

Authors:  M Behnes; K Mashayekhi; M Borggrefe; I Akin
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  In Reference to Trends, Etiologies, and Predictors of 90-Day Readmission After Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A National Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  James J Glazier; Amir Kaki
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 7.  Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Aditya Mandawat; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.546

8.  Dynamic Modulation of Device-Arterial Coupling to Determine Cardiac Output and Vascular Resistance.

Authors:  Steven P Keller; Brian Y Chang; Qing Tan; Zhengyang Zhang; Ahmad El Katerji; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 9.  Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: A Novel Approach in the Management of Patients With Acute Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Kevin Ergle; Parham Parto; Selim R Krim
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2016

Review 10.  A Standardized and Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Behnam N Tehrani; Alexander G Truesdell; Mitchell A Psotka; Carolyn Rosner; Ramesh Singh; Shashank S Sinha; Abdulla A Damluji; Wayne B Batchelor
Journal:  JACC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 12.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.