Literature DB >> 31410526

Arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization leads to significant clavicular tunnel widening in the early post-operative period.

Siva Thangaraju1,2, Serdar Cepni1,3, Petra Magosch4, Mark Tauber1,5, Peter Habermeyer1, Frank Martetschläger6,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilization techniques use bone tunnels in the clavicle and coracoid process. The tunnel size has been shown to have an impact on the fracture risk of clavicle and coracoid. The aim of the present study was to radiographically evaluate the alterations of the clavicular tunnel size in the early post-operative period. It was hypothesized that there would be a significant increase of tunnel size.
METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with acute high-grade ACJ (Rockwood type IV-V) injury underwent arthroscopic-assisted ACJ stabilization. The median age of the patients was 40 (26-66) years. For all patients, a single tunnel button-tape construct was used along with an additional ACJ tape cerclage. Radiologic measurements were undertaken on standardized Zanca films at two separate time points, immediate post-operative examination (IPO) and at late post-operative examination (> 4 months; LPO). The LPO radiographs were taken at a median follow-up period of 4.5 (3-6) months. Clavicular tunnel width (CT) and coracoclavicular distance (CCD) were measured using digital calipers by two independent examiners and the results are presented as median, range, and percentage.
RESULTS: The median CCD increased significantly from 9.5 (8-13) mm at IPO to 12 (7-20) mm at LPO (p < 0.05). Median tunnel size showed significant difference from 3 (3-4) mm at IPO to 5 (4-7) mm at LPO (p < 0.05). Despite a significant increase of 2 mm (66.6%) of the initial tunnel size, there was no correlation between tunnel widening and loss of reduction.
CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic ACJ stabilization with the use of bone tunnels led to a significant increase of clavicular tunnel size in the early post-operative period. This phenomenon carries a higher fracture risk, especially in high-impact athletes, which needs to be considered preoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular joint; Acromioclavicular joint stabilization; Acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation; Arthroscopy; Clavicle; Clavicle tunnel widening; Radiography

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31410526     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05662-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  44 in total

1.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint disruption: surgical technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Bancha Chernchujit; Thomas Tischer; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Management of acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Xinning Li; Richard Ma; Asheesh Bedi; David M Dines; David W Altchek; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Shoulder Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Injuries: Common Problems and Solutions.

Authors:  James D Wylie; Jeremiah D Johnson; Jessica DiVenere; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.182

4.  Complications related to anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

Authors:  Matthew D Milewski; Marc Tompkins; Juan M Giugale; Eric W Carson; Mark D Miller; David R Diduch
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Clavicle and coracoid process periprosthetic fractures as late post-operative complications in arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization.

Authors:  Siva Thangaraju; Mark Tauber; Peter Habermeyer; Frank Martetschläger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Markus Scheibel; Silvia Dröschel; Christian Gerhardt; Natascha Kraus
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Functional and Radiographic Outcomes After Allograft Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Sean Baran; Jeffrey G Belisle; Erin K Granger; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations in a coracoclavicular Double-TightRope technique: V-shaped versus parallel drill hole orientation.

Authors:  Natascha Kraus; Norbert P Haas; Markus Scheibel; Christian Gerhardt
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications after Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Stabilization.

Authors:  Tae Kang Lim; Whang Kyun Oh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-02-18

Review 10.  Complications following arthroscopic fixation of acromioclavicular separations: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Jarret M Woodmass; John G Esposito; Yohei Ono; Atiba A Nelson; Richard S Boorman; Gail M Thornton; Ian Ky Lo
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Minimum 10-Year Outcomes After Revision Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability.

Authors:  Daniel P Berthold; Lukas N Muench; Knut Beitzel; Simon Archambault; Aulon Jerliu; Mark P Cote; Bastian Scheiderer; Andreas B Imhoff; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-09-16

2.  The Kite technique: a new all-arthroscopic technique for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  V Campagna; V Piccinni; G Rotundo; Vittorio Candela; S Gumina
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Radiographic alterations in clavicular bone tunnel width following anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Daniel P Berthold; Lukas N Muench; Felix Dyrna; Colin L Uyeki; Mark P Cote; Andreas B Imhoff; Knut Beitzel; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  A modified single-endobutton technique combined with nice knot for treatment of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Fangning Hu; Shumei Han; Fanxiao Liu; Zhuang Wang; Honglei Jia; Fu Wang; Lingfei Hu; Jing Chen; Bomin Wang; Yongliang Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Reconstruction Combined with Open Acromioclavicular Reconstruction Using Knot Hiding Clavicular Implants Is a Stable Solution.

Authors:  Juha O Ranne; Severi O Salonen; Terho U Kainonen; Jussi A Kosola; Lasse L Lempainen; Mika T Siitonen; Pekka T Niemi
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-08-27

6.  Clavicular Tunnel Complications after Coracoclavicular Reconstruction in Acute Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Coracoid Loop versus Coracoid Tunnel Fixation.

Authors:  Neunghan Jeon; Nam Hong Choi; Joo Hyung Ha; Myonghwhan Kim; Tae Kang Lim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-15

7.  Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system.

Authors:  Marco-Christopher Rupp; Pavel M Kadantsev; Sebastian Siebenlist; Maximilian Hinz; Matthias J Feucht; Jonas Pogorzelski; Bastian Scheiderer; Andreas B Imhoff; Lukas N Muench; Daniel P Berthold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.114

8.  The frequency of reduction loss after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device, and its effect on clinical and radiological results.

Authors:  Engin Çarkçı; Ayşe Esin Polat; Tahsin Gürpınar
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.