Literature DB >> 29557509

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a Dog Bone button fixation alone versus Dog Bone button fixation augmented with acromioclavicular repair-a finite element analysis study.

Sermsak Sumanont1, Supachoke Nopamassiri2, Artit Boonrod3, Punyawat Apiwatanakul1, Arunnit Boonrod4, Chanakarn Phornphutkul5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suspension suture button fixation was frequently used to treat acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation. However, there were many studies reporting about complications and residual horizontal instability after fixation. Our study compared the stability of ACJ after fixation between coracoclavicular (CC) fixation alone and CC fixation combined with ACJ repair by using finite element analysis (FEA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A finite element model was created by using CT images from the normal shoulder. The model 1 was CC fixation with suture button alone, and the model 2 was CC fixation with suture button combined with ACJ repair. Three different forces (50, 100, 200 N) applied to the model in three planes; inferior, anterior and posterior direction load to the acromion. The von Mises stress of the implants and deformation at ACJs was recorded.
RESULTS: The ACJ repair in the model 2 could reduce the peak stress on the implant after applying the loading forces to the acromion which the ACJ repair could reduce the peak stress of the FiberWire at suture button about 90% when compared to model 1. And, the ACJ repair could reduce the deformation of the ACJ after applying the loading forces to the acromion in both vertical and horizontal planes.
CONCLUSION: This FEA supports that the high-grade injuries of the ACJ should be treated with CC fixation combined with ACJ repair because this technique provides excellent stability in both vertical and horizontal planes and reduces stress to the suture button.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acromioclavicular joint dislocation; Acromioclavicular joint repair; Finite element analysis; Suture button fixation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29557509     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2186-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  16 in total

1.  [Arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; N Kraus; S Greiner; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of chronic AC joint dislocations by transposition of the coracoacromial ligament augmented by the Tight Rope device: a technical note.

Authors:  Hamid Hosseini; Svenja Friedmann; Markus Tröger; Philipp Lobenhoffer; Jens D Agneskirchner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Prognostic factors to succeed in surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  J Barth; F Duparc; L Baverel; J Bahurel; B Toussaint; S Bertiaux; P Clavert; O Gastaud; N Brassart; E Beaudouin; P De Mourgues; D Berne; M Duport; N Najihi; P Boyer; B Faivre; A Meyer; G Nourissat; S Poulain; F Bruchou; J F Ménard
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Importance of additional temporary pin fixation combined coracoclavicular augmentation using a suture button device for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Chul-Hyun Cho; Beom-Soo Kim; Doo-Hyun Kwon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Complications after arthroscopic coracoclavicular reconstruction using a single adjustable-loop-length suspensory fixation device in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Sang-Jin Shin; Nam-Ki Kim
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 6.  [Management of old neglected posttraumatic acromioclavicular joint instability and arthrosis].

Authors:  A Hedtmann; H Fett; J Ludwig
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of effect of coracoid tunnel placement on load to failure of fixation during repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Joel V Ferreira; David Chowaniec; Elifho Obopilwe; Michael D Nowak; Robert A Arciero; Augustus D Mazzocca
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Complication rates and types of failure after arthroscopic acute acromioclavicular dislocation fixation. Prospective multicenter study of 116 cases.

Authors:  P Clavert; A Meyer; P Boyer; O Gastaud; J Barth; F Duparc
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.256

9.  Biomechanical analysis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation repair using coracoclavicular suspension devices in two different configurations.

Authors:  Ferran Abat; Juan Sarasquete; Luis Gerardo Natera; Ángel Calvo; Manuel Pérez-España; Néstor Zurita; Jesús Ferrer; Juan Carlos del Real; Eva Paz-Jimenez; Francisco Forriol
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-03-05

10.  Acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a comparative biomechanical study of the palmaris-longus tendon graft reconstruction with other augmentative methods in cadaveric models.

Authors:  Guntur E Luis; Chee-Khuen Yong; Deepak A Singh; S Sengupta; David Sk Choon
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  2 in total

1.  Better Radiographic Reduction and Lower Complication Rates With Combined Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Than With Isolated Coracoclavicular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jordan D Walters; Anthony Ignozzi; Francis Bustos; Brian C Werner; Stephen F Brockmeier
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-24

2.  Arthroscopic Acromioclavicular Fixation With Suture Tape Augmentation After Coracoclavicular Fixation With Dog Bone Button: Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Joong-Bae Seo; Kang Heo; Seong-Jun Kim; Jae-Uk Jung; Jae-Sung Yoo
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-10-22
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.