Paris D Butler1, Jonas A Nelson2, John P Fischer2, Jason D Wink2, Benjamin Chang2, Joshua Fosnot2, Liza C Wu2, Joseph M Serletti2. 1. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, South Tower, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Electronic address: paris.butler@uphs.upenn.edu. 2. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, South Tower, 7th Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates continue to rise, yet recent patterns based on race, age, and patient comorbidities have not been adequately assessed. METHODS: Women undergoing mastectomy only or mastectomy with IBR from 2005 to 2011 were identified in the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) data sets. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors independently associated with receipt of IBR. Thirty-day surgical complication rates after IBR were also assessed. RESULTS: Rates of IBR increased significantly over the study period from 26% of patients in 2005 to 40% in 2011. Non-Caucasian race, older age (≥45 years), obesity, and presence of comorbid conditions including diabetes mellitus, current smoking, and cardiovascular disease were all negatively associated with receipt of IBR. Surgical complication rates after IBR were not predicted by non-Caucasian race, older age, or presence of diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: This current assessment of IBR using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement data sets demonstrates that non-Caucasian and older women (≥45 years) continue to receive IBR at lower rates despite the lack of association of added risk of surgical morbidity. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) rates continue to rise, yet recent patterns based on race, age, and patient comorbidities have not been adequately assessed. METHODS:Women undergoing mastectomy only or mastectomy with IBR from 2005 to 2011 were identified in the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) data sets. A multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors independently associated with receipt of IBR. Thirty-day surgical complication rates after IBR were also assessed. RESULTS: Rates of IBR increased significantly over the study period from 26% of patients in 2005 to 40% in 2011. Non-Caucasian race, older age (≥45 years), obesity, and presence of comorbid conditions including diabetes mellitus, current smoking, and cardiovascular disease were all negatively associated with receipt of IBR. Surgical complication rates after IBR were not predicted by non-Caucasian race, older age, or presence of diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: This current assessment of IBR using the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement data sets demonstrates that non-Caucasian and older women (≥45 years) continue to receive IBR at lower rates despite the lack of association of added risk of surgical morbidity. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast Reconstruction; Health care disparity; NSQIP
Authors: Nicholas L Berlin; Adeyiza O Momoh; Ji Qi; Jennifer B Hamill; Hyungjin M Kim; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Adeyiza O Momoh; Kent A Griffith; Sarah T Hawley; Monica Morrow; Kevin C Ward; Ann S Hamilton; Dean Shumway; Steven J Katz; Reshma Jagsi Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Sophie E Mayer; Andrew F Olshan; Stephanie B Wheeler; Lisa A Carey; Chiu-Kit Tse; Mary Elizabeth Bell; Melissa A Troester Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Katherine B Santosa; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Shantanu N Razdan; Peter G Cordeiro; Claudia R Albornoz; Joseph J Disa; Hina J Panchal; Alice Y Ho; Adeyiza O Momoh; Evan Matros Journal: J Reconstr Microsurg Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 2.873
Authors: Sabine Oskar; Jonas A Nelson; Madeleine E V Hicks; Kenneth P Seier M S; Kay See Tan; Jacqueline J Chu; Scott West; Robert J Allen; Andrea V Barrio; Evan Matros; Anoushka M Afonso Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2022-01-01 Impact factor: 5.169
Authors: Chandler S Cortina; Carmen R Bergom; Julie Kijack; Abigail A Thorgerson; Chiang-Ching Spencer Huang; Amanda L Kong Journal: Surgery Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 4.348