Literature DB >> 2654367

Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants.

M R Rieger1, K Fareed, W K Adams, R A Tanquist.   

Abstract

Axisymmetric finite element models of three geometries were evaluated: a serrated solid with a 2-degree taper and a rectangular cross section; a cylindrical screw-type solid; and a finned solid with a 1 degree 9' taper and a circular cross section. Ten moduli of elasticity ranging from 0.348 to 74.96 psi x 10(6) were used for each geometry. Contour plots of the resulting Von Mises stresses were used to study the changing stress distribution patterns within the surrounding cortical bone. The results indicated that the serrated geometry led to high-stress concentrations at the tips of the bony ingrowth and near the neck of the implant. Low moduli of elasticity emphasized these concentrations. The nontapered screw-type geometry had high-stress concentrations at the base of the implant when high moduli were studied and at the neck of the implant when low moduli were studied. The conclusion of this study was that a tapered endosseous implant with a high elastic modulus would be most suitable for dental implantology. However, the design must not cause high-stress concentrations at the implant neck that commonly cause bone resorption.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2654367     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90379-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  10 in total

1.  Numerical assessment of bone remodeling around conventionally and early loaded titanium and titanium-zirconium alloy dental implants.

Authors:  Kıvanç Akça; Atılım Eser; Yeliz Çavuşoğlu; Elçin Sağırkaya; Murat Cavit Çehreli
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Stress and strain distribution in three different mini dental implant designs using in implant retained overdenture: a finite element analysis study.

Authors:  W Aunmeungtong; P Khongkhunthian; P Rungsiyakull
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-16

3.  Evaluation of design parameters of dental implant shape, diameter and length on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  M Mohammed Ibrahim; C Thulasingam; K S G A Nasser; V Balaji; M Rajakumar; P Rupkumar
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2011-08-20

4.  Predicting Peri-implant Stresses Around Titanium and Zirconium Dental Implants-A Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Manmohan Choudary Gujjarlapudi; Narayana Venkata Nunna; Sanjay Dutt Manne; Varalakshmi Reddy Sarikonda; Praveen Kumar Madineni; Reddi Narasimha Rao Meruva
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-03-13

5.  Developing a new dental implant design and comparing its biomechanical features with four designs.

Authors:  Mansour Rismanchian; Reza Birang; Mahdi Shahmoradi; Hassan Talebi; Reza Jabar Zare
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2010

6.  Evaluation of Micromovements and Stresses around Single Wide-Diameter and Double Implants for Replacing Mandibular Molar: A Three-Dimensional FEA.

Authors:  Shrikar R Desai; I Karthikeyan; Rika Singh
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2012-03-07

7.  Finite element analysis of stress concentration between surface coated implants and non surface coated implants - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Tammineedi Sv Satyanarayana; Rathika Rai; E Subramanyam; T Illango; Vishwabharathi Mutyala; Rajesh Akula
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-08-01

8.  Dentin Particulate for Bone Regeneration: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Giulia Brunello; Federica Zanotti; Gerard Scortecci; Lari Sapoznikov; Stefano Sivolella; Barbara Zavan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Finite element evaluation to compare stress pattern in bone surrounding implant with carbon fiber-reinforced poly-ether-ether-ketone and commercially pure titanium implants.

Authors:  Syeda Amtul Haseeb; Vinaya K C; Neha Vijaykumar; Anju Sree Durga B; Anju S Kumar; Sruthi M K
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-07-15

10.  FEM Analysis of Mandibular Prosthetic Overdenture Supported by Dental Implants: Evaluation of Different Retention Methods.

Authors:  M Cicciù; G Cervino; E Bramanti; F Lauritano; G Lo Gudice; L Scappaticci; A Rapparini; E Guglielmino; G Risitano
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.238

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.