Literature DB >> 26542975

Hierarchical Bayesian estimation and hypothesis testing for delay discounting tasks.

Benjamin T Vincent1.   

Abstract

A state-of-the-art data analysis procedure is presented to conduct hierarchical Bayesian inference and hypothesis testing on delay discounting data. The delay discounting task is a key experimental paradigm used across a wide range of disciplines from economics, cognitive science, and neuroscience, all of which seek to understand how humans or animals trade off the immediacy verses the magnitude of a reward. Bayesian estimation allows rich inferences to be drawn, along with measures of confidence, based upon limited and noisy behavioural data. Hierarchical modelling allows more precise inferences to be made, thus using sometimes expensive or difficult to obtain data in the most efficient way. The proposed probabilistic generative model describes how participants compare the present subjective value of reward choices on a trial-to-trial basis, estimates participant- and group-level parameters. We infer discount rate as a function of reward size, allowing the magnitude effect to be measured. Demonstrations are provided to show how this analysis approach can aid hypothesis testing. The analysis is demonstrated on data from the popular 27-item monetary choice questionnaire (Kirby, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 457-462 2009), but will accept data from a range of protocols, including adaptive procedures. The software is made freely available to researchers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian estimation; Decision making; Delay discounting; Financial psychophysics; Inter-temporal choice; MCMC; Magnitude effect; Time preference

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26542975     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-015-0672-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  11 in total

1.  Determining informative priors for cognitive models.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Wolf Vanpaemel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

2.  Linking Delay Discounting and Substance Use Disorders: Genotypes and Phenotypes.

Authors:  Suzanne H Mitchell
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-07-10

3.  Can a single model account for both risky choices and inter-temporal choices? Testing the assumptions underlying models of risky inter-temporal choice.

Authors:  Ashley Luckman; Chris Donkin; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

4.  A Model Guided Approach to Evoke Homogeneous Behavior During Temporal Reward and Loss Discounting.

Authors:  Janine Thome; Mathieu Pinger; Patrick Halli; Daniel Durstewitz; Wolfgang H Sommer; Peter Kirsch; Georgia Koppe
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.435

5.  On the Appropriate Measure to Estimate Hyperbolic Discounting Rate (K) using the Method of Least Squares.

Authors:  Harli R Berk; Tanya A Gupta; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-08-12

6.  Revealing Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Reinforcement Learning and Decision-Making With the hBayesDM Package.

Authors:  Woo-Young Ahn; Nathaniel Haines; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Comput Psychiatr       Date:  2017-10-01

7.  ADOpy: a python package for adaptive design optimization.

Authors:  Jaeyeong Yang; Mark A Pitt; Woo-Young Ahn; Jay I Myung
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04

8.  Rationally inattentive intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Samuel J Gershman; Rahul Bhui
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Good Things for Those Who Wait: Predictive Modeling Highlights Importance of Delay Discounting for Income Attainment.

Authors:  William H Hampton; Nima Asadi; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-09-03

10.  Hunger increases delay discounting of food and non-food rewards.

Authors:  Jordan Skrynka; Benjamin T Vincent
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.