Literature DB >> 32901345

ADOpy: a python package for adaptive design optimization.

Jaeyeong Yang1, Mark A Pitt2, Woo-Young Ahn3, Jay I Myung4.   

Abstract

Experimental design is fundamental to research, but formal methods to identify good designs are lacking. Advances in Bayesian statistics and machine learning offer algorithm-based ways to identify good experimental designs. Adaptive design optimization (ADO; Cavagnaro, Myung, Pitt, & Kujala, 2010; Myung, Cavagnaro, & Pitt, 2013) is one such method. It works by maximizing the informativeness and efficiency of data collection, thereby improving inference. ADO is a general-purpose method for conducting adaptive experiments on the fly and can lead to rapid accumulation of information about the phenomenon of interest with the fewest number of trials. The nontrivial technical skills required to use ADO have been a barrier to its wider adoption. To increase its accessibility to experimentalists at large, we introduce an open-source Python package, ADOpy, that implements ADO for optimizing experimental design. The package, available on GitHub, is written using high-level modular-based commands such that users do not have to understand the computational details of the ADO algorithm. In this paper, we first provide a tutorial introduction to ADOpy and ADO itself, and then illustrate its use in three walk-through examples: psychometric function estimation, delay discounting, and risky choice. Simulation data are also provided to demonstrate how ADO designs compare with other designs (random, staircase).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian adaptive experimentation; Cognitive modeling; Delay discounting; Optimal experimental design; Psychometric function estimation; Risky choice

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32901345      PMCID: PMC9335234          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01386-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  36 in total

1.  Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task.

Authors:  Thomas S Wallsten; Timothy J Pleskac; C W Lejuez
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  How optimal stimuli for sensory neurons are constrained by network architecture.

Authors:  Christopher DiMattina; Kechen Zhang
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Active data collection for efficient estimation and comparison of nonlinear neural models.

Authors:  Christopher DiMattina; Kechen Zhang
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation.

Authors:  P E King-Smith; S S Grigsby; A J Vingrys; S C Benes; A Supowit
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method.

Authors:  A B Watson; D G Pelli
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-02

6.  Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making.

Authors:  Ming Hsu; Meghana Bhatt; Ralph Adolphs; Daniel Tranel; Colin F Camerer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Model discrimination through adaptive experimentation.

Authors:  Daniel R Cavagnaro; Mark A Pitt; Jay I Myung
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-02

8.  On the Functional Form of Temporal Discounting: An Optimized Adaptive Test.

Authors:  Daniel R Cavagnaro; Gabriel J Aranovich; Samuel M McClure; Mark A Pitt; Jay I Myung
Journal:  J Risk Uncertain       Date:  2016-09-13

9.  Generating Stimuli for Neuroscience Using PsychoPy.

Authors:  Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Rapid, precise, and reliable measurement of delay discounting using a Bayesian learning algorithm.

Authors:  Woo-Young Ahn; Hairong Gu; Yitong Shen; Nathaniel Haines; Hunter A Hahn; Julie E Teater; Jay I Myung; Mark A Pitt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rumination Derails Reinforcement Learning with Possible Implications for Ineffective Behavior.

Authors:  Peter Hitchcock; Evan Forman; Nina Rothstein; Fengqing Zhang; John Kounios; Yael Niv; Chris Sims
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-11-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.