Literature DB >> 29601060

Revealing Neurocomputational Mechanisms of Reinforcement Learning and Decision-Making With the hBayesDM Package.

Woo-Young Ahn1, Nathaniel Haines1, Lei Zhang2.   

Abstract

Reinforcement learning and decision-making (RLDM) provide a quantitative framework and computational theories with which we can disentangle psychiatric conditions into the basic dimensions of neurocognitive functioning. RLDM offer a novel approach to assessing and potentially diagnosing psychiatric patients, and there is growing enthusiasm for both RLDM and computational psychiatry among clinical researchers. Such a framework can also provide insights into the brain substrates of particular RLDM processes, as exemplified by model-based analysis of data from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or electroencephalography (EEG). However, researchers often find the approach too technical and have difficulty adopting it for their research. Thus, a critical need remains to develop a user-friendly tool for the wide dissemination of computational psychiatric methods. We introduce an R package called hBayesDM (hierarchical Bayesian modeling of Decision-Making tasks), which offers computational modeling of an array of RLDM tasks and social exchange games. The hBayesDM package offers state-of-the-art hierarchical Bayesian modeling, in which both individual and group parameters (i.e., posterior distributions) are estimated simultaneously in a mutually constraining fashion. At the same time, the package is extremely user-friendly: users can perform computational modeling, output visualization, and Bayesian model comparisons, each with a single line of coding. Users can also extract the trial-by-trial latent variables (e.g., prediction errors) required for model-based fMRI/EEG. With the hBayesDM package, we anticipate that anyone with minimal knowledge of programming can take advantage of cutting-edge computational-modeling approaches to investigate the underlying processes of and interactions between multiple decision-making (e.g., goal-directed, habitual, and Pavlovian) systems. In this way, we expect that the hBayesDM package will contribute to the dissemination of advanced modeling approaches and enable a wide range of researchers to easily perform computational psychiatric research within different populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; hierarchical Bayesian modeling; model-based fMRI; reinforcement learning

Year:  2017        PMID: 29601060      PMCID: PMC5869013          DOI: 10.1162/CPSY_a_00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Psychiatr        ISSN: 2379-6227


  87 in total

1.  Model Comparisons and Model Selections Based on Generalization Criterion Methodology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 2.  Model-based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision making.

Authors:  John P O'Doherty; Alan Hampton; Hackjin Kim
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-04-07       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Colin Camerer; P Read Montague
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Dissociating valence of outcome from behavioral control in human orbital and ventral prefrontal cortices.

Authors:  John O'Doherty; Hugo Critchley; Ralf Deichmann; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Integrating behavioral economics and behavioral genetics: delayed reward discounting as an endophenotype for addictive disorders.

Authors:  James MacKillop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Ultimatum bargaining behavior of people affected by schizophrenia.

Authors:  Nirit Agay; Shmuel Kron; Ziv Carmel; Shlomo Mendlovic; Yechiel Levkovitz
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Reduction of Pavlovian Bias in Schizophrenia: Enhanced Effects in Clozapine-Administered Patients.

Authors:  Matthew A Albrecht; James A Waltz; James F Cavanagh; Michael J Frank; James M Gold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Utility of Machine-Learning Approaches to Identify Behavioral Markers for Substance Use Disorders: Impulsivity Dimensions as Predictors of Current Cocaine Dependence.

Authors:  Woo-Young Ahn; Divya Ramesh; Frederick Gerard Moeller; Jasmin Vassileva
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 9.  Charting the landscape of priority problems in psychiatry, part 1: classification and diagnosis.

Authors:  Klaas E Stephan; Dominik R Bach; Paul C Fletcher; Jonathan Flint; Michael J Frank; Karl J Friston; Andreas Heinz; Quentin J M Huys; Michael J Owen; Elisabeth B Binder; Peter Dayan; Eve C Johnstone; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; P Read Montague; Ulrich Schnyder; Xiao-Jing Wang; Michael Breakspear
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 27.083

10.  L-DOPA disrupts activity in the nucleus accumbens during reversal learning in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Roshan Cools; Simon J G Lewis; Luke Clark; Roger A Barker; Trevor W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 7.853

View more
  57 in total

1.  Using reinforcement learning models in social neuroscience: frameworks, pitfalls and suggestions of best practices.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Lukas Lengersdorff; Nace Mikus; Jan Gläscher; Claus Lamm
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying immoral decisions benefiting self or others.

Authors:  Chen Qu; Yang Hu; Zixuan Tang; Edmund Derrington; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Moving beyond Ordinary Factor Analysis in Studies of Personality and Personality Disorder: A Computational Modeling Perspective.

Authors:  Nathaniel Haines; Theodore P Beauchaine
Journal:  Psychopathology       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 1.944

4.  Using dynamic monitoring of choices to predict and understand risk preferences.

Authors:  Paul E Stillman; Ian Krajbich; Melissa J Ferguson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A computational model of the Cambridge gambling task with applications to substance use disorders.

Authors:  Ricardo J Romeu; Nathaniel Haines; Woo-Young Ahn; Jerome R Busemeyer; Jasmin Vassileva
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Neural basis of corruption in power-holders.

Authors:  Yang Hu; Chen Hu; Edmund Derrington; Brice Corgnet; Chen Qu; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Relative insensitivity to time-out punishments induced by win-paired cues in a rat gambling task.

Authors:  Angela J Langdon; Brett A Hathaway; Samuel Zorowitz; Cailean B W Harris; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The Outcome-Representation Learning Model: A Novel Reinforcement Learning Model of the Iowa Gambling Task.

Authors:  Nathaniel Haines; Jasmin Vassileva; Woo-Young Ahn
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-10-05

9.  When Implicit Prosociality Trumps Selfishness: The Neural Valuation System Underpins More Optimal Choices When Learning to Avoid Harm to Others Than to Oneself.

Authors:  Lukas L Lengersdorff; Isabella C Wagner; Patricia L Lockwood; Claus Lamm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Right Temporoparietal Junction Underlies Avoidance of Moral Transgression in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Yang Hu; Alessandra M Pereira; Xiaoxue Gao; Brunno M Campos; Edmund Derrington; Brice Corgnet; Xiaolin Zhou; Fernando Cendes; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.