| Literature DB >> 26541547 |
Tifeng Shan1, Shaojun Pang2, Jing Li3,4, Xia Li5,6, Li Su7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Undaria pinnatifida is an important economic brown alga in East Asian countries. However, its genetic and genomic information is very scarce, which hinders further research in this species. A high-density genetic map is a basic tool for fundamental and applied research such as discovery of functional genes and mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL). In this study the recently developed specific length amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) technology was employed to construct a high-density genetic linkage map and locate a sex determining locus for U. pinnatifida.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26541547 PMCID: PMC4635539 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-015-2184-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Summary of the developed specific length amplified fragment (SLAF) markers
| Samples | SLAF number | Total depth | Average depth |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal parent | 134,975 | 6,868,171 | 50.88× |
| Paternal parent | 139,873 | 7,607,425 | 54.39× |
| Offspring | 104,831 | 855,106 | 8.16× |
Polymorphism analysis results of the SLAF markers
| SLAF Type | Polymorphic | Non-polymorphic | Repetitive | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 33,093 | 169,220 | 259 | 202,572 |
| Percentage (%) | 16.34 | 83.54 | 0.13 | 100 |
Fig. 1The number of markers in each of eight segregation patterns
The characteristics of the 30 linkage groups constructed in Undaria pinnatifida
| Linkage group | No. of markers | Total distance(cM) | Average distance(cM) | Maximum gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 244 | 53.02 | 0.22 | 10.55 |
| 2 | 135 | 62.24 | 0.46 | 12.28 |
| 3 | 183 | 76.61 | 0.42 | 11.03 |
| 4 | 159 | 70.43 | 0.44 | 8.18 |
| 5 | 126 | 64.27 | 0.51 | 5.97 |
| 6 | 160 | 73.15 | 0.46 | 8.61 |
| 7 | 110 | 47.42 | 0.43 | 6.97 |
| 8 | 231 | 55.96 | 0.24 | 6.17 |
| 9 | 172 | 80.33 | 0.47 | 9.81 |
| 10 | 221 | 106.95 | 0.48 | 6.22 |
| 11 | 98 | 50.26 | 0.51 | 8.62 |
| 12 | 128 | 68.67 | 0.54 | 6.94 |
| 13 | 126 | 56.63 | 0.45 | 3.75 |
| 14 | 126 | 66.57 | 0.53 | 9.72 |
| 15 | 193 | 51.05 | 0.26 | 6.32 |
| 16 | 136 | 61.57 | 0.45 | 7.46 |
| 17 | 274 | 93.97 | 0.34 | 7.44 |
| 18 | 292 | 77.93 | 0.27 | 7.43 |
| 19 | 145 | 49.90 | 0.34 | 5.15 |
| 20 | 181 | 53.97 | 0.30 | 6.26 |
| 21 | 164 | 58.40 | 0.36 | 7.43 |
| 22 | 100 | 68.81 | 0.69 | 13.17 |
| 23 | 121 | 64.51 | 0.53 | 9.31 |
| 24 | 105 | 50.76 | 0.48 | 8.61 |
| 25 | 206 | 51.83 | 0.25 | 5.21 |
| 26 | 96 | 37.41 | 0.39 | 6.88 |
| 27 | 93 | 20.12 | 0.22 | 2.48 |
| 28 | 93 | 29.46 | 0.32 | 4.12 |
| 29 | 107 | 63.22 | 0.59 | 9.33 |
| 30 | 102 | 50.86 | 0.50 | 4.73 |
| Total | 4,627 | 1,816.28 | 0.39 | 13.17 |
Fig. 2Distribution of SLAF markers on 30 linkage groups of Undaria pinnatifida. A black bar indicates a SLAF marker. The x-axis indicates linkage group number and the y-axis the map distance (cM)
Fig. 3QTL analysis of the sex phenotype on linkage groups. The x-axis indicates the linkage groups and the marker order. The horizontal gray line indicates the threshold of the LOD score (4.1) for significance (P = 0.01) at the whole genomic level
Fig. 4Linkage group 22 and the location of cosegregating markers with the sex phenotype