| Literature DB >> 26541375 |
Asif Rahman1, Belen Lafon1, Marom Bikson2.
Abstract
Since 2000, there has been rapid acceleration in the use of tDCS in both clinical and cognitive neuroscience research, encouraged by the simplicity of the technique (two electrodes and a battery powered stimulator) and the perception that tDCS protocols can be simply designed by placing the anode over the cortex to "excite," and the cathode over cortex to "inhibit." A specific and predictive understanding of tDCS needs experimental data to be placed into a quantitative framework. Biologically constrained computational models provide a useful framework within which to interpret results from empirical studies and generate novel, testable hypotheses. Although not without caveats, computational models provide a tool for exploring cognitive and brain processes, are amenable to quantitative analysis, and can inspire novel empirical work that might be difficult to intuit simply by examining experimental results. We approach modeling the effects of tDCS on neurons from multiple levels: modeling the electric field distribution, modeling single-compartment effects, and finally with multicompartment neuron models.Keywords: Computational neuroscience; Hodgkin–Huxley models; Numerical simulation; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26541375 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.09.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Brain Res ISSN: 0079-6123 Impact factor: 2.453