Literature DB >> 27489368

Cerebellar tDCS dissociates the timing of perceptual decisions from perceptual change in speech.

Daniel R Lametti1,2, Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes3, James Bonaiuto2, Sven Bestmann2, John C Rothwell2.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging studies suggest that the cerebellum might play a role in both speech perception and speech perceptual learning. However, it remains unclear what this role is: does the cerebellum help shape the perceptual decision, or does it contribute to the timing of perceptual decisions? To test this, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in combination with a speech perception task. Participants experienced a series of speech perceptual tests designed to measure and then manipulate (via training) their perception of a phonetic contrast. One group received cerebellar tDCS during speech perceptual learning, and a different group received sham tDCS during the same task. Both groups showed similar learning-related changes in speech perception that transferred to a different phonetic contrast. For both trained and untrained speech perceptual decisions, cerebellar tDCS significantly increased the time it took participants to indicate their decisions with a keyboard press. By analyzing perceptual responses made by both hands, we present evidence that cerebellar tDCS disrupted the timing of perceptual decisions, while leaving the eventual decision unaltered. In support of this conclusion, we use the drift diffusion model to decompose the data into processes that determine the outcome of perceptual decision-making and those that do not. The modeling suggests that cerebellar tDCS disrupted processes unrelated to decision-making. Taken together, the empirical data and modeling demonstrate that right cerebellar tDCS dissociates the timing of perceptual decisions from perceptual change. The results provide initial evidence in healthy humans that the cerebellum critically contributes to speech timing in the perceptual domain.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebellum; perceptual learning; speech perception; timing; transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27489368      PMCID: PMC5102311          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00433.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  46 in total

1.  Involvement of the cerebellum in semantic discrimination: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Huadong Xiang; Chongyu Lin; Xiaohai Ma; Zhaoqi Zhang; James M Bower; Xuchu Weng; Jia-Hong Gao
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Phoneme and word recognition in the auditory ventral stream.

Authors:  Iain DeWitt; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory.

Authors:  R Ferrucci; S Marceglia; M Vergari; F Cogiamanian; S Mrakic-Sposta; F Mameli; S Zago; S Barbieri; A Priori
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Plasticity in the human speech motor system drives changes in speech perception.

Authors:  Daniel R Lametti; Amélie Rochet-Capellan; Emily Neufeld; Douglas M Shiller; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Vowel category boundaries enhance cortical and behavioral responses to speech feedback alterations.

Authors:  Caroline A Niziolek; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing.

Authors:  Elise Lesage; Blaire E Morgan; Andrew C Olson; Antje S Meyer; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Modulation of linguistic prediction by TDCS of the right lateral cerebellum.

Authors:  R C Miall; J Antony; A Goldsmith-Sumner; S R Harding; C McGovern; J L Winter
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  4 in total

1.  Can perceptual training alter the effect of visual biofeedback in speech-motor learning?

Authors:  Adam Klaus; Daniel R Lametti; Douglas M Shiller; Tara McAllister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A Causal Role of the Cerebellum in Auditory Feedback Control of Vocal Production.

Authors:  Danhua Peng; Qing Lin; Yichen Chang; Jeffery A Jones; Guoqing Jia; Xi Chen; Peng Liu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Targeting the Human Cerebellum with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Modulate Behavior: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Viola Oldrati; Dennis J L G Schutter
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 4.  A Brief History of Cerebellar Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Gustavo V Ponce; Jana Klaus; Dennis J L G Schutter
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.648

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.