Literature DB >> 26538657

Memory Meets Control in Hippocampal and Striatal Binding of Stimuli, Responses, and Attentional Control States.

Jiefeng Jiang1, Nadia M Brashier2, Tobias Egner3.   

Abstract

The human brain encodes experience in an integrative fashion by binding together the various features of an event (i.e., stimuli and responses) into memory "event files." A subsequent reoccurrence of an event feature can then cue the retrieval of the memory file to "prime" cognition and action. Intriguingly, recent behavioral studies indicate that, in addition to linking concrete stimulus and response features, event coding may also incorporate more abstract, "internal" event features such as attentional control states. In the present study, we used fMRI in healthy human volunteers to determine the neural mechanisms supporting this type of holistic event binding. Specifically, we combined fMRI with a task protocol that dissociated the expression of event feature-binding effects pertaining to concrete stimulus and response features, stimulus categories, and attentional control demands. Using multivariate neural pattern classification, we show that the hippocampus and putamen integrate event attributes across all of these levels in conjunction with other regions representing concrete-feature-selective (primarily visual cortex), category-selective (posterior frontal cortex), and control demand-selective (insula, caudate, anterior cingulate, and parietal cortex) event information. Together, these results suggest that the hippocampus and putamen are involved in binding together holistic event memories that link physical stimulus and response characteristics with internal representations of stimulus categories and attentional control states. These bindings then presumably afford shortcuts to adaptive information processing and response selection in the face of recurring events. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Memory binds together the different features of our experience, such as an observed stimulus and concurrent motor responses, into so-called event files. Recent behavioral studies suggest that the observer's internal attentional state might also become integrated into the event memory. Here, we used fMRI to determine the brain areas responsible for binding together event information pertaining to concrete stimulus and response features, stimulus categories, and internal attentional control states. We found that neural signals in the hippocampus and putamen contained information about all of these event attributes and could predict behavioral priming effects stemming from these features. Therefore, medial temporal lobe and dorsal striatum structures appear to be involved in binding internal control states to event memories.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/3514885-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26538657      PMCID: PMC4635135          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2957-15.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  58 in total

1.  Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; Larry L Jacoby; Swati Chanani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Contextual control over task-set retrieval.

Authors:  Matthew J C Crump; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions.

Authors:  Tara A Niendam; Angela R Laird; Kimberly L Ray; Y Monica Dean; David C Glahn; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task.

Authors:  Tobias Egner; Joy Hirsch
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Attention sharpens the distinction between expected and unexpected percepts in the visual brain.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Greater neural pattern similarity across repetitions is associated with better memory.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhonglin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Integrating memories in the human brain: hippocampal-midbrain encoding of overlapping events.

Authors:  Daphna Shohamy; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  An insula-frontostriatal network mediates flexible cognitive control by adaptively predicting changing control demands.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Jeffrey Beck; Katherine Heller; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Evidence for holistic episodic recollection via hippocampal pattern completion.

Authors:  Aidan J Horner; James A Bisby; Daniel Bush; Wen-Jing Lin; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  14 in total

1.  Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The Caudate Nucleus Mediates Learning of Stimulus-Control State Associations.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Jiefeng Jiang; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual Prediction Error Spreads Across Object Features in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Integrated externally and internally generated task predictions jointly guide cognitive control in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jiefeng Jiang; Anthony D Wagner; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Memories of control: One-shot episodic learning of item-specific stimulus-control associations.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Christina U Pfeuffer; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-02-14

Review 6.  Cortical and subcortical contributions to context-control learning.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Chiu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Performance feedback promotes proactive but not reactive adaptation of conflict-control.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Sophie Tan; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A Representational Similarity Analysis of Cognitive Control during Color-Word Stroop.

Authors:  Michael C Freund; Julie M Bugg; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Sex Differences in Fiber Connection between the Striatum and Subcortical and Cortical Regions.

Authors:  Xuemei Lei; Zhuo Han; Chuansheng Chen; Lu Bai; Gui Xue; Qi Dong
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 10.  Measuring Adaptive Control in Conflict Tasks.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Julie M Bugg; James R Schmidt; Matthew J C Crump; Daniel H Weissman; Wim Notebaert; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.