Literature DB >> 20829453

Greater neural pattern similarity across repetitions is associated with better memory.

Gui Xue1, Qi Dong, Chuansheng Chen, Zhonglin Lu, Jeanette A Mumford, Russell A Poldrack.   

Abstract

Repeated study improves memory, but the underlying neural mechanisms of this improvement are not well understood. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging and representational similarity analysis of brain activity, we found that, compared with forgotten items, subsequently remembered faces and words showed greater similarity in neural activation across multiple study in many brain regions, including (but not limited to) the regions whose mean activities were correlated with subsequent memory. This result addresses a longstanding debate in the study of memory by showing that successful episodic memory encoding occurs when the same neural representations are more precisely reactivated across study episodes, rather than when patterns of activation are more variable across time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20829453      PMCID: PMC2952039          DOI: 10.1126/science.1193125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  22 in total

1.  Reactivation of motor brain areas during explicit memory for actions.

Authors:  L Nyberg; K M Petersson; L G Nilsson; J Sandblom; C Aberg; M Ingvar
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval.

Authors:  L Nyberg; R Habib; A R McIntosh; E Tulving
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The role of the fusiform gyrus in successful encoding of face stimuli.

Authors:  M A Kuskowski; J V Pardo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Functional dissociation among components of remembering: control, perceived oldness, and content.

Authors:  Mark E Wheeler; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Measuring functional connectivity during distinct stages of a cognitive task.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Category-specific cortical activity precedes retrieval during memory search.

Authors:  Sean M Polyn; Vaidehi S Natu; Jonathan D Cohen; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep.

Authors:  Daoyun Ji; Matthew A Wilson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-17       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Reproducibility distinguishes conscious from nonconscious neural representations.

Authors:  Aaron Schurger; Francisco Pereira; Anne Treisman; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The "visual word form area" is involved in successful memory encoding of both words and faces.

Authors:  Leilei Mei; Gui Xue; Chuansheng Chen; Feng Xue; Mingxia Zhang; Qi Dong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Internally generated reactivation of single neurons in human hippocampus during free recall.

Authors:  Hagar Gelbard-Sagiv; Roy Mukamel; Michal Harel; Rafael Malach; Itzhak Fried
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  103 in total

1.  Complementary role of frontoparietal activity and cortical pattern similarity in successful episodic memory encoding.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Qi Dong; Chuansheng Chen; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jeanette A Mumford; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Attention promotes episodic encoding by stabilizing hippocampal representations.

Authors:  Mariam Aly; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cortical reinstatement mediates the relationship between content-specific encoding activity and subsequent recollection decisions.

Authors:  Alan M Gordon; Jesse Rissman; Roozbeh Kiani; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Should I buy this book? How we construct prospective value.

Authors:  Jamil P Bhanji; Mauricio R Delgado
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Repetition suppression and multi-voxel pattern similarity differentially track implicit and explicit visual memory.

Authors:  Emily J Ward; Marvin M Chun; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The importance of being variable.

Authors:  Douglas D Garrett; Natasa Kovacevic; Anthony R McIntosh; Cheryl L Grady
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Cortical activity is more stable when sensory stimuli are consciously perceived.

Authors:  Aaron Schurger; Ioannis Sarigiannidis; Lionel Naccache; Jacobo D Sitt; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Neural Overlap in Item Representations Across Episodes Impairs Context Memory.

Authors:  Ghootae Kim; Kenneth A Norman; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Local response heterogeneity indexes experience-based neural differentiation in reading.

Authors:  Jeremy J Purcell; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Global similarity and pattern separation in the human medial temporal lobe predict subsequent memory.

Authors:  Karen F LaRocque; Mary E Smith; Valerie A Carr; Nathan Witthoft; Kalanit Grill-Spector; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.