Literature DB >> 26538465

Factors underlying genotypic differences in the induction of photosynthesis in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr].

Mochamad Arief Soleh1,2, Yu Tanaka1,3, Yuko Nomoto1, Yu Iwahashi1,3, Keiichiro Nakashima1, Yasuko Fukuda1, Stephen P Long3, Tatsuhiko Shiraiwa1.   

Abstract

Crop leaves are subject to continually changing light levels in the field. Photosynthetic efficiency of a crop canopy and productivity will depend significantly on how quickly a leaf can acclimate to a change. One measure of speed of response is the rate of photosynthesis increase toward its steady state on transition from low to high light. This rate was measured for seven genotypes of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. After 10 min of illumination, cultivar 'UA4805' (UA) had achieved a leaf photosynthetic rate (Pn ) of 23.2 μmol · m(-2)  · s(-1) , close to its steady-state rate, while the slowest cultivar 'Tachinagaha' (Tc) had only reached 13.0 μmol · m(-2)  · s(-1) and was still many minutes from obtaining steady state. This difference was further investigated by examining induction at a range of carbon dioxide concentrations. Applying a biochemical model of limitations to photosynthesis to the responses of Pn to intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci ), it was found that the speed of apparent in vivo activation of ribulose-1:5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) was responsible for this difference. Sequence analysis of the Rubisco activase gene revealed single nucleotide polymorphisms that could relate to this difference. The results show a potential route for selection of cultivars with increased photosynthetic efficiency in fluctuating light.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  light intensity; non-steady-state photosynthesis; photosynthetic capacity; photosynthetic induction response; stomatal dynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26538465     DOI: 10.1111/pce.12674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell Environ        ISSN: 0140-7791            Impact factor:   7.228


  20 in total

Review 1.  Effects of high CO2 levels on dynamic photosynthesis: carbon gain, mechanisms, and environmental interactions.

Authors:  Hajime Tomimatsu; Yanhong Tang
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Identification of large variation in the photosynthetic induction response among 37 soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes that is not correlated with steady-state photosynthetic capacity.

Authors:  M A Soleh; Y Tanaka; S Y Kim; S C Huber; K Sakoda; T Shiraiwa
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Fluctuating Light Takes Crop Photosynthesis on a Rollercoaster Ride.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Alejandro Morales; Jeremy Harbinson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Stomatal, mesophyll conductance, and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis during induction.

Authors:  Kazuma Sakoda; Wataru Yamori; Michael Groszmann; John R Evans
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Photosynthetic induction and its diffusional, carboxylation and electron transport processes as affected by CO2 partial pressure, temperature, air humidity and blue irradiance.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Johannes Kromdijk; Jeremy Harbinson; Ep Heuvelink; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Photosynthesis in the fleeting shadows: an overlooked opportunity for increasing crop productivity?

Authors:  Yu Wang; Steven J Burgess; Elsa M de Becker; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.417

7.  Slow induction of photosynthesis on shade to sun transitions in wheat may cost at least 21% of productivity.

Authors:  Samuel H Taylor; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Elevated CO2 increases photosynthesis in fluctuating irradiance regardless of photosynthetic induction state.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Dianfan Zhou; Ep Heuvelink; Jeremy Harbinson; Alejandro Morales; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 6.992

9.  Dynamic light caused less photosynthetic suppression, rather than more, under nitrogen deficit conditions than under sufficient nitrogen supply conditions in soybean.

Authors:  Yu-Ting Li; Ying Li; Yue-Nan Li; Ying Liang; Qiang Sun; Geng Li; Peng Liu; Zi-Shan Zhang; Hui-Yuan Gao
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Variation in photosynthetic induction between rice accessions and its potential for improving productivity.

Authors:  Liana G Acevedo-Siaca; Robert Coe; Yu Wang; Johannes Kromdijk; W Paul Quick; Stephen P Long
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 10.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.