Literature DB >> 27878416

Identification of large variation in the photosynthetic induction response among 37 soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes that is not correlated with steady-state photosynthetic capacity.

M A Soleh1,2, Y Tanaka3, S Y Kim4, S C Huber4, K Sakoda1, T Shiraiwa1.   

Abstract

Irradiance continuously fluctuates during the day in the field. The speed of the induction response of photosynthesis in high light affects the cumulative carbon gain of the plant and could impact growth and yield. The photosynthetic induction response and its relationship with the photosynthetic capacity under steady-state conditions (P max) were evaluated in 37 diverse soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] genotypes. The induction response of leaf photosynthesis showed large variation among the soybean genotypes. After 5 min illumination with strong light, genotype NAM23 had the highest leaf photosynthetic rate of 33.8 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1, while genotype NAM12 showed the lowest rate at 4.7 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1. Cumulative CO2 fixation (CCF) during the first 5 min of high light exposure ranged from 5.5 mmol CO2 m-2 for NAM23 to 0.81 mmol CO2 m-2 for NAM12. The difference in the induction response among genotypes was consistent throughout the growth season. However, there was no significant correlation between CCF and P max among genotypes suggesting that different mechanisms regulate P max and the induction response. The observed variation in the induction response was mainly attributed to ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) activation, but soybean lines differing in the induction response did not differ in the leaf content of Rubisco activase α- and β-proteins. Future studies will be focused on identifying molecular determinants of the photosynthetic induction response and determining whether this trait could be an important breeding target to achieve improved growth of soybeans in the field.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Photosynthetic capacity; Photosynthetic induction response; Rubisco activase; Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27878416     DOI: 10.1007/s11120-016-0323-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photosynth Res        ISSN: 0166-8595            Impact factor:   3.573


  28 in total

1.  Light modulation of Rubisco in Arabidopsis requires a capacity for redox regulation of the larger Rubisco activase isoform.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Russell P Kallis; Robert G Ewy; Archie R Portis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Improving yield by exploiting mechanisms underlying natural variation of photosynthesis.

Authors:  Tracy Lawson; David M Kramer; Christine A Raines
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 3.  Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?

Authors:  Stephen P Long; Xin-Guang Zhu; Shawna L Naidu; Donald R Ort
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.228

4.  Structure of green-type Rubisco activase from tobacco.

Authors:  Mathias Stotz; Oliver Mueller-Cajar; Susanne Ciniawsky; Petra Wendler; F Ulrich Hartl; Andreas Bracher; Manajit Hayer-Hartl
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  The regulatory properties of Rubisco activase differ among species and affect photosynthetic induction during light transitions.

Authors:  A Elizabete Carmo-Silva; Michael E Salvucci
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Nonsteady-State Photosynthesis following an Increase in Photon Flux Density (PFD) : Effects of Magnitude and Duration of Initial PFD.

Authors:  R B Jackson; I E Woodrow; K A Mott
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  A novel role for light in the activation of ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase.

Authors:  W J Campbell; W L Ogren
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Expression quantitative trait loci analysis of two genes encoding rubisco activase in soybean.

Authors:  Zhitong Yin; Fanfan Meng; Haina Song; Xiaolin Wang; Xiaoming Xu; Deyue Yu
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Redesigning photosynthesis to sustainably meet global food and bioenergy demand.

Authors:  Donald R Ort; Sabeeha S Merchant; Jean Alric; Alice Barkan; Robert E Blankenship; Ralph Bock; Roberta Croce; Maureen R Hanson; Julian M Hibberd; Stephen P Long; Thomas A Moore; James Moroney; Krishna K Niyogi; Martin A J Parry; Pamela P Peralta-Yahya; Roger C Prince; Kevin E Redding; Martin H Spalding; Klaas J van Wijk; Wim F J Vermaas; Susanne von Caemmerer; Andreas P M Weber; Todd O Yeates; Joshua S Yuan; Xin Guang Zhu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The Plastid Casein Kinase 2 Phosphorylates Rubisco Activase at the Thr-78 Site but Is Not Essential for Regulation of Rubisco Activation State.

Authors:  Sang Y Kim; Kyle W Bender; Berkley J Walker; Raymond E Zielinski; Martin H Spalding; Donald R Ort; Steven C Huber
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  12 in total

1.  Removal of redox-sensitive Rubisco Activase does not alter Rubisco regulation in soybean.

Authors:  Christopher M Harvey; Amanda P Cavanagh; Sang Yeol Kim; David A Wright; Ron G Edquilang; Kayla S Shreeves; Juan Alejandro Perdomo; Martin H Spalding; Donald R Ort; Carl J Bernacchi; Steven C Huber
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.429

2.  High-throughput characterization, correlation, and mapping of leaf photosynthetic and functional traits in the soybean (Glycine max) nested association mapping population.

Authors:  Christopher M Montes; Carolyn Fox; Álvaro Sanz-Sáez; Shawn P Serbin; Etsushi Kumagai; Matheus D Krause; Alencar Xavier; James E Specht; William D Beavis; Carl J Bernacchi; Brian W Diers; Elizabeth A Ainsworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Photosynthesis in the fleeting shadows: an overlooked opportunity for increasing crop productivity?

Authors:  Yu Wang; Steven J Burgess; Elsa M de Becker; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 6.417

4.  The impact of slow stomatal kinetics on photosynthesis and water use efficiency under fluctuating light.

Authors:  David Eyland; Jelle van Wesemael; Tracy Lawson; Sebastien Carpentier
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Variation in photosynthetic induction between rice accessions and its potential for improving productivity.

Authors:  Liana G Acevedo-Siaca; Robert Coe; Yu Wang; Johannes Kromdijk; W Paul Quick; Stephen P Long
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Rate of photosynthetic induction in fluctuating light varies widely among genotypes of wheat.

Authors:  William T Salter; Andrew M Merchant; Richard A Richards; Richard Trethowan; Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 6.992

7.  A System Dynamics Approach to Model Photosynthesis at Leaf Level Under Fluctuating Light.

Authors:  Nicole Salvatori; Fabrizio Carteni; Francesco Giannino; Giorgio Alberti; Stefano Mazzoleni; Alessandro Peressotti
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 8.  Photosynthetic Acclimation to Fluctuating Irradiance in Plants.

Authors:  Alejandro Morales; Elias Kaiser
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Higher Stomatal Density Improves Photosynthetic Induction and Biomass Production in Arabidopsis Under Fluctuating Light.

Authors:  Kazuma Sakoda; Wataru Yamori; Tomoo Shimada; Shigeo S Sugano; Ikuko Hara-Nishimura; Yu Tanaka
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Variation between rice accessions in photosynthetic induction in flag leaves and underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Liana G Acevedo-Siaca; Robert Coe; W Paul Quick; Stephen P Long
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.