Literature DB >> 33631811

Stomatal, mesophyll conductance, and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis during induction.

Kazuma Sakoda1,2, Wataru Yamori1, Michael Groszmann3, John R Evans3.   

Abstract

The dynamics of leaf photosynthesis in fluctuating light affects carbon gain by plants. Mesophyll conductance (gm) limits CO2 assimilation rate (A) under the steady state, but the extent of this limitation under non-steady-state conditions is unknown. In the present study, we aimed to characterize the dynamics of gm and the limitations to A imposed by gas diffusional and biochemical processes under fluctuating light. The induction responses of A, stomatal conductance (gs), gm, and the maximum rate of RuBP carboxylation (Vcmax) or electron transport (J) were investigated in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana (L.)) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.). We first characterized gm induction after a change from darkness to light. Each limitation to A imposed by gm, gs and Vcmax or J was significant during induction, indicating that gas diffusional and biochemical processes limit photosynthesis. Initially, gs imposed the greatest limitation to A, showing the slowest response under high light after long and short periods of darkness, assuming RuBP-carboxylation limitation. However, if RuBP-regeneration limitation was assumed, then J imposed the greatest limitation. gm did not vary much following short interruptions to light. The limitation to A imposed by gm was the smallest of all the limitations for most of the induction phase. This suggests that altering induction kinetics of mesophyll conductance would have little impact on A following a change in light. To enhance the carbon gain by plants under naturally dynamic light environments, attention should therefore be focused on faster stomatal opening or activation of electron transport. © American Society of Plant Biologists 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33631811      PMCID: PMC8133641          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiaa011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  61 in total

1.  Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis.

Authors:  Ichiro Terashima; Yuko T Hanba; Danny Tholen; Ülo Niinemets
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Theoretical Considerations when Estimating the Mesophyll Conductance to CO(2) Flux by Analysis of the Response of Photosynthesis to CO(2).

Authors:  P C Harley; F Loreto; G Di Marco; T D Sharkey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Rapid responses of mesophyll conductance to changes of CO2 concentration, temperature and irradiance are affected by N supplements in rice.

Authors:  Dongliang Xiong; Xi Liu; Limin Liu; Cyril Douthe; Yong Li; Shaobing Peng; Jianliang Huang
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 7.228

4.  Differential coordination of stomatal conductance, mesophyll conductance, and leaf hydraulic conductance in response to changing light across species.

Authors:  Dongliang Xiong; Cyril Douthe; Jaume Flexas
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.228

5.  The light response of mesophyll conductance is controlled by structure across leaf profiles.

Authors:  Guillaume Théroux-Rancourt; Matthew E Gilbert
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 7.228

6.  Effects of growth and measurement light intensities on temperature dependence of CO(2) assimilation rate in tobacco leaves.

Authors:  Wataru Yamori; John R Evans; Susanne Von Caemmerer
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 7.228

7.  Overexpression of the barley aquaporin HvPIP2;1 increases internal CO(2) conductance and CO(2) assimilation in the leaves of transgenic rice plants.

Authors:  Yuko T Hanba; Mineo Shibasaka; Yasuyuki Hayashi; Takahiko Hayakawa; Kunihiro Kasamo; Ichiro Terashima; Maki Katsuhara
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.927

8.  Variation in photosynthetic induction between rice accessions and its potential for improving productivity.

Authors:  Liana G Acevedo-Siaca; Robert Coe; Yu Wang; Johannes Kromdijk; W Paul Quick; Stephen P Long
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 10.151

9.  Overexpression of rice aquaporin OsPIP1;2 improves yield by enhancing mesophyll CO2 conductance and phloem sucrose transport.

Authors:  Feiyun Xu; Ke Wang; Wei Yuan; Weifeng Xu; Liu Shuang; Herbert J Kronzucker; Guanglei Chen; Rui Miao; Maoxing Zhang; Ming Ding; Liang Xiao; Lei Kai; Jianhua Zhang; Yiyong Zhu
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Whole Irradiated Plant Leaves Showed Faster Photosynthetic Induction Than Individually Irradiated Leaves via Improved Stomatal Opening.

Authors:  Shunji Shimadzu; Mitsunori Seo; Ichiro Terashima; Wataru Yamori
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Cost-benefit analysis of mesophyll conductance: diversities of anatomical, biochemical and environmental determinants.

Authors:  Yusuke Mizokami; Riichi Oguchi; Daisuke Sugiura; Wataru Yamori; Ko Noguchi; Ichiro Terashima
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 5.040

2.  The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus clarus improves physiological tolerance to drought stress in soybean plants.

Authors:  Thales Caetano Oliveira; Juliana Silva Rodrigues Cabral; Leticia Rezende Santana; Germanna Gouveia Tavares; Luan Dionísio Silva Santos; Tiago Prado Paim; Caroline Müller; Fabiano Guimarães Silva; Alan Carlos Costa; Edson Luiz Souchie; Giselle Camargo Mendes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Variation of Photosynthetic Induction in Major Horticultural Crops Is Mostly Driven by Differences in Stomatal Traits.

Authors:  Ningyi Zhang; Sarah R Berman; Dominique Joubert; Silvere Vialet-Chabrand; Leo F M Marcelis; Elias Kaiser
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Photosynthetic Induction Under Fluctuating Light Is Affected by Leaf Nitrogen Content in Tomato.

Authors:  Hu Sun; Yu-Qi Zhang; Shi-Bao Zhang; Wei Huang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Acclimating Cucumber Plants to Blue Supplemental Light Promotes Growth in Full Sunlight.

Authors:  Chenqian Kang; Yuqi Zhang; Ruifeng Cheng; Elias Kaiser; Qichang Yang; Tao Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 5.753

6.  Effect of Stomatal Morphology on Leaf Photosynthetic Induction Under Fluctuating Light in Rice.

Authors:  Zhuang Xiong; Zhigang Dun; Yucheng Wang; Desheng Yang; Dongliang Xiong; Kehui Cui; Shaobing Peng; Jianliang Huang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Diurnal Response of Photosystem I to Fluctuating Light Is Affected by Stomatal Conductance.

Authors:  Ting-Yu Li; Qi Shi; Hu Sun; Ming Yue; Shi-Bao Zhang; Wei Huang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Exogenous melatonin strongly affects dynamic photosynthesis and enhances water-water cycle in tobacco.

Authors:  Hu Sun; Xiao-Qian Wang; Zhi-Lan Zeng; Ying-Jie Yang; Wei Huang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Diurnal Change of the Photosynthetic Light-Response Curve of Buckbean (Menyanthes trifoliata), an Emergent Aquatic Plant.

Authors:  Azumi Okamoto; Kohei Koyama; Narayan Bhusal
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.