Literature DB >> 28025286

Photosynthetic induction and its diffusional, carboxylation and electron transport processes as affected by CO2 partial pressure, temperature, air humidity and blue irradiance.

Elias Kaiser1, Johannes Kromdijk2, Jeremy Harbinson3, Ep Heuvelink3, Leo F M Marcelis3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Plants depend on photosynthesis for growth. In nature, factors such as temperature, humidity, CO2 partial pressure, and spectrum and intensity of irradiance often fluctuate. Whereas irradiance intensity is most influential and has been studied in detail, understanding of interactions with other factors is lacking.
METHODS: We tested how photosynthetic induction after dark-light transitions was affected by CO2 partial pressure (20, 40, 80 Pa), leaf temperatures (15·5, 22·8, 30·5 °C), leaf-to-air vapour pressure deficits (VPDleaf-air; 0·5, 0·8, 1·6, 2·3 kPa) and blue irradiance (0-20 %) in tomato leaves (Solanum lycopersicum). KEY
RESULTS: Rates of photosynthetic induction strongly increased with CO2 partial pressure, due to increased apparent Rubisco activation rates and reduced diffusional limitations. High leaf temperature produced slightly higher induction rates, and increased intrinsic water use efficiency and diffusional limitation. High VPDleaf-air slowed down induction rates and apparent Rubisco activation and (at 2·3 kPa) induced damped stomatal oscillations. Blue irradiance had no effect. Slower apparent Rubisco activation in elevated VPDleaf-air may be explained by low leaf internal CO2 partial pressure at the beginning of induction.
CONCLUSIONS: The environmental factors CO2 partial pressure, temperature and VPDleaf-air had significant impacts on rates of photosynthetic induction, as well as on underlying diffusional, carboxylation and electron transport processes. Furthermore, maximizing Rubisco activation rates would increase photosynthesis by at most 6-8 % in ambient CO2 partial pressure (across temperatures and humidities), while maximizing rates of stomatal opening would increase photosynthesis by at most 1-3 %.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 concentration; Dynamic photosynthesis; Rubisco; Solanum lycopersicum; diffusional limitation; humidity; stomatal conductance; temperature; tomato

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28025286      PMCID: PMC5218377          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  39 in total

1.  Light modulation of Rubisco in Arabidopsis requires a capacity for redox regulation of the larger Rubisco activase isoform.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Russell P Kallis; Robert G Ewy; Archie R Portis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The control of stomata by water balance.

Authors:  Thomas N Buckley
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.151

3.  Theoretical Considerations when Estimating the Mesophyll Conductance to CO(2) Flux by Analysis of the Response of Photosynthesis to CO(2).

Authors:  P C Harley; F Loreto; G Di Marco; T D Sharkey
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 4.  Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects.

Authors:  Jaume Flexas; Miquel Ribas-Carbó; Antonio Diaz-Espejo; Jeroni Galmés; Hipólito Medrano
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 5.  Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield.

Authors:  Xin-Guang Zhu; Stephen P Long; Donald R Ort
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 26.379

6.  The magnitude of the stomatal response to blue light : modulation by atmospheric humidity.

Authors:  S M Assmann; D A Grantz
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  The regulatory properties of Rubisco activase differ among species and affect photosynthetic induction during light transitions.

Authors:  A Elizabete Carmo-Silva; Michael E Salvucci
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Temperature responses of mesophyll conductance differ greatly between species.

Authors:  Susanne von Caemmerer; John R Evans
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 7.228

Review 9.  Optimizing Rubisco and its regulation for greater resource use efficiency.

Authors:  Elizabete Carmo-Silva; Joanna C Scales; Pippa J Madgwick; Martin A J Parry
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 7.228

10.  Metabolic and diffusional limitations of photosynthesis in fluctuating irradiance in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Alejandro Morales; Jeremy Harbinson; Ep Heuvelink; Aina E Prinzenberg; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Fluctuating Light Takes Crop Photosynthesis on a Rollercoaster Ride.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Alejandro Morales; Jeremy Harbinson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Photosynthesis: basics, history and modelling.

Authors:  Alexandrina Stirbet; Dušan Lazár; Ya Guo; Govindjee Govindjee
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Rethinking the Influence of Chloroplast Movements on Non-photochemical Quenching and Photoprotection.

Authors:  Sam Wilson; Alexander V Ruban
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  In Silico Analysis of the Regulation of the Photosynthetic Electron Transport Chain in C3 Plants.

Authors:  Alejandro Morales; Xinyou Yin; Jeremy Harbinson; Steven M Driever; Jaap Molenaar; David M Kramer; Paul C Struik
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Stomatal, mesophyll conductance, and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis during induction.

Authors:  Kazuma Sakoda; Wataru Yamori; Michael Groszmann; John R Evans
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Slow induction of photosynthesis on shade to sun transitions in wheat may cost at least 21% of productivity.

Authors:  Samuel H Taylor; Stephen P Long
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Elevated CO2 increases photosynthesis in fluctuating irradiance regardless of photosynthetic induction state.

Authors:  Elias Kaiser; Dianfan Zhou; Ep Heuvelink; Jeremy Harbinson; Alejandro Morales; Leo F M Marcelis
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  Dynamic light caused less photosynthetic suppression, rather than more, under nitrogen deficit conditions than under sufficient nitrogen supply conditions in soybean.

Authors:  Yu-Ting Li; Ying Li; Yue-Nan Li; Ying Liang; Qiang Sun; Geng Li; Peng Liu; Zi-Shan Zhang; Hui-Yuan Gao
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Variation in photosynthetic induction between rice accessions and its potential for improving productivity.

Authors:  Liana G Acevedo-Siaca; Robert Coe; Yu Wang; Johannes Kromdijk; W Paul Quick; Stephen P Long
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Whole plant chamber to examine sensitivity of cereal gas exchange to changes in evaporative demand.

Authors:  Iván Jauregui; Shane A Rothwell; Samuel H Taylor; Martin A J Parry; Elizabete Carmo-Silva; Ian C Dodd
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.993

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.