Literature DB >> 26530839

Robotically assisted laparoscopy benefits surgical performance under stress.

Lee J Moore1, Mark R Wilson2, Elizabeth Waine3, John S McGrath3, Rich S W Masters4,5, Samuel J Vine6.   

Abstract

While the benefits of robotic surgery for the patient have been relatively well established, little is known about the benefits for the surgeon. This study examined whether the advantages of robotically assisted laparoscopy (improved dexterity, a 3-dimensional view, reduction in tremors, etc.) enable the surgeon to better deal with stressful tasks. Subjective and objective (i.e. cardiovascular) responses to stress were assessed while surgeons performed on either a robotic or conventional laparoscopic system. Thirty-two surgeons were assigned to perform a surgical task on either a robotic system or a laparoscopic system, under three stress conditions. The surgeons completed self-report measures of stress before each condition. Furthermore, the surgeons' cardiovascular responses to stress were recorded prior to each condition. Finally, task performance was recorded throughout each condition. While both groups reported experiencing similar levels of stress, compared to the laparoscopic group, the robotic group displayed a more adaptive cardiovascular response to the stress conditions, reflecting a challenge state (i.e. higher blood flow and lower vascular resistance). Furthermore, despite no differences in completion time, the robotic group performed the tasks more accurately than the laparoscopic group across the stress conditions. These results highlight the benefits of using robotic technology during stressful situations. Specifically, the results show that stressful tasks can be performed more accurately with a robotic platform, and that surgeons' cardiovascular responses to stress are more favourable. Importantly, the 'challenge' cardiovascular response to stress displayed when using the robotic system has been associated with more positive long-term health outcomes in domains where stress is commonly experienced (e.g. lower cardiovascular disease risk).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular; Challenge and threat; Pressure; Psychology; Stress

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26530839     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-015-0527-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  28 in total

1.  A new impedance cardiograph device for the non-invasive evaluation of cardiac output at rest and during exercise: comparison with the "direct" Fick method.

Authors:  A Charloux; E Lonsdorfer-Wolf; R Richard; E Lampert; M Oswald-Mammosser; B Mettauer; B Geny; J Lonsdorfer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Stress appraisals and cellular aging: a key role for anticipatory threat in the relationship between psychological stress and telomere length.

Authors:  Aoife O'Donovan; A Janet Tomiyama; Jue Lin; Eli Puterman; Nancy E Adler; Margaret Kemeny; Owen M Wolkowitz; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Elissa S Epel
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 7.217

3.  Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces.

Authors:  Martina I Klein; Joel S Warm; Michael A Riley; Gerald Matthews; Charles Doarn; James F Donovan; Krishnanath Gaitonde
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Evaluating stress as a challenge is associated with superior attentional control and motor skill performance: testing the predictions of the biopsychosocial model of challenge and threat.

Authors:  Samuel J Vine; Paul Freeman; Lee J Moore; Roy Chandra-Ramanan; Mark R Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2013-09

Review 5.  The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Mental stress experienced by first-year residents and expert surgeons with robotic and laparoscopic surgery interfaces.

Authors:  Martina I Klein; Vladimir Mouraviev; Curtis Craig; Lou Salamone; Timothy A Plerhoples; Sherry M Wren; Krishnanath Gaitonde
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-01-23

7.  Examining the antecedents of challenge and threat states: the influence of perceived required effort and support availability.

Authors:  Lee J Moore; Samuel J Vine; Mark R Wilson; Paul Freeman
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Cardiovascular reactivity and adaptation to recurrent psychological stress: the moderating effects of evaluative observation.

Authors:  R M Kelsey; J Blascovich; C L Leitten; T R Schneider; J Tomaka; S Wiens
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Who thrives under pressure? Predicting the performance of elite academy cricketers using the cardiovascular indicators of challenge and threat states.

Authors:  Martin J Turner; Marc V Jones; David Sheffield; Matthew J Slater; Jamie B Barker; James J Bell
Journal:  J Sport Exerc Psychol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.016

10.  Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R H van der Schatte Olivier; C D P Van't Hullenaar; J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  6 in total

1.  Robotic pelvic dissection as surgical treatment of complicated diverticulitis in elective settings: a comparative study with fully laparoscopic procedure.

Authors:  Diletta Cassini; Norma Depalma; Michele Grieco; Roberto Cirocchi; Farshad Manoochehri; Gianandrea Baldazzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Effects of Flow Disruptions on Mental Workload and Surgical Performance in Robotic-Assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Jeannette Weber; Ken Catchpole; Armin J Becker; Boris Schlenker; Matthias Weigl
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Overcoming the impact of physiologic tremors in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Gurfarmaan Singh; Wilson Wong Jun Jie; Michelle Tian Sun; Robert Casson; Dinesh Selva; WengOnn Chan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Does robotic rectal cancer surgery improve the results of experienced laparoscopic surgeons? An observational single institution study comparing 168 robotic assisted with 184 laparoscopic rectal resections.

Authors:  Rogier M P H Crolla; Paul G Mulder; George P van der Schelling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion versus open radical cystectomy (iROC): protocol for a randomised controlled trial with internal feasibility study.

Authors:  James W F Catto; Pramit Khetrapal; Gareth Ambler; Rachael Sarpong; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Melanie Tan; Andrew Feber; Simon Dixon; Louise Goodwin; Norman R Williams; John McGrath; Edward Rowe; Anthony Koupparis; Chris Brew-Graves; John D Kelly
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  Review of the evidence for robotic-assisted robotic cystectomy and intra-corporeal urinary diversion in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Andrew Brodie; Kittinut Kijvikai; Karel Decaestecker; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.