Literature DB >> 22429084

Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces.

Martina I Klein1, Joel S Warm, Michael A Riley, Gerald Matthews, Charles Doarn, James F Donovan, Krishnanath Gaitonde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: High levels of mental workload and stress are experienced by surgeons in the laparoscopic environment. The da Vinci(®) surgical robot was developed to provide surgeons a more user-friendly interface while maintaining the patient benefits associated with laparoscopy. This study examined whether the da Vinci robot reduces mental workload and stress in novice medical students. A detailed understanding of trainees' mental workload and mental stress experiences can aid in the development of training programs that are aimed at facilitating the acquisition of laparoscopic and robotic surgery skills.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen novice first-year medical students performed a standard peg-transfer task at a laparoscopic simulator and the da Vinci Surgical System. Mental workload and stress were assessed with the Multiple Resources Questionnaire (MRQ) and the Dundee Stress State Questionnaire (DSSQ), respectively.
RESULTS: Students' mental workload profiles were identical with the two surgical systems and replicated previous MRQ results reported with the laparoscopic system showing high levels of workload. Students experienced a better stress profile with the robotic system, however, when compared wih the laparoscopic system.
CONCLUSION: Our study shows that novice medical students perceive less stress when working with the robotic surgical interface than with the laparoscopic surgery interface. The MRQ and the DSSQ are valuable tools for identifying mental workload and mental stress in the laparoscopic and robotic surgery environments. This information may be useful for facilitating the acquisition of laparoscopic and robotic surgery skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22429084     DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  16 in total

1.  Skill acquisition and stress adaptations following laparoscopic surgery training and detraining in novice surgeons.

Authors:  Blair T Crewther; Kunal Shetty; Delaram Jarchi; Shaun Selvadurai; Christian J Cook; Daniel R Leff; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Robotically assisted laparoscopy benefits surgical performance under stress.

Authors:  Lee J Moore; Mark R Wilson; Elizabeth Waine; John S McGrath; Rich S W Masters; Samuel J Vine
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-08-02

3.  The end of robot-assisted laparoscopy? A critical appraisal of scientific evidence on the use of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeroen Heemskerk; Nicole D Bouvy; Cor G M I Baeten
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee; Tameka Clanton; Tamera Clanton; Erica Sutton; Adrian E Park; Michael R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Surgeons' display reduced mental effort and workload while performing robotically assisted surgical tasks, when compared to conventional laparoscopy.

Authors:  Lee J Moore; Mark R Wilson; John S McGrath; Elizabeth Waine; Rich S W Masters; Samuel J Vine
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Experience implication in subjective surgical ergonomics comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries.

Authors:  V Mendes; Franck Bruyere; Jean Michel Escoffre; Aurelien Binet; Hubert Lardy; Henri Marret; Frederic Marchal; Thomas Hebert
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-12

7.  Surgeons' physical discomfort and symptoms during robotic surgery: a comprehensive ergonomic survey study.

Authors:  G I Lee; M R Lee; I Green; M Allaf; M R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Mental stress experienced by first-year residents and expert surgeons with robotic and laparoscopic surgery interfaces.

Authors:  Martina I Klein; Vladimir Mouraviev; Curtis Craig; Lou Salamone; Timothy A Plerhoples; Sherry M Wren; Krishnanath Gaitonde
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-01-23

9.  Systematic review of measurement tools to assess surgeons' intraoperative cognitive workload.

Authors:  R D Dias; M C Ngo-Howard; M T Boskovski; M A Zenati; S J Yule
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Prospective cohort study on surgeons' response to equipment failure in the laparoscopic environment.

Authors:  Maurits Graafland; Willem A Bemelman; Marlies P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.