Tai H Dou1, David H Thomas2, Dylan P O'Connell2, James M Lamb2, Percy Lee2, Daniel A Low2. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: tdou@mednet.ucla.edu. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop a technique that assesses the accuracy of the breathing phase-specific volume image generation process by patient-specific breathing motion model using the original free-breathing computed tomographic (CT) scans as ground truths. METHODS: Sixteen lung cancer patients underwent a previously published protocol in which 25 free-breathing fast helical CT scans were acquired with a simultaneous breathing surrogate. A patient-specific motion model was constructed based on the tissue displacements determined by a state-of-the-art deformable image registration. The first image was arbitrarily selected as the reference image. The motion model was used, along with the free-breathing phase information of the original 25 image datasets, to generate a set of deformation vector fields that mapped the reference image to the 24 nonreference images. The high-pitch helically acquired original scans served as ground truths because they captured the instantaneous tissue positions during free breathing. Image similarity between the simulated and the original scans was assessed using deformable registration that evaluated the pointwise discordance throughout the lungs. RESULTS: Qualitative comparisons using image overlays showed excellent agreement between the simulated images and the original images. Even large 2-cm diaphragm displacements were very well modeled, as was sliding motion across the lung-chest wall boundary. The mean error across the patient cohort was 1.15 ± 0.37 mm, and the mean 95th percentile error was 2.47 ± 0.78 mm. CONCLUSION: The proposed ground truth-based technique provided voxel-by-voxel accuracy analysis that could identify organ-specific or tumor-specific motion modeling errors for treatment planning. Despite a large variety of breathing patterns and lung deformations during the free-breathing scanning session, the 5-dimensionl CT technique was able to accurately reproduce the original helical CT scans, suggesting its applicability to a wide range of patients.
PURPOSE: To develop a technique that assesses the accuracy of the breathing phase-specific volume image generation process by patient-specific breathing motion model using the original free-breathing computed tomographic (CT) scans as ground truths. METHODS: Sixteen lung cancerpatients underwent a previously published protocol in which 25 free-breathing fast helical CT scans were acquired with a simultaneous breathing surrogate. A patient-specific motion model was constructed based on the tissue displacements determined by a state-of-the-art deformable image registration. The first image was arbitrarily selected as the reference image. The motion model was used, along with the free-breathing phase information of the original 25 image datasets, to generate a set of deformation vector fields that mapped the reference image to the 24 nonreference images. The high-pitch helically acquired original scans served as ground truths because they captured the instantaneous tissue positions during free breathing. Image similarity between the simulated and the original scans was assessed using deformable registration that evaluated the pointwise discordance throughout the lungs. RESULTS: Qualitative comparisons using image overlays showed excellent agreement between the simulated images and the original images. Even large 2-cm diaphragm displacements were very well modeled, as was sliding motion across the lung-chest wall boundary. The mean error across the patient cohort was 1.15 ± 0.37 mm, and the mean 95th percentile error was 2.47 ± 0.78 mm. CONCLUSION: The proposed ground truth-based technique provided voxel-by-voxel accuracy analysis that could identify organ-specific or tumor-specific motion modeling errors for treatment planning. Despite a large variety of breathing patterns and lung deformations during the free-breathing scanning session, the 5-dimensionl CT technique was able to accurately reproduce the original helical CT scans, suggesting its applicability to a wide range of patients.
Authors: Coen W Hurkmans; Maarten van Lieshout; Danny Schuring; Mariëlle J T van Heumen; Johan P Cuijpers; Frank J Lagerwaard; Joachim Widder; Uulke A van der Heide; Suresh Senan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Keelin Murphy; Bram van Ginneken; Joseph M Reinhardt; Sven Kabus; Kai Ding; Xiang Deng; Kunlin Cao; Kaifang Du; Gary E Christensen; Vincent Garcia; Tom Vercauteren; Nicholas Ayache; Olivier Commowick; Grégoire Malandain; Ben Glocker; Nikos Paragios; Nassir Navab; Vladlena Gorbunova; Jon Sporring; Marleen de Bruijne; Xiao Han; Mattias P Heinrich; Julia A Schnabel; Mark Jenkinson; Cristian Lorenz; Marc Modat; Jamie R McClelland; Sébastien Ourselin; Sascha E A Muenzing; Max A Viergever; Dante De Nigris; D Louis Collins; Tal Arbel; Marta Peroni; Rui Li; Gregory C Sharp; Alexander Schmidt-Richberg; Jan Ehrhardt; René Werner; Dirk Smeets; Dirk Loeckx; Gang Song; Nicholas Tustison; Brian Avants; James C Gee; Marius Staring; Stefan Klein; Berend C Stoel; Martin Urschler; Manuel Werlberger; Jef Vandemeulebroucke; Simon Rit; David Sarrut; Josien P W Pluim Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Daniel A Low; Michelle Nystrom; Eugene Kalinin; Parag Parikh; James F Dempsey; Jeffrey D Bradley; Sasa Mutic; Sasha H Wahab; Tareque Islam; Gary Christensen; David G Politte; Bruce R Whiting Journal: Med Phys Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Daniel A Low; Dylan O'Connell; Michael Lauria; Bradley Stiehl; Louise Naumann; Percy Lee; John Hegde; Igor Barjaktarevic; Jonathan Goldin; Anand Santhanam Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-09-04 Impact factor: 4.506