Literature DB >> 26527096

Face-induced expectancies influence neural mechanisms of performance monitoring.

Roman Osinsky1, Jennifer Seeger2, Patrick Mussel2, Johannes Hewig2.   

Abstract

In many daily situations, the consequences of our actions are predicted by cues that are often social in nature. For instance, seeing the face of an evaluator (e.g., a supervisor at work) may activate certain evaluative expectancies, depending on the history of prior encounters with that particular person. We investigated how such face-induced expectancies influence neurocognitive functions of performance monitoring. We recorded an electroencephalogram while participants completed a time-estimation task, during which they received performance feedback from a strict and a lenient evaluator. During each trial, participants first saw the evaluator's face before performing the task and, finally, receiving feedback. Therefore, faces could be used as predictive cues for the upcoming evaluation. We analyzed electrocortical signatures of performance monitoring at the stages of cue processing, task performance, and feedback reception. Our results indicate that, at the cue stage, seeing the strict evaluator's face results in an anticipatory preparation of fronto-medial monitoring mechanisms, as reflected by a sustained negative-going amplitude shift (i.e., the contingent negative variation). At the performance stage, face-induced expectancies of a strict evaluation rule led to increases of early performance monitoring signals (i.e., frontal-midline theta power). At the final stage of feedback reception, violations of outcome expectancies differentially affected the feedback-related negativity and frontal-midline theta power, pointing to a functional dissociation between these signatures. Altogether, our results indicate that evaluative expectancies induced by face-cues lead to adjustments of internal performance monitoring mechanisms at various stages of task processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contingent negative variation; Error-related negativity; Feedback-related negativity; Frontal-midline theta; Posterior medial frontal cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26527096     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-015-0387-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  63 in total

1.  EEG oscillatory patterns are associated with error prediction during music performance and are altered in musician's dystonia.

Authors:  María Herrojo Ruiz; Felix Strübing; Hans-Christian Jabusch; Eckart Altenmüller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Error-likelihood prediction in the medial frontal cortex: a critical evaluation.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Tanja Sophie Schweizer; Rogier B Mars; Matthew M Botvinick; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior.

Authors:  Markus Ullsperger; Claudia Danielmeier; Gerhard Jocham
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  The processing of unexpected positive response outcomes in the mediofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Nicola K Ferdinand; Axel Mecklinger; Jutta Kray; William J Gehring
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Feedback-related potentials are sensitive to sequential order of decision outcomes in a gambling task.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Patrick Mussel; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  State- and trait-greed, its impact on risky decision-making and underlying neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Patrick Mussel; Andrea M F Reiter; Roman Osinsky; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Feedback-related negativity codes prediction error but not behavioral adjustment during probabilistic reversal learning.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Rachel Swainson; Lucy Durham; Laura Benham; Roshan Cools
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Dopamine effects on human error processing depend on catechol-O-methyltransferase VAL158MET genotype.

Authors:  Erik M Mueller; Scott Makeig; Gerhard Stemmler; Jürgen Hennig; Jan Wacker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Frontal midline theta and N200 amplitude reflect complementary information about expectancy and outcome evaluation.

Authors:  Azadeh Hajihosseini; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Proactive and reactive processes in the medial frontal cortex: an electrophysiological study.

Authors:  Flavio T P Oliveira; Clayton Hickey; John J McDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Converging electrophysiological evidence for a processing advantage of social over nonsocial feedback.

Authors:  Daniela M Pfabigan; Shihui Han
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Modulatory effects of positive mood and approach motivation on reward processing: Two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  Katharina Paul; Gilles Pourtois; Eddie Harmon-Jones
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Deficits in Response Inhibition in Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: The Impaired Self-Protection System Hypothesis.

Authors:  Thales Vianna Coutinho; Samara Passos Santos Reis; Antonio Geraldo da Silva; Debora Marques Miranda; Leandro Fernandes Malloy-Diniz
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Mood congruent tuning of reward expectation in positive mood: evidence from FRN and theta modulations.

Authors:  Katharina Paul; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Cue-Related Processing in a Gambling Task: Early Outcome Evaluation or Outcome Expectation?

Authors:  Xiaoyi Zhang; Xiaohong Lin; Shiho Takagi; Liyang Sai
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.