Literature DB >> 23066877

Feedback-related potentials are sensitive to sequential order of decision outcomes in a gambling task.

Roman Osinsky1, Patrick Mussel, Johannes Hewig.   

Abstract

The feedback negativity (FN) has been repeatedly linked to expectancies about decision outcomes. Sequential outcome order is likely to influence such expectancies but has been widely disregarded. We therefore investigated whether the three-trial order of decision outcomes in a gambling task influences the FN as well as the P200 and P300. All three deflections were not only influenced by the outcome valence of the current trial but also by the outcomes of the two preceding trials. In detail, the FN and P300 to any current trial outcome were largest when the outcomes in the two preceding trials had an opposite valence. The P200 was highest in the context of two directly preceding wins, indicating that it may reflect representations of local outcome history. Our findings demonstrate that neural systems involved in decision outcome processing dynamically and continuously integrate the local outcome history for the evaluation of present outcomes.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23066877     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01473.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  9 in total

1.  A neural signature of the creation of social evaluation.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Patrick Mussel; Linda Ohrlein; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Face-induced expectancies influence neural mechanisms of performance monitoring.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Jennifer Seeger; Patrick Mussel; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Reward contingencies and the recalibration of task monitoring and reward systems: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  K P Morie; P De Sanctis; J J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Sequential gains and losses during gambling feedback: Differential effects in time-frequency delta and theta measures.

Authors:  Matthew D Bachman; Adreanna T M Watts; Paul Collins; Edward M Bernat
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 4.348

5.  Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations.

Authors:  Yiwen Wang; Zhen Zhang; Liying Bai; Chongde Lin; Roman Osinsky; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Anxious Individuals Are Impulsive Decision-Makers in the Delay Discounting Task: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Lisheng Xia; Ruolei Gu; Dandan Zhang; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Neural correlates of successful costly punishment in the Ultimatum game on a trial-by-trial basis.

Authors:  Patrick Mussel; Martin Weiß; Johannes Rodrigues; Hauke Heekeren; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.235

8.  The Feedback-Related Negativity and the P300 Brain Potential Are Sensitive to Price Expectation Violations in a Virtual Shopping Task.

Authors:  Alexandre Schaefer; Luciano G Buratto; Nobuhiko Goto; Emilie V Brotherhood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Randomised prior feedback modulates neural signals of outcome monitoring.

Authors:  Faisal Mushtaq; Richard M Wilkie; Mark A Mon-Williams; Alexandre Schaefer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 6.556

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.