Literature DB >> 32043206

Modulatory effects of positive mood and approach motivation on reward processing: Two sides of the same coin?

Katharina Paul1, Gilles Pourtois2, Eddie Harmon-Jones3.   

Abstract

In a previous study (Paul & Pourtois, 2017), we found that positive mood substantially influenced the neural processing of reward, mostly by altering expectations and creating an optimistic bias. Under positive mood, the Reward Positivity (RewP) component and fronto-medial theta activity (FMθ) in response to monetary feedback were both changed compared with neutral mood. Nevertheless, whether positive valence per se or motivational intensity drove these neurophysiological effects remained unclear. To address this question, we combined a mindset manipulation with an imagery procedure to create and maintain three different affective states using a between-subjects design: a neutral mood, and positive mood with either high or low motivational intensity. After mood induction, 161 participants performed a simple gambling task while 64-channel EEG was recorded. FMθ activity results showed that irrespective of motivational intensity, positive compared with neutral mood altered reward expectancy. By comparison, RewP was not affected by positive mood nor motivational intensity. These results suggest that positive mood, rather than motivational intensity, is likely driving the change in reward expectation during gambling, which could reflect the presence of an optimistic bias. Moreover, at the methodological level, they confirm that the RewP ERP component and FMθ activity can capture dissociable effects during reward processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erp; Mood; Motivation; Reward

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32043206     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-019-00764-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  60 in total

1.  Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses.

Authors:  S Makeig; M Westerfield; T P Jung; S Enghoff; J Townsend; E Courchesne; T J Sejnowski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra.

Authors:  Michael X Cohen; Christian E Elger; Charan Ranganath
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The role of asymmetric frontal cortical activity in emotion-related phenomena: a review and update.

Authors:  Eddie Harmon-Jones; Philip A Gable; Carly K Peterson
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Self-report and behavioral measures of reward sensitivity predict the feedback negativity.

Authors:  Jennifer N Bress; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Frontal theta overrides pavlovian learning biases.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Ian Eisenberg; Marc Guitart-Masip; Quentin Huys; Michael J Frank
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Integration of reward with cost anticipation during performance monitoring revealed by ERPs and EEG spectral perturbations.

Authors:  Davide Gheza; Rudi De Raedt; Chris Baeken; Gilles Pourtois
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Face-induced expectancies influence neural mechanisms of performance monitoring.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Jennifer Seeger; Patrick Mussel; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Frontal theta oscillatory activity is a common mechanism for the computation of unexpected outcomes and learning rate.

Authors:  Ernest Mas-Herrero; Josep Marco-Pallarés
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The feedback-related negativity (FRN) revisited: new insights into the localization, meaning and network organization.

Authors:  Tobias U Hauser; Reto Iannaccone; Philipp Stämpfli; Renate Drechsler; Daniel Brandeis; Susanne Walitza; Silvia Brem
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 37.312

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The basal ganglia and the cerebellum in human emotion.

Authors:  Jordan E Pierce; Julie Péron
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.