Literature DB >> 20146610

Feedback-related negativity codes prediction error but not behavioral adjustment during probabilistic reversal learning.

Henry W Chase1, Rachel Swainson, Lucy Durham, Laura Benham, Roshan Cools.   

Abstract

We assessed electrophysiological activity over the medial frontal cortex (MFC) during outcome-based behavioral adjustment using a probabilistic reversal learning task. During recording, participants were presented two abstract visual patterns on each trial and had to select the stimulus rewarded on 80% of trials and to avoid the stimulus rewarded on 20% of trials. These contingencies were reversed frequently during the experiment. Previous EEG work has revealed feedback-locked electrophysiological responses over the MFC (feedback-related negativity; FRN), which correlate with the negative prediction error [Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679-709, 2002] and which predict outcome-based adjustment of decision values [Cohen, M. X., & Ranganath, C. Reinforcement learning signals predict future decisions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 371-378, 2007]. Unlike previous paradigms, our paradigm enabled us to disentangle, on the one hand, mechanisms related to the reward prediction error, derived from reinforcement learning (RL) modeling, and on the other hand, mechanisms related to explicit rule-based adjustment of actual behavior. Our results demonstrate greater FRN amplitudes with greater RL model-derived prediction errors. Conversely expected negative outcomes that preceded rule-based behavioral reversal were not accompanied by an FRN. This pattern contrasted remarkably with that of the P3 amplitude, which was significantly greater for expected negative outcomes that preceded rule-based behavioral reversal than for unexpected negative outcomes that did not precede behavioral reversal. These data suggest that the FRN reflects prediction error and associated RL-based adjustment of decision values, whereas the P3 reflects adjustment of behavior on the basis of explicit rules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20146610     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  63 in total

1.  Brain oscillatory activity associated with task switching and feedback processing.

Authors:  Toni Cunillera; Lluís Fuentemilla; Jose Periañez; Josep Marco-Pallarès; Ulrike M Krämer; Estela Càmara; Thomas F Münte; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Frontal theta reflects uncertainty and unexpectedness during exploration and exploitation.

Authors:  James F Cavanagh; Christina M Figueroa; Michael X Cohen; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Genetic influences on functional connectivity associated with feedback processing and prediction error: Phase coupling of theta-band oscillations in twins.

Authors:  Şükrü Barış Demiral; Simon Golosheykin; Andrey P Anokhin
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Executive control- and reward-related neural processes associated with the opportunity to engage in voluntary dishonest moral decision making.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Hu; Narun Pornpattananangkul; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Trait "pessimism" is associated with increased sensitivity to negative feedback in rats.

Authors:  Rafal Rygula; Piotr Popik
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Emotion blocks the path to learning under stereotype threat.

Authors:  Jennifer A Mangels; Catherine Good; Ronald C Whiteman; Brian Maniscalco; Carol S Dweck
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Event-related potentials reflect impaired temporal interval learning following haloperidol administration.

Authors:  Sarah E Forster; Patrick Zirnheld; Anantha Shekhar; Stuart R Steinhauer; Brian F O'Donnell; William P Hetrick
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Electrophysiological measures reveal the role of anterior cingulate cortex in learning from unreliable feedback.

Authors:  Peng Li; Weiwei Peng; Hong Li; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  The role of outcome expectations in the generation of the feedback-related negativity.

Authors:  Andrew W Bismark; Greg Hajcak; Nicole M Whitworth; John J B Allen
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.